... DreamBook ...DreamHost Apps : Free WordPress hosting at your own domain and more!

Handprints Spanking Art & Stories Page
Welcome to Dreambook, a nifty new free service from:
New Dream Network, Dreamhost, and Dreamservers!

If you have a minute, please sign my Dreambook too!


Name: Deacon Blues
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I like to draw because it heals me more than anything. Its not even the things I draw, its the time I spend just thinking about stuff.
Thursday, May 7th 2009 - 10:12:15 PM
Name: HandPrince
E-mail address: handprince@excite.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I will be going on vacation for a month, so don't expect any updates until mid June at the earliest.
Tuesday, May 12th 2009 - 10:08:39 PM
Name: Cold Stone
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:The Washington Post, Feb 6, 1935

Author Urges Hair Brush for Children, Wielded While Angry

New York, Feb. 5 (AP) Sound spankings, preferably administered in a burst of anger still constitute the best form of child-training in the studied opinion of Mrs. John S. Reilly, socially prominent author and lecturer.

Herself the mother of seven, Mrs Reilly asserted she had examined the data of modern psychologists and child experts - and found them wanting. In addition to insisting on spankings, she added, the old-fashioned hair brush should remian a vital part of parents's equipment in rearing their children.

Without it being applied liberally, Mrs. Reilly said, children grow into "brats."

Modern Upbringing "Unfair"


"There is no age limit," she asserted. "Spanking is a good idea because it keeps children in touch with reality. Modern upbringing, in which children are allowed to do whatever they want, is very unfair to them."

Disagreeing with many child specialists, Mrs. Reilly advocates spankings administered "with a good, honest rage about them."

"I agree with Shaw," she observed, "that you should never spank except when in anger. Of couse, I don't believe in brutal beatings, but spanking in the place the Lord meant for it, with a touch of zest, harms no child and does lots of good to most youngsters. Normal mothers can be trusted to spank without injuring their children.

She Practices System


"If you spank early enough, you establish your discipline and it continues of itself. there will be some outbreaks to be corrected later, but not as often."

By "early" Mrs. Reilly said she meant any time after a year and a half.

"It's the only language every child understands," she added.

The wife of a former Yale University baseball player, Mrs. Reilly is the mother of three boys and four girls ranging in age from 5 to 15 years. She rears them all upon the hairbrush.

"They're a happy, hearty, gay lot of children, too, and not a bit subdued," she said.

"There is a tendency today to spoil children, but I find lots of mothers who feel the same way I do about spanking. There is a large and fervent demand to get back to the old common sense."
Wednesday, May 13th 2009 - 04:05:40 AM
Name: HeightsMom
E-mail address: mbhr2@netzero.net
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Loved Drooaygah's "Cynthia Visits the Spankers." I do hope Mrs. Kim bought the season pass, as I doubt Cynthia will be a one-time visiter!
Wednesday, May 13th 2009 - 05:45:18 PM
Name: Shel
E-mail address: www.Shel@w.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:i like your site very mutch i want too see also a rectal thermometer for punishment is that possibale greatings too everyone
Thursday, May 14th 2009 - 12:49:31 PM
Name: Mr. B
E-mail address: db1129@hushmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi all,
Glad to be a part of the community. Many stories to share, all true from years gone by. Most are of me and me sister, but many are of my kids. Happy to share details, but please don't ask for pictures. Many people have in the past. Long live Handprints!

[HandPrince replies: Thank you, Mr. B. Guestbook readers will be happy to read any memories about your sister's spankings. Please don't post about spanking your own children though. That would be off topic for the Guestbook.]
Thursday, May 14th 2009 - 04:43:26 PM
Name: Doo Bee
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments: While many spanking artists and authors recreate the same thing over and over again, Cannibal Khan still keeps coming up with fresh, funny ideas. Long may he draw!
Friday, May 15th 2009 - 10:49:11 PM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I also would like to chime in how much I liked "Cynthia Visits the Spankers". It's awfully close to a favorite fantasy that I have played many many times in my mind. It's wonderful to see it drawn on paper!

One small thing that I wondered about: the boys that are being punished in that center also have to be naked with their hands on the head I suppose? So won't they sometimes get an erection then? Or is that outside the imagery of this story?
Thursday, May 21st 2009 - 10:54:41 AM
Name: Randy
E-mail address: la_z247@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I love to express my opinions of spankings . would like to hear from others on this topic please e-mail me and lets talk. love all the pics
Wednesday, May 27th 2009 - 07:32:09 AM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Another question about "Cynthia Visits the Spankers": are there pictures of the form that the mother is filling out in a size that is legible?

[HandPrince replies: No, unfortunately, there aren't. I specifically asked Droo about this while putting together the zip file of his comic. His original version of five years ago had the form legible, but now this lower bandwidth version of that page is all he can find.]
Friday, May 29th 2009 - 01:58:28 PM
Name: Lessiley Beth
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I really enjoyed pictures in 154 keep up the good work man
Friday, May 29th 2009 - 06:53:57 PM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I've tried deciphering the form. Here is what I got thus far:

CENTRAL CITY CORPORAL PUNISHMENT CENTER

Your Name [ ]
Your Child's Name [ ]
Age [ ] Sex [ ] Male [ ] Female
Adddress [ ]
Phone # [ ] Work Phone [ ]

Have you ever Yes [ ] If yes, when and
taken your child No [ ] where?
to a Corporal [
Punishment Center
before? ]

Has your child ever Yes [ ] If yes, when and
and been spanked No [ ] why?
at before? [
]
Please explain your reasons for bringing
your child here today:
[
]
What other methods of discipline have you
tried?
[
]
Signature [ ]


CONSENT FORM

By signing this document you state that you understand
and agree to the following policies and procedures

* Spankings are administered on the bare bottom.
Your child will be undressed during the procedure.
* Spankings are painful and humiliating. Your child
may cry loudly, fight, beg you or the disciplinarian
to stop the punishment. For best results from this
form of discipline, we ask that you retain from
interfering and allow the discpline to be com-
pleted.
* The spanking will produce a temporary reddening
of the skin of your child's buttocks. The skin will
be hot and sore. These symptoms are in no way
dangerous and will heal in a short time.
* After the spanking has ended may ...
at the bottom will be more. They may
... aching or ...
Apply ... if needed. Do not apply healing
... at any time.

Signature [ ] Date [ ]
Monday, June 1st 2009 - 02:20:29 PM
Name: Fiver40
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi, can anyone tell me the size of Cynthia Visits the Spankers? I have a 20 mg download limit and then my sat provider shuts me down for 24 hours.

Thanks!

[HandPrince replies: It is 20.86 Mb. Sorry!]
Tuesday, June 2nd 2009 - 06:46:22 AM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Another attempt to read the last item on the second page of the form (the last sentence probably still is wrong; any suggestions?):

After the spanking your child may find it uncomfort-
able to sit, as the bottom will be sore. They may
feel some residual discomfort, aching or itching.
Apply some lotion if needed. Do not apply heating
substances of any type.
Wednesday, June 3rd 2009 - 09:44:03 AM
Name: matti santavuori
E-mail address: matti.santavuori@gmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:i like to write with people like me who like art like this. possible ? i dont know but here is my e-mail address so i hope somebody take a touch.
Wednesday, June 3rd 2009 - 03:23:07 PM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I'm still worrying about that very last sentence. I'm fairly sure that it reads

"Do not apply heating/healing ... of any ..."

but I cannot make these two words out. Handprints, could you *please* ask Drooaygah to tell me what it might have been? (Just to put my mind at ease.)
Friday, June 5th 2009 - 02:13:35 PM
Name: Elly
E-mail address: elly.1950@gmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Spanking (la fessée) in France

(an investigation of the UNION of the FAMILIES in EUROPE carried out into 2006/2007 among 685 grandparents, 856 parents and 776 children in France. (In French, results to be found on their website uniondesfamilles.org). A cartoon illustrates the survey with two parents and two children in our beloved interaction. The boy says: do you think they have got them? The girl answers: Surely not enough. (Note that dad is doing the boy and mother doing the girl) http://www.ouest-france.fr/La-fessee-est-toujours-pratiquee-et-admise/re/actuDet/actu_3639-476389-----_actu.html



The three generations all received spankings:
95% of the grandparents, 95% of the parents and
96% of the children.

The spankings came mainly from their parents.
52% of the grandparents (58% boys, 46% girls), 39% of the parents (50% boys, 27% girls) and 34% of the children (37% boys, 30% girls) have been spanked by a third party, at school, or other family members.
62% (grandparents), 64% (parents) and 55% (children) found that they were (largely) deserved (this increased to over 60% among older children).

7% of grandparents, 9% of parents and 9% children considered that they have been punished not enough, 34%, 25% et 22% too much. For more than 78% from the grandparents and 62% of the parents, the spankings they gave were (largely) deserved. A good spanking was adapted to the age of the child, had to hurt without being cruel, had to stop the mounting tension between child and adult and had to be an effective deterrent, in the sense that the need for more punishment declined after a spanking. All agreed that “a good spanking” had to be rare.

65% of the children consider that by spanking them, their parents seek to raise them. 35% think that parents also want to vent their anger in the punishment. 77% of the parents consider spanking educative, 28% admit also venting their anger.

64% of the children will raise their own children as they were, 22% less severe, 14% more severe (but 18% of older children would raise their children more severely). 26% of the children want more spankings in education (for the other, poorly educated children off course). Children that would be less severe in their education, would not ban all spanking, but would give less spankings on the bare bottom (many notes), not use the brush or martinet or limit the number of strokes.

27%, 34% and 37% of the grandparents, parents and children want to forbid spanking by law. But even these often want to make a difference between corporal punishment and “a spanking” (understood: by hand), which is not considered a corporal punishment.
Friday, June 19th 2009 - 06:50:28 PM
Name: hey
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:another poll on spanking,this one about using spanking for potty training.

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/438457
Friday, June 19th 2009 - 07:57:28 PM
Name: karen
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:new poll on spanking!

http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/438621
Saturday, June 20th 2009 - 09:54:27 AM
Name: jerry spannraft
E-mail address: tarzan5@att.net
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:excellent site my absolute favorate
Sunday, June 21st 2009 - 06:40:18 AM
Name: Charles Collingwood
E-mail address: spadraw@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://Uncertain
Comments:I've emailed you a letter providing some information related to the status of my drawings site. If you didn't receive the letter, please notify me.

If other visitors have questions or comments about the matter, they may email me at the address shown above.
Sunday, June 28th 2009 - 07:37:41 PM
Name: crud
E-mail address: a@a.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I know that this is all free and I don't want to upset anyone's feelings but the difference in quality of the artwork over time is immense. About the entire second half of the galleries are virtually worthless. Most of the contributors cannot draw and there are increasingly more bizarre scenarios including animals, cuddly toys and even flies ffs! There has also been a worrying increase in references to spanking boys. This website is supposed to be about the spanking of girls. I am not in the slightest bit interested in boy spanking but for those who are there are plenty of sites catering for their particular kink and they should leave this one well alone. As for Drooaygah's materspiece "five years in the making", it tool me less then five seconds to decide to confine it permanently to the trash. Are there no latter day George Jackson Churchwards out there?
Thursday, July 2nd 2009 - 06:48:52 AM
Name: drooaygah
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Dear "crud,"

Normally I wouldn't bother, but I do feel compelled to respond.

Neither HandPrince nor myself have ever proclaimed the comic to be a "masterpiece." In fact, some of the drawings now seem rather crude to me. However, it does represent a considerable amount of work - each of those pages equaling hours of drawing, scanning, coloring, etc. As I have a life outside of doing spanking drawings, it did indeed total up to several years of work.

As I said, some of the drawings now seem rather crude even to me. And it would be pretty naive to assume that everyone out there is going to like it.

But I would expect most to recognize that it represents a lot of work, and to have the class to either say "it isn't my sort of thing." Or to say nothing at all.

HandPrince does his best with what he can turn up and what others submit to him. If you're unhappy with the content of his pages, maybe it's time to either find something for him, or put pencil to paper yourself. Whether you like or dislike my drawings, at least I'm contributing.

[HandPrince: Well said, Droo!
By the way, is there any chance you could post the full text of the form Cynthia's mom fills out at the spanking center? Your fans have been trying to figure it out.]
Thursday, July 2nd 2009 - 04:53:38 PM
Name: Drooaygah
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Re: The Form

W - I think you got it right. Or 99%, at least.

Droo
Friday, July 3rd 2009 - 08:18:53 AM
Name: Alex Snow
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Let me put in my two cents worth also in reply to Crud.
I think you're confusing different sorts of art. Unfortunately, most trained artists aren't attracted to fetish as a subject so anyone who collects spanking art will have limited choices. I think Handprince is to be commended for at least providing a forum for artists. Obviously, you can pick what you want to view and ignore the rest.
Churchward is a superb draftsman and well-trained as an artist.
But according to Ron Wilson, who was in contact with him before his untimely death, Churchward had boys in mind even though he drew them as girls. That may account for the rather chunky look of most of his spankees.
Droo is in a different tradition, the cartoon and comic book tradition which has a wholly different style. Very few comic artists draw in a totally realistic manner.
I agree about the animals and so on. I don't particularly like furry art either.
But, as far as I can tell, there's only been the one reference to boys on the dreambook, someone announcing his new site. No boy art has been posted (except for Churchward's boys manquee).
Friday, July 3rd 2009 - 11:33:52 AM
Name: anon
Homepage URL: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Shitty_art
Comments:crud is right lot of shitty art lately
Friday, July 3rd 2009 - 11:27:30 PM
Name: W
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey, a reply from the great Drooaygah! I'm honored!

So that last sentence *was* "Do not apply heating substances of any type"? Really?
Saturday, July 4th 2009 - 01:59:35 PM
Name: Surfer
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I want to indicate on two things. First: this page bases on fantasy spanking. Many of the pictures are oriented on mainly this. They could remind the beholder on experiences or help him create new in his mind. For this reason they don't have to be realistic.
Second: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Who are you that you arrogate to tell what pictures are good and which bad? GJC has a lot of fans and Drooaygah has a lot too. But just because you like the one and dislike the other, doesn't mean that they are "good" or "bad".
Everyone who has the guts to show his (or her) drawings to the entire world deserves acknowledgement. It's just impolite to call the work of somebody "shit" or "virtually worthless" who has these guts. Of course you may tell the artist your opinion but you have to stay polite and respect other people’s tastes.

Saturday, July 4th 2009 - 03:57:48 PM
Name: Surfer
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Totally different theme: During my treasure hunt for new stuff, I found a few Japanese pages which contain plenty of pictures. The pics aren't (as I know) on thehandprince or AOTK yet. Because they were unknown to me until now, I share them.

http://heartland.geocities.jp/moo_n_leaf/page1.html

http://www.geocities.jp/nicoojery/topframe1.html

http://betwixt.daynight.jp/betwixt/index.html (click the "betwixt and between" title)

http://meloco.hp.infoseek.co.jp/top_2009.html

http://yukinio.web.fc2.com/10top-menw.html

http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ryu3car/

Here and there you have to look a bit to find the material but it's worth it...
Saturday, July 4th 2009 - 04:18:26 PM
Name: no1
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:i kind of agree with crud, but for me, it's not so much about having styles/types of drawings that i'm not into- like the comic, anime, and cartoonish types- but that there has been a lack of the OTHER types of drawings, like barb, lee warner, and patty. personally, i do not like george churchward's drawings at all. the faces and bodies are so ugly and weird-looking- i just don't like them. even though anne's drawings are not "high quality", i really like them because they capture so much and there is a reality to the scenarios that i like. everyone has their opinions and while i am not going to insult artists that submit stuff in the genres that i don't like, i do wish there were more artists submissions for the stuff i DO like.

and the retort that if someone doesn't like what's on here, to draw something themselves, is inane. not everyone can draw, and there is nothing wrong with voicing an opinion- even if it happens to be a negative opinion, as long as it's done respectfully. i appreciate all the artists on here, but that doesn't mean i like all the art. to get defensive every time someone criticizes a certain artist or genre is ridiculous. again, as long as it's done with tact and respect. (no, i don't think crud's post falls into that category, but there will always be a few rude people no matter what.)
Saturday, July 4th 2009 - 04:45:22 PM
Name: Droo
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Criticism can be constructive ("I would like to see more artists like Barb or Lee Warner"), or destructive (the artwork here is shit"). Even negative opinions.

I am not so much defending myself (I expect some people not to like my stuff) as the site - HP's been doing this a long time and deserves support.

There was nothing tactful, respectful, or constructive in "crud" and his buddy's post.

Sorry, but if you don't like what the site has to offer, you can either find something to contribute, make something to contribute, keep silent, or bitch. But only the first two will accomplish anything. You won't encourage the next GJC to appear by slagging others.

And drawing is a skill, and can be learned.
Sunday, July 5th 2009 - 09:00:12 AM
Name: Tony
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Droo, you are my favorite current artist on Handprince. I also appreciate all those who submit.
Sunday, July 5th 2009 - 09:03:48 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Droo
Verry nice new ART work hope you do one with her over his lap getting her just do,and screw the one's who cut you up.

I cant draw to save my ass (whitch got whacked)if i could i would post,thank's agin............Rob
Monday, July 6th 2009 - 03:30:13 AM
Name: no1
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Droo,

I'm not sure if you misread my post, but I did say that crud's post was NOT tactful,respectful or constructive.

I'm going to have to disagree with you in that some things cannot be taught. Improvement can be made by teaching, but skill and talent cannot be taught. Think of all the people who take singing lessons or dance classes and can't hold a tune or dance a step. If talent could be taught, we'd all be experts! I consider myself to be a fairly good artist (depending on what I'm drawing) but no matter how hard I try, spanking drawings do not come out the way I'd like. And just for the record, I am actually working on some drawings to submit here.

I do have a question though- in addition to some original sketches I've been working on, I modified some other artists work to fit my liking (ie Patty and even one of Lee Warner's pics- just to include shirts on the spankees, where before they were topless). Is that kind of stuff OK to submit? Because I'd really like to attempt to revise some of George Churchward's stuff, but I don't know if that's considered insulting or what. (I don't mean it to be at all- I LIKE the drawings, but I want to tweak them to my own fancy.) Anyway, of course, I love this site. I've been coming here for years and years.

[HandPrince replies: You are welcome to submit revisions of others' work. I won't promise I will post it, but if you have added enough new content to the image and not merely tweaked it in some minor way, I might.]
Tuesday, July 7th 2009 - 02:02:49 PM
Name: jim
E-mail address: agotkl1@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments: I will have to agree with no. 1 about talent and drawing( as much as i have tried to draw ( i love spanking art and all artists that can draw a female otk) my artwork is horrible and it would be hard to get somebody to help you draw spanking art unless you had a little talent in that direction. I saw a tutorial from Spank Art about drawing and i could not even get the circles to shade into anything remotely looking like what i was trying to draw and i admit my patence for my artwork is about 5 seconds tops. Droo is great and i love his stories and his artwork. We all have favorite artists and i for 1 like to see the different styles as sometimes you do find one that really stands out. So thanks to all the artists that share their time and talent with us. Thanks to handprince for posting the galleries and thanks to all who post respectful comments and not trash anybody's work.
Jim
Wednesday, July 8th 2009 - 12:59:26 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Jim you toare 100% on target with what you said,we should thank droo and the outher's who share there talent's with us,all have a good week......Rob
Wednesday, July 8th 2009 - 04:01:25 AM
Name: thx1138
E-mail address: ask me for it
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Droo,

regardless of perfection or mastership your comic of poor cynthia is just great! I love it so much. First I had - well, let's say: it felt good, then I had to smile and at last I had to lough about the bizarre szene cynthia faces. In my opinion your drawings are just the way they need to be 'cause your art lives from imagination, not from images. Wow - my imaginations vary every time feeling cynthia's doom! Poor cynthia.

Thank you, thank you, Thanks a lot!

I got just one question left: Is there an uncensored version available? I think: there's nothing to hide, so why place a black bar where nature has made the difference between a boy and a girl?

Keep things going!

-thx1138

Monday, July 13th 2009 - 02:07:45 PM
Name: Droo
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:THX-

Thank you!
Re: an "uncensored" version.

While I agree with you 100%, I have found in the past that trouble's gotten stirred up when too much gets shown, so it's best to error on the side of caution. Hope that answer makes sense.

Droo

[HandPrince says: Also, an unwritten rule for all Handprints images is, no visible genitalia.]
Monday, July 13th 2009 - 06:46:57 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:i.e. Dont get your self in the shit,use caution.
Tuesday, July 14th 2009 - 04:00:28 AM
Name: Karl Goldbeck
E-mail address: karlgold5@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:One thing which youtube can and will do is edit their video clips from movies and t.v. shows of children being spanked, especially if it is done on the bare bottom. One thing I dislike about youtube is there is no way to distinguish these video clips from what I call spanking crap. These are the video clips of adults and children playfully spanking each other. Practically all of them are so repuslive and appalling in their content I refuse to watch them and will turn them off right away. Some of them do show children being spanked on the bare bottom.

There are on youtube some video clips that do not belong on it. I am referring to one that showed a boy getting a shot on his bare bottom. I am referring to another one showing a naked little boy with no provisions for frontal nudity. And another one of a little boy taking a bath with no provisions for his frontal nudity. All of this I label video crap that should be removed from youtube.

What youtube needs is one standard for all of their spanking video clips. If they can edit video clips of children being spanked, they need to do the same thing for the spanking video crap and start removing it.

I would like to know if there is a way to watch spanking video clips from movies and t.v. shows without having to watch spanking video crap. Is there another webcite that is free where I can view spanking video clips without having to put up with spanking video crap?
Tuesday, July 14th 2009 - 09:28:03 AM
Name: no1
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Karl,
Lol! There is so much humor in your post, I wouldn't know where to start. Sorry youtube doesn't cater to your spanking fetish needs... maybe you should send them an email? I'm sure they will be more than happy to spend time revamping the entire site to suit your preferences. LMAO!
Tuesday, July 14th 2009 - 09:23:10 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:SHIT man i didnt know there was spanking clip's out there DAMN!!!!!!!!!!
Wednesday, July 15th 2009 - 03:18:56 AM
Name: Anon
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:In reply to an earlier article about the use of CP in US Schools (mostly in the South) I was shocked also to read of items in the Corpun site. Girls are given the Paddle on the bottom by a Male Principal or teacher. One school confirmed that in 2004 - 5 (I believe) one third of the entire school were paddled during that year. That seems to me to be an excessive use of the Paddle. I cannot imagine a situation in any school where a third of the entire school were so badly behaved. I only remember one boy in our UK school that had the cane in the 4 years I was there. That school had 600 kids, boys and girls.

I was also shocked to hear of another school in the South that had used the punishment on kids that were mainly in the age group 7 - 11.

I think that for any parent, the thought that their daughter had to bend over in front of a male teacher and be whacked, for what must be trivial matters must be heart renching. The act alone seems sexual for the teacher and humiliating for the girl. Now I know it has been standard practice for boys to do that, but there are 2 points.

Firstly most boys have a greater pain thresh hold, they were also more likely to be distruptive. Girls in my school tended to be shy and quite.

Secondly girls have have their personal monthly issue, which for some can bring on serious stomach pains, no mention of a girls personal condtion was mentioned as a reason to delay or stop the punishment.

I was never caned at school and looking at those statistics of the US education beatings, I am glad I do not live in the US or had my children go to their schools. It seems very barbaric to treat chidren in some cases as young as 7 with this kind of treatment, let alone making a girl coming into pubity have to bend over pushing her bottom out towards a Male Teacher who's job it seems is to whack their bottom. Very perverse !!!!
Sunday, July 19th 2009 - 03:08:01 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Christ Anon are you a prude or what!!!! and dont you dare to shit on the USofA,most of spanking'd in the south have been to young black's where life is far more different than
the rest of the world.
"God bless America .(Period)
Monday, July 20th 2009 - 03:52:37 AM
Name: anon
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Firstly, I don't shit on the US as you so rudely put it.

I like the way the US do most things, I am no prude either, maybe you want nto seen your kids beaten like this. I have sympathy for those who are treated like this. They did not mention in the article that it was mainly the black population that was getting the paddle, no it was kids as young as 7.

Please don't take offence or be rude, I am meerly pointing out that in the UK, parents would not tolerate their kids being treated this way. I am all for spanking by parents if needed, but not by a teacher who will use the paddle for what seemed very trivial matters

Girls were never made to bend over in front of a teacher in the UK, I would not allow a teacher to expect my daughter to have to do the same.

A friend of the US !!!
Monday, July 20th 2009 - 10:59:11 AM
Name: HandPrince
E-mail address: handprince@excite.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Just letting the community know that I will be away from the internet for the next three weeks or so. So if you send me an email and I don't email back, that doesn't mean I am ignoring you. I will catch up with Handprints matters once I return.
Monday, July 20th 2009 - 11:58:32 PM
Name: slap882
E-mail address: slap882@gmx.de
Homepage URL: http://none
Comments:Hey, keep it up mate, I've been a visitor (albeit rather unregularly) for years! Love it!

Regards

slap
Thursday, July 23rd 2009 - 11:45:08 AM
Name: Dogmaf
E-mail address: Dogmaf2003@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Id like to say that Lee warner is the best>^^<
Thursday, July 23rd 2009 - 02:55:38 PM
Name: Anita
E-mail address: Anita_Berg@forum.dk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I agree - Warner rules!
Saturday, July 25th 2009 - 05:35:06 AM
Name: Ratty
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Stop this Lee Warner campaign...someone here said, all other artists would be stupid and incompetent guys...its disrespectful...without all the artists, this site wouldn't exist...i don't want to blame Lee Warner and his "fans", but please show more respect.
Saturday, July 25th 2009 - 05:13:36 PM
Name: passerby
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Just a warning to anyone who has not yet discovered that animeotk.com is loaded with trojans and will infect your comupter if you don't have good protection. Kaspersky detects them - I don't know about any others. Be careful out there!
Saturday, August 1st 2009 - 05:25:00 AM
Name: anon
Homepage URL: http://sfrsite.topcities.com/
Comments:SFR chat forum gone again!
Tuesday, August 4th 2009 - 09:39:30 PM
Name: Poppadoc
E-mail address: poppadoc_1@netzero.net
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Yo prints! How are you? I myself am feeling in the pink! Just got outta rehab and am feeling 100% again! (If you didn't know I had a bad heart attack((as if there is a good one)))!!!
Oh well UI am back and better than ever! Just lettoin' ya know! OK?
Wednesday, August 5th 2009 - 10:28:18 AM
Name: Richard K.
E-mail address: ruzgyman@aol.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:My only comment is this: is child spanking art considered to be "kiddy p0rn?" I don't mean photos, I mean actual artwork done by George Churchward and Lee Warner and others? is there someone in the audience who knows of such legal matters?

[HandPrince replies: In the USA, at least, k.p. has to be photographic in nature. Even if such a photo has been Photoshopped to look like a watercolor or drawing, it is still considered a photo for prosecution purposes. On the other hand, if someone uses a photo for inspiration to make a freehand drawing, the drawing is legal. Under US law, images of "real or simulated sadomasochistic abuse of a minor" qualifies as k.p.]
Sunday, August 9th 2009 - 01:38:00 AM
Name: Alarmed
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Just to add to the alarm. The animeotk website and it's sister sites are overrun with trojans and other nasty stuff. Luckily my anti-virus caught them, but I had to CTL-ALT-DEL to escape. Twice.
Sunday, August 9th 2009 - 08:40:56 AM
Name: cinndunc
E-mail address: cinndunc6@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://www.sfrsite.topcities.com
Comments:SF&R chat forum is up again.
Monday, August 10th 2009 - 12:50:33 AM
Name: Praise
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:TEN YEARS!?!?!?!? THATS AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!
Monday, August 10th 2009 - 10:05:32 PM
Name: manuela
E-mail address: manuela29_k@yahoo.de
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Happy Birthday Handprint and thanks for all the Funny Drawings.
Tuesday, August 11th 2009 - 12:27:12 AM
Name: rerun
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:From "My World" by Rose Lintford. She was raised in Boston the daughter of a wealthy Banker.

"Mother's bedroom faced the rear fields where despite being told never to go on my own I often explored without being seen. Sometimes I would lose myself in dreams of far away countries with strange people I would befriend. This particular day I was spotted by Mother from her room and she sent out a search party of our housekeeper, and one of the cooks. Once found I was sent to Mother's room still dreaming of faraway places.

"Mother was so upset and said I must go to my room while she decided how best to deal with me. I knew this would mean having to spend hours on my own considering my misconduct,or not being able to see my friends for several days. Mother had never resorted to spanking me. My two best friends had told me they got spanked and I remember a strange feeling of guilt why I had never been treated this way. I stood my ground and told Mother it was not fair that my punishments lasted so long while Susan and Linsay's were over and done with straight away. She asked me what on earth I meant. With just a little fear but a great deal of eight years of resolve I suggested a spanking was much more fair and just. I could not believe the shock on Mother's face. She paced the room leaving me standing there a little perplexed but a also keen to know my fate as soon as possible.

"I had mixed emotions when Mother, after what seemed like hours, stated that if I had indeed felt badly treated by previous sanctions then because of the serious nature of my infraction then perhaps this one did deserve a spanking. She went into her dressing room and I watched as she selected an instrument to spank me with. She rejected one of her slippers after tapping her hand with it. Also found to be unsuitable were various other items including a rather large clothes brush and a silver backed hairbrush that must have been far to expensive to risk.

"Looking even more concerned she came back into the room and said she truly hoped this would be the first and last time she ever had to spank me. Mother sat down on her chair and after putting me across her lap gave me a very sound spanking with the flat of her hand to what was I am sure as much effect to my bare bottom as any of the instruments she had rejected. I cried and was not sure if it was a good idea after all."
Wednesday, August 12th 2009 - 02:00:36 PM
Name: rerun
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:How the Shirley Temple spanking from "Wee Willie Winkie" was originally reported

(The spanking scene does not exist in the versions we see today. It is unknown if the footage still exists, only a photograph has been found. This story ran in several newspapers.)



Uniontown, PA News Standard
Friday March 26, 1937
Page Nineteen

"Give Little Girl A Big Hand," Says Director; And Shirley Temple, The Starlet, Is Spanked!

Strong Men Wince As She Cries Out In Pain--"Ouch, Ouch!"

By Paul Harrison

NEA Service Staff Correspondent

HOLLYWOOD, March 26—-Strong men stood tense, hands clenched, mouths grim. Women twisted their handkerchiefs, nervously patted at their lips, watched in awed fascination. Actress June Lang, her face a mask of almost desperate, resolution, raised an arm, brought it down smartly, palm first.

Whack!

"Ouch!" yelped Shirley Temple.

The Wonder Tot was being spanked. It was an epochal moment in the history of the cinema. A block away, in his slick sanctum, Darryl Zanuck may have been pacing in a torment of apprehension. But no telephone tinkled on Stage 12. There was no reprieve.

Smack!

It was a sound such as will be heard around the world. Probably it will shake the very foundations of celluloid idoltary.

Thwack!

What will the millions of mothers say?

Whack!

What will the millions of children think?

Twelve times the hand of Miss Lang rose, hesitated in a split-instant of reluctance, then descended on the sturdy little derriere of the Movies' Marvel Moppet.

"Cut!" commanded Director John Ford. The camera stopped. The onlookers breathed again. Miss Temple wriggled off the elder actress' lap and giggled.

* * *

A Crisis for June

"June, dear," admonished Mr. Ford, in sarcastically patient tones, "what were you doing—-dusting her off? Your wrist was as limp as though you were waving goodbye to someone. Now let's try it again—-and spank as though you meant it."

It was a terrible experience for Miss Lang. Why, Astrid Allwyn, in "Dimples," had jeopardized her career merely by calling the Charm Child a brat and threatening to box her ears. And Sara Baden, in "Captain January," resigned himself to the loss of most of her fans before she dared to give the Magnificent Mite a shaking. So you can imagine how Miss Lang felt, haying to spank, and spank hard, the No. 1 Box-Office Star of the World.

It was, indeed, a rather difficult decision for everybody. When Big Boss Zanuck saw the rushes of "Wee Willie Winkle," he pondered over a which an intractable Miss Temple, having fallen in a mud-puddle and trampled a petunia bed, was merely reprimanded by her screen mother, Miss Long. "Doesn't ring true. Do something about it," said Zanuck.

"Do something about it," echoed a Zanuck assistant.

"Do something about it," ordered Producer Gene Markey.

"Gotta do something about it," mourned Director Ford.

"I know what I'd do about it," volunteered Shirley Temple's mother. "I'd turn the child over my knee and give her a good spanking."

* * *

Spank Her!

So they put it up to Zanuck. He said, "Okay, spank her."

"Spank her." echoed his assistant.

"Spank her," said Markey to Ford.

"Spank her," said Ford to June Lang.

So June spanked her. It was agreed that there should be 12 smacks, with the Super Mite counting them aloud, thus: "...six, seven-—ouch!—-nine—-ouch!-—ten, eleven, twelve."

Of course there were no rehearsals. It was assumed that Miss Lang knew how to administer a spanking, and certainly Miss Temple knew how to receive one. She has had her share of them. Mrs. Temple makes no secret of the fact that Shirley, "just an ordinary little girl after all," has required some physical discipline now and then.

After Miss Lang's unenthusiastic performance on the first take, Mama Temple, who had been watching
without a twinge of misgivings, said to the elder actress: "Go ahead and smack her. She's strong and healthy."

* * *

"Or Scarcely"

Just before the camera was ready to grind again. Director Ford stepped into the scene where Shirley
already was sprawled across the lap of Miss Lang. Over them hovered a microphone. He gave Shirley
a single, brisk spank. "Okay sound?" he asked the technician at the control board.

"Okay," said the sound man.

"Roll 'em." ordered Ford. "And June, dear, remember that you're trying to punish the child."

The camera rolled and Miss Lang began to spank. She was a little more used to it now, and fortified
by the reassurances of Main a Temple. The Lang wrist was not limp this time. She really laid it on. As she counted the blows, Miss Temple added a couple of heartfelt ouches.

"Cut!" said Ford. "That's swell."

The Super Starlet giggled again.

Then she went to Miss Lang, who was limp. "Don't feel bad." pleaded Shirley. "It didn't hurt at all. Or scarcely."

Surely that can't be Shirley, in that undignified position across Actress June Lang's knee. But it is--and filmland's Marvel Moppet is BEING SPANKED! Imagine, applying the disciplinary palm to the No. 1 Box-Office Star of the World. But don't be alarmed; it's only a scene from Shirley's latest picture, in which she gets her come-uppanance for falling into a mud-puddle, and trampling a petunia bed.

Wednesday, August 12th 2009 - 02:06:04 PM
Name: Qlql
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:TEN YEARS!!! Congratulations, Handprince! Keep going!
Thursday, August 13th 2009 - 02:23:56 AM
Name: vb
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:10 years! Wow... World has changed a lot all those years. Good luck for next 10!
Sunday, August 16th 2009 - 02:08:53 PM
Name: hardhand12000
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Thank for all the work HP. Congrats on 10 years!

PS- Lee Warner is the best!
Thursday, August 20th 2009 - 12:31:28 PM
Name: Carlos Marino
E-mail address: sucarlos91@hotmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Congrats by 10 years. I,ve been viseted this wonderful site since 1999. Good luck at next 10 years.
Thursday, August 20th 2009 - 06:55:45 PM
Name: LOU Nesko
E-mail address: Tazgirls69
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Love it
Sunday, August 23rd 2009 - 01:30:04 AM
Name: LOU Nesko
E-mail address: Tazgirls69
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Love 2 hear from spanking fans especially Doms
Sunday, August 23rd 2009 - 01:34:16 AM
Name: Mr. T
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:10 Years?? Congratulations Handprince! After a few years of me just tripping up on a few pictures or pieces of news, I found my way to this fantastic page, with hundreds of pics, stories and videos! You can imagine how I felt and how less sleep I got in those days. Therefore: Thank you for all your work, thank you for feeding our fetish and thank you for my sleepless nights on your page. I look forward to the next 10 years.
Sunday, August 23rd 2009 - 02:24:45 PM
Name: D
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:thanks for the link to paul Summers website.

I came across a book called "spite Fences". Good story so far and it has some spanking references/descriptions in it. One of the more intersting lines (from the main Character maggie): Momma gave complements like she gave spankigns, with the back of ehr hand.

Maggie's Mom isn't the nicest person in the world howwever. Maggie relates one instance when she was spanked for drinking form the wrong water fountain (this was during segregation). A more burtal incident occured when maggie's little sister ahd ehr doll destroyed by a mean neighbour. Maggie's Mom beat her with a rose bush branch on teh hands/face and upper arms.

D
Thursday, September 3rd 2009 - 11:05:30 AM
Name: Robbie
E-mail address: robbie6447@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:,I truly love this sight ever since I came upon it awhile back looking for spanking material and return to it from time to time comforted that my proclivities are not that unique. I've been excited about spanking for as long as I can recall (heard that before?) and although I feared the realization of a spanking and never courted one I was always stimulated by the meer mention of one and never missed an oppertunity to witness any (which were numerous in my life until I left home as a young adult). We lost our birth mother when my twin and I were five and my older sister was eight/nine and dad remarried within the year. Our lives experienced a culture shock from the first time we met Victoria. We were reared up to that time in a fairly permissive atmosphere dad being a mush and mom frail and weak and loving, we did pretty much what we wanted with minor constraints. The first inkling that life was about to change was when she and dad were dating for awhile and planned a night out She brought her daughter Beth(7) and had her younger sister (Aunt Patricia) stay over and sit for us. Dad gave his usual and benign admonishment "To be good and don't give Patricia any trouble". It was then Victoria established herslf in our lives and set the tone for the rest of our lives by establishing the ground rules. With a hand on a hip pose she said for our benefit, "You let me know who gives you any trouble and I'll see to it she or he will be a very, very sorry little girl or boy". "Bedtime is eight o'clock". Lainsy,my older sister protested to dad who said, "OK 9:00 but no later". Our future mother just glared at dad and Lorraine and said' "Fine, but you'll be in your pajamas by eight"! "No discussion, Let's go". Lainsey went on a tirade, saying outloud what we three felt. She wasn't our mother and how is she gonna make us sorry and... Patricia calmed Lainsy down by telling us how much Victoria cares for us and talks about us from the first time she met us and hopes we will be close in the future,like she knew something we didn't. She also said that that she and all her sisters were raised very strictly and as Beth can tell you that's how Victoria is very old fashioned and if she tells you to do something you better do it. She joked with us a little but said something that set me off even at that age. "After supper I want everybody in there PJs". "But it's not 8:00" I sort of whined. Do you want me to get the paddle and put you across my knee AND report to Victoria you didn't listen to me"? "You won't sit comfortably for a week, she said sort of jokingly. I gulped and had a feeling I couldn't explain. "No" I weakly said. "Good we're all on the same page", I remember her saying. Patricia actually let Lorraine stay up and keep her company but the younger one were sent up at eight with no argument. I tip toed into Linda's (my twin) room where Beth was and started asking questions if she was spanked and if it hurt alot. She said her mother was strict and she had lots of rules to follow but she wasn't mean and only got punished when she was bad and didnt't listen. I asked her how she was spanked and she told us she usually gets it on her panties but if she was very bad or did the same thing again she got it "panties down". I wanted to ask a whloe lot more but aunt Patty came up and asked what I was doing in the girl's room when Beth said I just wanted to know about mommy's spanking. Our future aunt said,"If your're not asleep in ten minutes I wouldn't need anybody to tell me about spanking we would all be gettinng a big one". She took my hand and placed me back in bed with a final warning not to get out again. In the morning we got up to Patricia making breakfast and telling us to be very quiet as Victoria and dad came in very late. It was Saturday and there was morning TV. Lorraine said she wanted to visit her friend but Patricia said wait for dad to get up she thinks he might have something to tell us. Lainsey sulked as usual and we the younger ones were told to keep it down a few times. It was after 11:00 when dad and Victoria came out of the master bedroom. Dad gathered us together and said , "I have something terrific to tell you, I asked Vickie to marry me and she said yes,but only if I can be a real mother to Lorraine, Robert and Linda and I'll be a real father to Beth". We'll be a family again,a bigger and better one. Victoria then spoke and expressed her love for Stanley and all of us as her wedding gift.We were stunned and non plus but it was bound to happen anyway and we were kids. Victoria moved in that week a few things at a time in advance of the wedding. She stated setting up the kitchen and hung up a message board on a entry wall. While we were there (the children), she took out of a box of supplies a paddle with hole drilled in a pattern and was about to hang it from the board when she patted her palm with it and said, "Make no mistake from this time forth,I'm the one in charge if I have to repeat myself I'll give you something to think about the next time you have a problem listening Beth knows already what I expect". "Lets hope it just hangs there as a reminder". My knees buckled I was hooked. Frieghtened and facinated at the same time. Lainsey was the first of us to find out first hand what mother was all about. She failed to come home after school,didn't call and missed supper in the bargain. To compound her crimes when our mother to be was questioning and berrating her she was giving her attitude. The next words out of our future moms mouth was,"This is long overdue"! She grabbed lainsey by an arm turned her around and smacked the paddle hard several times,the dragged her to the master bed room slammed the door and all hell broke loose. It sounded like gun shots and my big sister was screaming from the begining. Making promises of best behavior and begging fo it to stop. When she was led out of the room she was a sobbing snot dripping wreck. She was without her school skirt just in white panties and a blouse. She was mad to face the wall in the den where from the back her panties appeared pink and her upper legs were a bright red. She was told to sand at attention stop rubbing her bottom and think about what just happened. When dad came home he was told what she did Lainsey cried to him that she had no right doing this but dad said victoria was in charge. I stayed free from mother's ire until after the wedding when Linda and I during a an imposition form of grounding she called in sight where she has to have an eye on you at all times. So if she has to go shopping so do you. If your told to stay put you had best do just that. I had wandered away and didn't respond to her calls. When she finally got a hold of me she pronounce sentence. I was going to learn to listen or else. When we got home I was told to face the wall while she decided what she was going to do with me. After a short time she pulled out a chair made me stand in front of her she unbuckled my pants pulled down my underpants put me across her lap and spanked me until I was an incoherent sobbing sorry little boy and that was just with her hand. I'd never want to experience the paddle. I was made to face the wall again with my bare red bottom on display sincerely promising never to disobey her again. We were subject to mother's punishments until we were on our own. They were humiliating planned to be embarrassing and as we got older and not neccessarily wiser it was adjusted accordingly. Lorraine was last spanked by mom for a freespeech protest and sit-in. Mother's creative response was she was made to sit on a blistered bottom in cotton panties and a tee shirt with a bar of soap in her mouth. I think the panties had Bengay on the seat. She was a sophomore in college. She was even punished in he senior year when she argued with mom about spring break but wasn't spanked. She was just made to be in bed by 8:00 for the entire vacation. I was last spanked by her for sneaking off to a party after being specifically told I was not to leave the house. She caught me sneakin back in. I was told to get ready for bed that she would talk to me in the morning. She changed her mind and dragged me by the hair to the pool house. I go the belt paddle and was even made to go acrooss her lap for a question and answer period I was 16 at the time and had to cut gym class for two weeks the marks were so sore. I never disobeyed her again all it took was a reminder that we would have another 'talk'.






Monday, September 7th 2009 - 02:55:37 AM
Name: Robbie
E-mail address: robbie6447@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Collegeboy's work really hits home for me. His scenarios and situations he depicts are both memory initiating and comforting not to mention somewhat erotically stimulating. Why(?),I don't Know,I'm wired that way. We were (my sisters and me)raised in a matersupremic enviorment where the 'If'word was used a lot and mother's rules were not to be questioned. His depiction of older 'children' still subject to 'oldfashioned' remedies was not a foreign concept or practice in our home. "As long as you live under my roof" was a mantra. The embarrassment and humiliation she caused us whether out of a sense of justice or an outgrowth of her obcession with control was just another suitcase of baggage all of us carry, and I use as another tool of stimulation. Some of Cb's illustrations are analogous to experiences in my life. For example he shows in one of his drawings an older boy being led up the stairs by his mother to be punished. This is close to an episode in my life that left me scarified in more than one way. His depiction of young adults that are still spanked may be a rarity as it was the ultimate weapon in mother's arsenal of punishments she employed it was not out of the realm of my experience. My Aunt Patricia, Mother's younger sister was still subject to her parents control that included spankings and groundings as punishment for breaches in behavior even though she was in her twenties and a working girl in a law office, unfortunately she still lived at home. There was a time when our stepmother and father went on a business trip together and left us in her parents watch for four days. On the second night of our stay Patricia came in about 2:30 in the A.M. There was alot of loud talking going on downstairs that ended with Patricia angrily, almost yelling, "Fine, I get I'm grounded"!! And she stomped up the stairs and slammed her door. Everybody was up and out now wanting to know what was happening. Our stepgrandparents were at the bottom of the stairs and Dan was calling for his daughter "To get back down here this instant"! Grandmother tried to shoo us back to bed but Grandpa said the howling Patty is going to do will "wake the dead". Patty was fetched by her mother as she didn't respond to her father's command. She was led by the arm by grandmother and brought in front of her father who was seated in a dining room chair brought into the living room.When Patricia saw the paddle in her father's hand she started crying and appologizing. Beth started pulling everyone watching from the steps and acting the roll of big sister made us go to our rooms. I remember hearing Patty pleading as she sounded just like one of us and begging for it not to be on the bare. From the sounds coming from the room Patricia's request was denied. And as predicted by Dan Patty's screams and howls kept everyone up. It ended after about 10 or 12 minutes and I couldn't help but think our mother was subject to this gave me solice and a little insight. She was brought back upstairs and back into her bedroom by her mother who said,"You and I will discuss the rest of your punishment tommorrow, good-night". Everything was quite in the house again save for the sounds of sobbing that came from Patty's room. In a little while I had an urgency to pee so I got up to go to the bathroom. I walked in to lighted room. Aunt Patricia was standing by the sink in front of the full length dressing mirror holding a soaked towel to her purple colored backside. She was dressed or rather undressed in a bra and girdle and stockings. Her girdle and panties were around her knees. When she saw me she turned her back me and hobbled further away and in a hoarse loud whisper asked rhetorically, "What the hell are you doing here,Get Out"! "I have to pee" "I didn't know you were in here". "Wow"!"You got it good". "You think so",I was going to show everyone at work and get a concensus" she said sarcastically feeling a little more at ease at my presence as I went over to the bowl past her. "Could you turn away",I said. "like you got something I haven't seen". "Well it wasn't mine". "Grow-up", she said back. The urge grew too much for me so I did my best to sheild any view. Something else grew too and it was making it difficult to pee. She said something about how much time I was taking and said as I remember, "Enjoy yourself" and went back to ministering to her wounds. I left and got into bed but couldn't sleep. I couldn't get Patricia off of my mind. I wished our mother got it this bad so she would know what it feels like. This thought haunted my dreams forever.
Tuesday, September 8th 2009 - 04:32:41 PM
Name: Pigtails Spanked
E-mail address: young_spanked@yahoo.co.uk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi, I was wondering if anyone does commission drawings? I like those similar to Lee Warner's drawings in colour and would love to hear from anyone who can draw like that for me for a price obviously! Please email me :)

Thanks!
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 - 02:55:04 PM
Name: katze
E-mail address: katzenpaul1@aol.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:hi friends
does somebody know news about nazhdak ?
please share if so and thx in advance..

rgds
Friday, September 11th 2009 - 10:21:23 AM
Name: andy
E-mail address: andyfa@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:hi
Friday, September 11th 2009 - 10:39:34 AM
Name: andy
E-mail address: andyfa@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:hi friends
i can't access "King's Dungeon" community,what is the problem?
Friday, September 11th 2009 - 10:48:26 AM
Name: Polly Jean
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey handprints when are going to see more drawings i havent seen any of your drawings lately
Friday, September 11th 2009 - 06:05:21 PM
Name: Screemer
E-mail address: ---------------------
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi everyone!!!!!

It's good to see that Handprints is still up and running! Time flyes by fast. I like this site a lot!

About the russian page... I saw some one wanting info on it, well it's down, and I hope that it will stay that way!!!!

Best wishes to all!!
Saturday, September 12th 2009 - 07:28:15 AM
Name: Dr. Spoon
Homepage URL: http://voy.com/221405/
Comments:New Corporal Punishment support form

http://voy.com/221405/
Sunday, September 13th 2009 - 03:13:40 AM
Name: Pigtails Spanked
E-mail address: young_spanked@yahoo.co.uk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi everyone! Does anyone know any other good spanking drawing forums or places which have similiar art to Lee Warner's? Schoolgirl scenes are of particular interest but any ideas and/or emails would be welcome. Thanks :)
Sunday, September 13th 2009 - 05:08:25 AM
Name: anon
Homepage URL: http://www.sophieblackall.com/spanking.html
Comments:http://www.sophieblackall.com/images/sb%20children/blackall.spanking.jpg
Monday, September 14th 2009 - 04:28:33 PM
Name: KKen
E-mail address: drgonzo899@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:A fine and divine compilation of all the best artists of our niche and time. Thank you for all your hard work and steadfastness!
Saturday, September 26th 2009 - 03:59:33 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://www.theweek.com/article/index/100940/Spanking_and_IQ_loss
Comments:Hey all not to be a wet blanket "BUT" it was in the news this week that spanking (REAL)can lower a child's IQ,and their test scores are lower than that of no-spanked kids.

Have a cheery day............Rob
Sunday, September 27th 2009 - 04:59:55 AM
Name: anon
Homepage URL: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/
Comments:correlation does not prove causation, and in all his studies Dr. Straus admits the correlations is extremely weak - they are practically meaningless - but he continues to produce this drivel because it is propaganda the media reports as fact
Wednesday, September 30th 2009 - 08:34:34 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Nice update's thanx......Rob
Thursday, October 1st 2009 - 04:13:40 AM
Name: Karl Goldbeck
E-mail address: karlgold5@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:What Handprints may not realize is their situation is much worse than youtube. Youtube will edit their spanking video clips, especially if it is on the bare bottom. But youtube to date DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THEIR CITE DENIED.
Because Handprints shows drawings and comics of girls being spanked on the bare bottom, your cite is considered to be a pornographic one and has its access denied. Where I live out of the three public places where I can get access to the internet, none of them block access to youtube, but two out of three of them deny it to Handprints. It means only one out of three cites can I gain access to your cite.

If Handprints wants to blame someone for having access denied to their cite, blame the unscrupulous lawyers who defend the sickies who will sexually molest children. These sickies will claim it is your drawings and your cartoons of girls being spanked on the bare bottom that turned them on, and it is your fault they sexually molested children. What makes matters worse is these lawyers do have a following, and their solution to these sickies who sexually molest children is to deny access to your cite because they erroneoulsy believe by denying access to your cite these sickies will not molest children.

I personally think that is crap, and anyone who sexually molests a child more than twice should be locked up in a mental hospital for the rest of their life. I myself have worked with young children and have NO SYMPATHY FOR ANYONE WHO SEXUALLY MOLESTS CHILDREN. But your cite SHOULD NOT BE PUNISHED BECAUSE OF SHOWING DRAWINGS AND CARTOONS OF GIRLS BEING SPANKED ON THE BARE BOTTOM. To claim looking at drawings such as yours is the first step sickies who molest children follow is what these lawyers have done. It means ANYONE WHO LOOKS AT YOUR DRAWINGS OR YOUR CARTOONS OF GIRLS BEING SPANKED ON THE BARE BOTTOM IS ACCORDING TO THESE LAWYERS ON THE WAY TO SEXUALLY MOLESTING CHILDREN.

So blame them and good luck. AND IF YOU DO GET SHUT DOWN YOU KNOW WHY!!!!!!
Friday, October 2nd 2009 - 08:55:34 AM
Name: Don Quixote
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Thank you, Karl, for that frantic, screaming rant about your local public internet providers' inconsistencies in allowing access to YouTube and Handprints. I'm glad to hear you've attempted to access Handprints in no less than three public places. Did you compose your message from the only one that didn't block access? I ask because the thought of you hunched over a computer at the local library and angrily pounding out your diatribe into the HP Dreambook, with the reddened bottom of the imaginary girl in the background visible to anyone who might wander by, warms my heart. Really.

Anyway, I don't recall Handprince ever mentioning access to his site being blocked by anyone; from the tone of your message one expects to scroll up to see several messages from Handprince reading something like "I HATE THE SAVANNAH PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT," but one does not. So the issue appears to be yours. The most obvious solution to your problem would be to obtain private, at-home access to the internet, if you haven't already. It's safer, and you won't get weird looks - deservedly or undeservedly - from strangers passing by.

As for the reason these places are blocking Handprints, there is a more likely explanation than the one you gave: the collection of keywords connected to the site gets it blocked automatically. Handprints is surely one of the few sites on the internet advertising "bare bottom spanking" content that isn't pornographic in nature. (Sites with gay content are similarly plagued by false positives from webfilters: for example, a site providing resources for gay teens is blocked because it's confused for a gay porn site.) The problem is dumb webfiltering programs and their implementers; unscrupulous lawyers promoting bogus child molestation defenses involving spanking cartoons have nothing to do with it. Lawyers have better things to do than write webfiltering programs in any case.

Lastly, sites like YouTube, Google and Wikipedia aren't blocked by filters because their content is too vast and varied even if some of it is objectionable. The content on Handprints on the other hand is very specific, and that's what we love about it, but it also makes it more vulnerable to being blocked.

So...get home internet access or start a letter-writing campaign. Or both.
Friday, October 2nd 2009 - 12:45:40 PM
Name: HandPrince (rerun)
E-mail address: handprince@excite.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Before I ever started the Handprints site, I went to New York City for a personal consultation with a first amendment lawyer who specialized in defending people accused of violating the child pornography statutes. I wanted to make sure the website I envisioned would be entirely within the law. What he told me was "child pornography is any photographic material which a prosecutor can successfully convince a jury is child pornography." Paintings and drawings, on the other hand, are legal unless a prosecutor can prove they are "obscene," which is far more difficult and is impossible in cases where the image has redeeming artistic value of any sort.

Photos of children in bathing suits playing on the beach DO qualify as child porn if the prosecutor can convince a jury that you find them erotic, especially if the images focus on the children's clothed bottoms or pubic area. That means that if you download a family photo of a child in a bathing suit jumping over a wave at the beach, and then crop it so that her buttocks outlined under her bathing suit fill the picture, that makes it potentially prosecutable as child porn. In the United States versus Knox (1994) the US Supreme Court upheld a standard of "child pornography" which includes images in which minors not only are not engaged in sexually explicit activity, but aren't even nude. Mr. Knox ordered a video through the mail featuring 10-17 year old girls in underwear, bathing suits and leotards dancing, with the camera zooming in on the area of their clothing which covered their genital areas. Knox got several years in prison for this non-nude, non-sexual video. He thought the video was legal. A prosecutor convinced a jury otherwise and Knox went to prison as a result.

"Child Pornography," under US law, means "photographic depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct." Title 18 U.S.C. § 2256 defines "minor" as anyone under 18 years of age, and defines "sexually explicit conduct" to include, "actual OR SIMULATED... sadistic or masochistic abuse." So a posed photo of an adult with a bare bottomed minor across their lap with their hand in the air as if preparing to administer the first spank WOULD qualify as child porn if the prosecutor can convince a jury that you find fantasies involving spanked minors erotic. Having a hard drive full of legal Handprints type drawings will be more than sufficient for a prosecutor establish that kind of interest on your part, even though the Handprints images themselves are completely legal.

Home movies of actual spankings of nonconsenting children totally qualify as child porn if you possess them and if you can be shown to have a fetish for that sort of thing. And "possession" can mean simply having a recoverable version of the picture or video in your browser's cache or temp folder even if you never actually took the step of saving a copy. Deleting such a file after you save it still leaves a copy on your computer for which you may potentially be prosecuted. Even if you overwrite the file with other data, forensic data recovery specialists can use statistical methods to go through your hard drive bit domain by bit domain and reconstruct the file and thus prove you once possessed it unless you overwrite it multiple times with random data using a file shredding program. (See
http://www.jetico.com/index.htm#/bcwipe.htm )

Back in the 70's there was a digest sized magazine which had only one issue that I know of. It was called "Child Discipline" and included stories, some 19th and 20th century juvenile spanking art, and a couple of photos of adults and children posing with the child over the adult's knee bottom bared as if for a spanking. Finding this was a revelation for me because it was the first proof I had that I wasn't the only person in the world who was "this way." But I threw away my copy many years ago to comply with a new possession law at my State level. Anyone who frequents the Handprints site who possesses material like that, either in hard copy form or on your hard drive is strongly advised to do likewise. Keep in mind that if you live in the USA, your State also has its own child porn statutes and in some cases they are even stricter than the Federal statutes.

If you have a spanking fetish and you so much as look at an online photo or video of even a posed pretend spanking of a real minor or even of someone who appears to be a real minor, you are putting yourself at risk not merely of imprisonment, but of imprisonment as a sadistic kiddie beating pervert whom the other prison inmates will want to jump in the shower and ram a shiv between your ribs the first chance they get. To survive your years behind bars, you may need to be in protective custody, which means "the hole," a prison within a prison, in which you can expect your food to be urinated in and laced with broken glass daily because everyone on staff will know which tray of food is going to that scumsucking dirtbag sadistic child porn lover in isolation cell #2. Do you think you could handle that for 5-10 years straight?

Anyone who tells you that a photo or video of a real or simulated spanking of a real minor is legal for fetishists to collect in the USA is either ignorant or lying and possibly a cop hoping to entrap you. If you value your freedom, stay way from such stuff. And if anyone contacts you to offer or ask about such material, assume them to be a cop and shun them. If you get anything like this in the mail, immediately hand it in to your local post office and fill out their form asking not to be sent such material in the future; it was almost certainly agents from the Postal Inspection Service who mailed it to you in the first place, not your fellow spankos, and if you hand it in and fill out the complaint form the Inspectors will cross you off their list and focus on entrapping some other poor sucker rather than you. Stick to drawings and cartoons and fiction. Your fetish isn't worth dying in prison for.

And I would appreciate it if everyone would please not post links in the Handprints Guestbook leading to sites with home movies or homemade photos of child spankings. Aside from the legal jeopardy of viewing such material, there is also the moral and ethical issue of supporting the exploitation of a child for the delectation of adult fetishists on the internet. Drawings, cartoons and fiction are free of this problem as well.

When I was a child, I felt awful when I knew my cute little sister was about to get a spanking. I wished it wasn't going to happen to her. But at the same time, I always felt an overwhelming driven urgent need to watch, or at least, to overhear. Afterwards, I felt like dirt. When I see links to sites with videos or photos of actual child spankings, I feel a twinge of that same urge today. But there is no way I am going to jail for this fetish of mine. And besides, I know that if I did succumb to temptation out of weakness and did view such a site, I would once again feel like dirt afterwards, at least if the photographic material was of real spankings. And even faked child spanking photos like the ones in "Child Discipline" leave a bad taste in my mouth aside from their illegality; I worry about the child, if she was forced into the photo session, if she will be telling therapists about it in 20 years, etc. Who needs that on your conscience?

HP

Monday, October 5th 2009 - 11:00:36 PM
Name: Anonymous (rerun)
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:There is a difference between child spanking art and adult spanking art that is much deeper than just the age of the person being spanked. When people see a depiction of a child being spanked, they normally presume three things in the absence of evidence to the contrary. (1) They presume that the spanking is nonconsensual. (2) They presume that the person giving the spanking has some kind of authority to do so. (3) They presume that the purpose of the spanking is to correct the child's behavior, not to satisfy a sadistic impulse. This combination is important because it provides a framework in which people with an interest in nonconsensual spankings can view such spankings as morally justified.

Trying to develop adult spanking scenarios that combine the same three properties in a way that feels realistic, rather than contrived and artificial, is difficult. And trying to create a significant body of adult spanking drawings that convey all three of those elements in a believable, easily recognizable, unambiguous way would be virtually impossible.

Many adults with an interest in spanking are interested in age play to varying degrees because the idea of an adult spanking a "child" feels more realistic than adult roleplay scenarios would. That being the case, it should not be surprising that there is also an audience for stories and artwork depicting children being spanked.
Monday, October 5th 2009 - 11:03:23 PM
Name: Jean (rerun)
E-mail address: Jeandelimbourg@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:In the debate about what is legal and what is not, you have several aspects.

- First, you have public disgust of sexual minorities. A gay teacher and youth volleyball trainer got accused by parents of child abuse. My own volleyball club collected hundredfiftytwo signatures of people who as a kid had been trained by him, testifying he had never done them wrong. He got cleared of all charges by the court. He lost his job, as a teacher has to be free of all suspicion and reasons can always be found or manufactured. He had to move out of the village to the anonymity of the city.
Moral: you don't have to do something illegal to be found disgusting. I don't know where you work, but be sure that if some drawings from this site are circulated, people will change their mind about you.

(That is actually happening with the SFR spanking site. Some postings may have been of bad taste, but I saw never anything wrong, not according to US or EU law. Public sites are governed by what the "moral majority" feels is appropriate.)

- Second, in all EU countries and likely Russia, private vids of children that are really spanked are illegal. There are three elements: giving a spanking, taping it and putting it on the internet. If you possess these, and are sexually excited by it, you are guilty of supporting violence against children. Don't fool yourself. The argument "i possess but one" is similar to the argument "i robbed but a single bank". It IS bad, and the spanking any judge of USA or EU will give you is truly deserved.

- And third, there is the large grey area in between... The law has always to be interpreted, but that interpretation is unlikely to be supportive, because of problem 1: people find you disgusting.

Grey areas are some youtube vids of play spankings, spankings taped by children for fun, etc. They have to lack sexual intent and be clearly innocent, but they can be used for sexual stimulation. If you have a website with dozens of these, I wish you good luck, but pray to have that good luck.

Grey areas are also virtual pornography, and for example Lee Warner drawings of the HP site may be considered illegal, after malevolent interpretation and in some EU countries. Lawyers and even some very decent journals protest against the concept of "virtual pornography", as it can be stretched to include the catalog of medieveal paintings of the genitals of the child Jesus. Always remember, interpretation will not be benevolent.

You may put up a fight like HP, for freedom of thought and freedom of phantasies that are harmless to true children (who by the way are far more harmed by negligent education, McDonalds, too many screens and too little scratches, bumps and bruises from playing outside in their child life). But every society likes his witches to hunt.



Monday, October 5th 2009 - 11:07:14 PM
Name: Alain
E-mail address: alainx_1666@yahoo.com.mx
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:;-)
Wednesday, October 7th 2009 - 11:20:59 AM
Name: Tim
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:A true spanking is given by and adult forcably to a child. Now I know we like to dance around that fact and we settle for variations on that theme, but that is what most of us prefer to see or participate in deep down. Admit it :}
Wednesday, October 7th 2009 - 01:12:40 PM
Name: spankandro
E-mail address: xxx'xxx.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:hey why you have deleted my post I just asking where is possible to find spanking videos on nazdak forum. god!

[HandPrince replies: Yes, I deleted your post for precisely that reason. I don't want links in this Guestbook to sites with home videos or photos of actual minors being spanked. Take it somewhere else please.]
Wednesday, October 7th 2009 - 05:47:12 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey Khan nice new art work THANK'S
Thursday, October 8th 2009 - 04:13:38 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey spankandro maybe it was something like your email?????
what do you think!!!!!!!!!!

P.S. who can we trust ??????
Thursday, October 8th 2009 - 04:22:11 AM
Name: Sledge2071
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey! Suni got #2 correct in CK pic 180 "Red Marks!"
91 x 2 = 182

An appeal! I demand an Appeal!
And a corndog, I want a corn dog too.
Thursday, October 8th 2009 - 06:34:02 AM
Name: Cannibal Khan
E-mail address: cannibalkhan2@hotmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Good eye, Sledge...I was wondering who was gonna catch that!
There's a second hidden gag in that one...more of a verbal trick.

You corndog is in the mail.
Thursday, October 8th 2009 - 09:15:37 AM
Name: Tim
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hey Cannibal Khan, thanks for the pics. They are really good. When you first started posting I didn't like the style of drawing (though that is just a personal preference) but I'm beginning to see how good the pics are. Your humor adds a lot. Keep it up!
Thursday, October 8th 2009 - 01:59:01 PM
Name: LBK
E-mail address: littlebigchild@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Tim,

I'm not sure if you are saying that we would all really like to see that sort of material, but can't get it. Or that such material would be what we liked, if it didn't repulse us more than it turned us on. I will admit that in the distant past I download such material. I watched it once, then wanted throw up. That anyone would do that kind of thing to a child for his own or another's enjoyment literally sickens me. It is not what "I really want to see." It is, in fact, what I really want to see wiped off the face of the planet.

What I want to see is as realistic reproduction of such a scene as possible that I can still stand to look at. Some of what I can stand to look at may even technically be illegal. (Mainstream actors, although I often find adult actors are better at portraying children during a spanking.) But the "real" thing. No thank you.
Friday, October 9th 2009 - 07:49:21 AM
Name: JB
E-mail address: burford55@gmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Excellent site, keep up the good work. I would like to commission some custom spanking art. One of my favourite artists is Jay Em whose e-mail addresses are not working. Any suggestions or reccomendations most welcome.

Friday, October 9th 2009 - 10:20:54 AM
Name: Screemer
E-mail address: ---------------
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi Every one!

I must say that I really enyoy the Handprintz site.
I must compliment you Hand, on your hard resolve not to permit links to "BAD" sites!

Recently how ewer, I got a little disturbed, one person on the forum asked about the Nahzdak site, and their video clips...

I emidietlly searched Google for Nahzdak, becouse I wanted to se if it was reactivated, as they said they would... BUT found NOTHING that was that forum. I was against that forum ewer since I saw it when it was active, but it seems that it's not.

Now my question is... Is this page back upp?? And if so.. Damn..


Best wishes to all!

Sunday, October 11th 2009 - 05:00:16 AM
Name: Anon
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Screemer, Are you a moron or just a troll? Stop talking about that site. No one cares! You obviously are looking for it or you wouldn't bother posting. You are so obvious and annoying. Go away.
Sunday, October 11th 2009 - 10:03:57 PM
Name: patsy scapegoat
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:From the small bits I gleamed from argyll's posts, I would say that nashdek is now working much more on the down low. The only way to get in is to ask someone on the inside, an act I would advise all my American brethren against.

I would strongly recommend a more mainstream source of gratification:

http://www.realspankings.com/

or

http://www.spankingtube.com/
Monday, October 12th 2009 - 05:39:43 AM
Name: Screemer
E-mail address: ----------------
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi all!

Sorry for my missunderstod intentions!

I most certainly do not want to be annoying or anything, but I guess that was what some f you thought.

Dear Anon, I do not search for that site, and I mearly wanted to se if sites like that are being shut down and thay can not be tolerated. Thats why I praise Hand, for erasing any BAD linking to simmilar sites...

And so it is!

Best wishes to all!!!

Wednesday, October 14th 2009 - 03:26:21 AM
Name: Rennie
E-mail address: reynardransack@ymail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I love seeing the hand or hairbrush applied right across the middle of the upturned bare bottom. After all, that's where bottoms are their naughtiest, and naughtiness goes with spanking the way pants go with being taken down.

Also love that Funbun drawing at the start of "What's New?" I'm a fan of F/f imagery anyway, and Funbun has a knack for making the spank-reddened backside the delightful focus of attention.

Much obliged. :)
Wednesday, October 14th 2009 - 09:24:34 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi just wanted to say I LOVE the pic by Kilo!!! I must say I like all of the spanking art here, but I most enjoy the art of baby/toddlers being spanked over a very motherly lap. Can't say why, but when I think of spanking art it is the very young yet still naughty children getting it from their mommy that comes to mind. Anyway, keep up the great work!
Thursday, October 15th 2009 - 10:00:23 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:GEEEEE!!!!! why is it that we rather see little girl bare bottoms getting whacked than little boy bare bottom's ????
anyone have a thought on this (and be honest)
Sunday, October 18th 2009 - 04:28:36 AM
Name: Screamer
E-mail address: --------------
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi All!

To be honest, I think that we prefer drawings and such with little girls in them, because we automatically consider that as a CUTE scene, seeing a loving mother or father smacking a girl's behind. Besides I think that girls are expected to behave, and as such they must get discipline when they fail to be good.

So that is my thought on why we prefer drawings with little girls being spanked rather than boys.

Best wishes to all!

Sunday, October 18th 2009 - 05:55:09 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:AHHHHHHH one honest person and i agree 100%
Sunday, October 18th 2009 - 06:43:30 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:On the subject of girls vs. boys, I think its completely up to the individual. No right or wrong, I myself like both. However I would like to see more of the little boy spanking art...I have seen some adorable little toddler boys and slightly older. And they are probably expected to be roudy as opposed to girls being good, so that justifies them needing their discipline as well lol! But either way, its just preferences. Love the site :)
Sunday, October 18th 2009 - 11:12:17 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Do you think its fair to spank all girl's bare butt OR should they be allowed to wear pantty's (my self i like the bare factor)
Monday, October 19th 2009 - 03:08:51 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I myself love the bare bottom spanking vs the clothed. And since this is all art, why not go bare bottom? Again, since its only fictitous artwork why not draw or look at what we like? I myself prefer the younger children even toddlers boy and girl as in my imaginary spanking world, this is when they really begin to be naughty and need to be punished. Some people have criticized me for this, but again its all imaginary so what do someones preferences hurt(excluding sexual content of course)? But the idea of a young one being naughty and having their loving but stern mommy bare their bottoms and put over her lap to smack just excites me much more than swatting a clothed bottom or having the much older child get swatted by father etc...to me personally it just doesn't have the same closeness and excitement of that I described myself liking most. I'm sure you can understand? What are your preferences on spanking art?
Monday, October 19th 2009 - 10:15:16 AM
Name: Red Tailed Hawk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Like Anon 11, I prefer the "less than 9" group because this is the more likely group to actually get a spanking. I do have a preference of girls over boys but it is pretty much a coin toss when it comes to good artwork and if you have the skills toward drawing then, in the world of imagination, it might as well be drawn bare bottom and a nice shade of red.

RTH
Monday, October 19th 2009 - 02:34:02 PM
Name: Al
E-mail address: a1118p@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I was wondering what the website that you posted is a couple of years ago that took some of your drawings and made them a little more extreme of the spanking of the characters. Some of them were from Lee Warner drawings, if you could post it again I would appreciate it. Since I think your sight is the best out there when it comes to spanking drawings.
Friday, October 23rd 2009 - 05:56:27 AM
Name: victor
E-mail address: ssdfs@hsfsf.uk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Spank vids, foto, pics
http://[DELETED!]

[HandPrince replies: I don't allow links in this Guestbook to sites which feature photographic/video depictions of actual minors being nonconsensually spanked. This goes double for the notorious russian site you posted a link to above. This is your only warning. If you do this again I will ban your IP address from posting here.]
Friday, October 23rd 2009 - 01:26:25 PM
Name: Vic
E-mail address: ....
Homepage URL: http://www.geocities.com/lgromovoy/FrontPage.html
Comments:Al - I assume you meant this one.
Friday, October 23rd 2009 - 02:44:40 PM
Name: Annemarie
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I have to be able to sympathise with both the spankee and the parents. The spankee should be a good child, who did something very stupid and earned a strict punishment. The parents should be warm, loving people. Therefore I prefer the historical setting, the 1950s and 1960s, when this was a normal (although relatively rare) punishment. Girls are more beautiful, but boys got a lot more spankings, so I don’t care too much about the gender… If the kid is too small, the spanking won’t be remembered (and young children got rarely more than one smack). If the kid is too big, either the kid is too bad, or the parents are abusive.
That makes age 8 - 10 the optimal age. I was then old enough to explore the world, young enough to do stupid things, old enough to know right from wrong, young enough to earn a well deserved spanking, old enough “to get it good”, and young enough to adore my dad as the living God.
Saturday, October 24th 2009 - 08:02:20 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Annemarie: I very much respect your opinion, but its not quite the way you describe. There have been many personal accounts as well as written info actually proclaiming the younger ages to be those mostly spanked. In fact, the otk position was so because older babies/toddlers/very young children could easily be held in this position. Also, at such young ages these children often can't/couldn't communicate in depth w adults, so simple commands + spanking is what taught them their lessons. And good bare bottom spankings were certainly remembered by those who recieved them. The whole idea of spanking was it should be nearing an end once the child reaches older ages. And the bare factor, younger children show no modesty(usually) and it wasn't as big a deal to bare them as say compared to an older child who may even be starting puberty. Also consider diapers, they are thick so explains why they could be pulled down. I can offer plenty more info on the subject if you want. Again not disrespecting you at all, but can guarantee you it was more common the younger the child. :)
Sunday, October 25th 2009 - 10:21:53 PM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Also wanted to clarify I'm NOT advocating spanking real children...
Sunday, October 25th 2009 - 10:24:07 PM
Name: CWL
E-mail address: chastisewithlove@chastisewithlove.com
Homepage URL: http://chastisewithlove.com
Comments:The Geocities website, Spank with Love has been reposted at www.chastisewithlove.com

Tuesday, October 27th 2009 - 07:45:03 PM
Name: Jean
E-mail address: Jeandelimbourg@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Please, do note that the gentle Victor leading you to a Russian blogpost with illegal content may be a policeman of an internet crime unit. Obviously, the self conscious pedofile will hide his IP number but the self deluded citizen who feels that he is doing nothing wrong may have to defend that thesis to a very unsympathetic judge. A conviction for violent child abuse does not look very good on your cv.
Be warned. Spanking is wonderful, but only between consenting adults.
Wednesday, October 28th 2009 - 03:39:24 AM
Name: Annemarie
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I was answering what "spanking art" I preferred...
This is not the place to discuss spanking of real children (how boring and predictable are these places). That is nine times out of ten the smack for the bottom or the tap on the wrist. Oh yes, you can do it without, as you can learn to run the marathon with your hands tied to your back.
I was talking phantasy (drawings).
Friday, October 30th 2009 - 08:33:42 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments: No need to be snappy, I completely respect someones preferences just as I stated mine as being neither right nor wrong, just what I liked. And nobody is try to discuss/debate the spanking of real children on here. I was simply pointing out some history regarding ages, as past spanking history and experiences generally tend to influence spanking art. So whatever you like is fine, I'm not criticizing your preferences nor am I slapping your wrists or whatever you were saying.
Friday, October 30th 2009 - 09:37:34 AM
Name: Anonymous
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Fantasy tends to work best when it bears a close enough relationship to reality to seem plausible, either in the real world or making reasonable allowances for how a sci-fi or fantasy universe is different from ours. (Child spanking art and stories can generally be presumed to take place in a fantasy world where spanking is less controversial, and has less reason to be controversial, than in the real world.) To me, if a child in a spanking story or picture is too young, it becomes relatively difficult to buy into the idea that the child has a good enough understanding of the difference between right and wrong to deserve to be spanked particularly hard. As a result, the discrepancy between the severity of the punishment and what seems plausibly fair intrudes on the fantasy more than it would with an older child.

On the other hand, as children get older, the feeling that they ought to be mature enough that they don't need spanked anymore starts to intrude, as does the fact that spanking on the bare bottom is more likely to take on sexual connotations. There is less of the childish innocence that makes it relatively easy (at least from my perspective) to accept what I see or read without questioning it.

To me, the "sweet spot" is from about age seven or eight to about age ten or eleven. That's old enough to have an understanding of right and wrong that goes significantly beyond just, "Mommy said not to," but young enough to be susceptible to childish misbehavior and young enough to avoid raising too many questions about whether the child feels something akin to being sexually violated being spanked on the bare bottom.
Friday, October 30th 2009 - 11:15:05 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Thank you for all of the update's they are great,i can rember way back when i was around ten year's oldish and seeing a comicbook of little lulu and some how (in a dream or something like that)she was in a shack and lost all of her clothes excipt her panty's and i was turned on by that.

Strange how a cartoon image of a little girl in her panty's can triger a flash-back like that and how back then the artist got away with it and it wasnt frowned apon.

Saturday, October 31st 2009 - 05:30:58 AM
Name: Anon11
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments: One thing that I have noticed is it seems people are very sensitive to the age of a child being spanked in artwork. While one may have personal preferences which is completely ok and neither wrong nor right whatever they may be, it seems that the spanking of younger children or toddlers really turns people off. Now if we were talking about real life, then yes it would be different and children of all ages for that matter because spanking art sites are not about condoning the spanking of real children, rather the fantasy of spanking them.
Now with that being said, what does fantasy hurt? No one, fantasy is fantasy. No child whatever the age is harmed whether young or old. I agree with the above poster who said spanking art is generally based on what can/does/has happend in real life. I agree 100%, which is why I do not understand the turn off/problem with younger spankees. They have been spanked in the past for certain(references available), some continue to spank today and certainly they will probably be spanked in the future. My point isn't to condone spanking them in real life at all, just making the point that younger children just as older can be drawn with a realistic idea that they would really be spanked around that age. So that nullifies that argument.
Next people act as if it is abusive and or inappropriate. Again, it is fantasy and not real life. And it is no more inappropriate to condone FANTASY spanking of a 9,10,11,12 year old child than that of a young one even around toddler age. If fantasy spankinf can be furry, older child, cartoon, etc...why is it so bad to enjoy young spankees? Its not, its really no different at all.
My whole point is that spanking art sites DO NOT and SHOULD NOT condone he real life spanking of children of ANY age. Period. And they don't. So with that being said, many agree that they like to imagine in their fantasy's that the child being spanked has some realism to it. And by that I mean it is believable that they could in fact really be spanked. Not that they should, but rather could be as for many it just supports the fantasy for many different reasons. Therefore a child of ANY age should be believable in art, but should be noted it was not and is not uncommon for a toddler or preschool child to be spanked meaning that age should certainly be believable. So where does everyone go wrong with it outside of personal preference? If you don't like it because your just not into it, that is completely ok and an individual preference. But to criticize on reasons like it being inappropriate or unrealistic...that really doesn't make much sense. Again its all fantasy and for fun. No one is getting hurt. The material absolutely does NOT encourage real life punishment and how it should be given. It would be different if a lady was beating a baby with whips and chains(in a drawing), yes that would be disturbing to most whether a small crowd liked it or not. But to have normal spanking art just like the rest only involving a younger spankee, whats the big deal? It is all fictional. That being said, some draw and prefer spanking art of preteens, some teenagers...we should embrace and appreciate the creativity of all artist and spanking art of children whether quite young or a bit older and extend the same courtesy to the young as we do all of the rest. That does not mean those who just don't have the interest have to like it, just not hate it...and have all others criticizing based on reasons that go beyond fantasy and what fictional spanking art is all about. Sorry for such a long post, I am just so tired of everyone having a fit or criticizing spanking art of this type.
Also I am not writing this in response to some of the visitors personal preferences, and again personal preferences are completely ok. I wrote the above post for other reasons, some recent some a bit older. So no one take offence if you think I was criticizing your preferences on age ranges in spanking art. I assure you I am not. Just wanted to say how I felt on the age range to those who argue that young/toddler is wrong.

Saturday, October 31st 2009 - 11:25:23 PM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:What are spankophiles ????? someone refered to me as one,are they anything like pedophiles ??? hope the fuck not
:( :( :(
Sunday, November 1st 2009 - 07:22:04 AM
Name: Anonymous
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:The suffix "phile" comes from Greek and means "lover," with the type of love not carrying intrinsic sexual connotations. (The Greek language has a different word - "eros" - for erotic love; guess where our word "erotic" comes from.) The city of Philadelphia derives its name from the same Greek word as the suffix "phile" and its name means, "city of brotherly love."

Interpreting the word literally based on its component parts, a pedophile is nothing more than a person who loves children. The only reason why being a "pedophile" is viewed as a bad thing is that we use the word almost exclusively to refer to people who have (or are presumed to have) one particular kind of "love" for children - a kind of love that often isn't really love at all, but merely sexual desire.

A spankophile is merely a person with a "love" of spanking. From what I've seen, the term is widely accepted within the community of people with an interest in spanking (often shortened to just "spanko"), and is not viewed within that community as carrying negative connotations. And the word has nothing to do with whether or not the interest in spanking extends to children.
Sunday, November 1st 2009 - 11:55:54 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Thank you Mr. Anonymous and now we know. :) :)
Monday, November 2nd 2009 - 03:24:36 AM
Name: Ellie
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I have been fascinated by spankings since I was a kid. I only ever got spanked twice, maybe three times when I was very young, and I don't really remember much about those spankings, but for some reason when I was about 8 I realized that spankings excited me. My experiences are so similar to so many other accounts I've read. I used to look up "spank" in the dictionary and roll the words around in my head. I've put piles of pillows on the bed and bent over them, taken down my jeans and panties and spanked myself. I've trolled the internet for clips from old movies. I know, you've heard this all before.

The reality is I don't actually want to be spanked, I just want to fantasize about it. Which is why I love this site so much. I love to look at the pictures, and write a little story surrounding it. Some of my favorite pictures to write stories about are the Cannibal Khan pictures, because I think he creates terrific scenarios. Some of my favorites are "Front Row Seat". I imagine the little brunette girl in the front row dreading getting such a spanking, but at the same time curious. In "Around the Corner", I imagine the girl in the green jumper dreading her spanking which is imminent, yet, she is quite excited listening to her sister being spanked. I think it's the conflicting emotions that grabs me so much.




If any one is interested, I could post some of these little stories ...

[HandPrince replies: Please do, Ellie!]
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 - 11:15:28 PM
Name: John Doe
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:There was this really great photo of the Animaniacs getting spanked................but I forgot what gallery it was in. HELP!!!!!!!
Friday, November 6th 2009 - 07:08:48 PM
Name: Red Tailed Hawk
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Where did the new Comics 7 (Asstd100) come from and what was in the caption ?

Thanks.

RTH

[HandPrince replies: Sorry, I have no other information.]
Saturday, November 7th 2009 - 09:20:02 PM
Name: Cannibal Khan
E-mail address: cannibalkhan2@hotmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I'm glad you're enjoying my stuff Ellie. I've been in a kind of a slump lately, unable to get motivated to create new work, but encouragement like yours goes a long way.

Thanks a lot.....C. Khan
Monday, November 9th 2009 - 06:34:39 AM
Name: Ellie
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hiya CK! So chuffed you answered me :) I love the HP site, my favorites being 1) You, 2) Lee (of course :), 3) Droo, and 4) Gaius. There are elements in common with all of these great artists.

1) The situations are believable, well, not for the 21st Century, but perhaps 50 or 60 years ago. Real Moms and Dads spanking little girls, or naughty little girls being spanked in school.

2) There's no abusive spanking. Well, actually, that's not true, since I consider spanking of real children abusive, but let’s face it, it used to happen, at home and at school. And I guess it's a platitude, but those kids from the first half of the 20th century grew up OK. In fact Tom Brokaw characterizes the WWII generation as the finest generation of Americans, many of whom were certainly spanked in school and at home.

3) The anticipation factor figures highly in all of these artists. I particularly LOVE CK’s drawings for this reason. For example, Waiting for the Cane—What is going through her head?

4) The voyeur factor also figures, certainly in Droo and CK’s work. One of my favorites is Made an Example. Middle sister is about to feel the belt on her bare bottom, while younger sister is seeing this for the first time. Brother is trying his hardest to hide his excitement, while at the same time feeling sorry for his sister. And big sister is wishing she still got spanked, rather than grounded.

5) Combination of anticipation and voyeur. CK has this one down perfectly! The Sin of Gambling is wonderful example. The cute blonde girl has just witnessed the brunette’s spanking, is watching the redhead’s spanking in progress realizing it’s her turn next. I would love to get into her head to figure out what she’s thinking. I guess that’s why I write the stories.

I could go on and on about how exciting I find these pictures, But I’ve already said enough.
Monday, November 9th 2009 - 12:56:38 PM
Name: John Doe
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments: I am SUCH a fan of your drawings, Cannibal Kahn. The way how you expertly craft your drawings is simply amazing. You make the expressions on your characters feel real to us. As a kid, I accidently stumbled on Handprints. I've always had a weird fixation with spankings, but I was horrified at some of the pictures I saw- Mr K.D. Several years later, I visted the site again. I began to see some of the pictures, and I was disapointed at all the anime pictures. Then, I clicked on your third gallery. The amount of realism simply stunned me. Thank you very much (Handprince and C.Kahn)
Monday, November 9th 2009 - 08:21:23 PM
Name: Anonymous
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I have mixed feelings about CK's art. On the plus side, I view CK as the preeminent master around here at building stories around pictures, sometimes letting the pictures do such a good job of telling the stories that no words are required and sometimes coming up with clever text to go with them. The variety of scenarios is especially impressive.

But I've never been all that impressed with the artwork itself, and I finally figured out why. I think the amount of red in most of the girls' faces (and occasionally adults' faces as well) is both unrealistic and ugly, and detracts from pictures that would be significantly better otherwise. I have no idea whether that's just a personal bias or whether other people might tend to feel the same way.

I hate to criticize, especially since drawing is definitely not one of my talents. But if criticism isn't expressed (preferably in a polite and respectful way), artists don't have a chance to think about whether they might be able to make their work better if they did something different.
Tuesday, November 10th 2009 - 10:55:34 PM
Name: Anon
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I like the picture by JLB showing the little girl over her dad's knee while her brother looks on. I think it nicely shows the girl struggling as her bare bottom is spanked. On thing I do not understand is artists showing girls properly stripped naked from the waist down with their shoes still on. I would think that these would need to come off before the rest of the clothing.
Wednesday, November 11th 2009 - 08:45:59 AM
Name: Tony
E-mail address: tonybanks112@btopenworld.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Hi, just wondered if anyone liked adult spanking, I have found a few clipe of real spanking of over 18, completely legal. usually these clips found on the Internet are of big fat tattooed bottoms but the ones I have found are of gorgeous bottoms getting real spanking. Please feel free to contact me and I will send you some clips. These are not kids they are adults.
Thursday, November 12th 2009 - 02:34:45 PM
Name: Kevin
E-mail address: woodenspoon4u@hotmail.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:This is a great webiste, and the art is fantastic. As a disciplinarian I firmly believe in the benefits a good old fashioned spanking can produce and these illustrations reflect them. Keep up the great work!
Thursday, November 12th 2009 - 04:05:40 PM
Name: Tony
E-mail address: tonybanks112@btopenworld.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Some of you may like this (Adult spanking)

http://www.spankingtube.com/watch/23f7517125db46ed1293/OTK%20Hand%20Spanking%20and%20Strapping
Monday, November 16th 2009 - 02:26:56 AM
Name: No1
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:No one wants to see your porn so stop trying to get views on your video. That is not what this site is for. So pathetic.
Wednesday, November 18th 2009 - 02:34:39 AM
Name: Tony
E-mail address: tonybanks112@btopenworld.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I do not intend to leave any more links of adult spanking but like I said I thought some people would like it and I know I'm right from the response I have had. People have contacted me for one of my clips and have told me how they have enjoyed it. I do not intend to post any more links but people are still invited to contact me. As for you, how dare you preach to me, I have chosen to turn my attention away from children to adult spanking and wanted to share it with others, I am not criticising anyone on this site and would not dream of verbally attacking anyone who views this site for what they look at or what they imagine but you have chosen to attack me. You mate are pathetic!
Wednesday, November 18th 2009 - 11:25:20 AM
Name: Question
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Does anyone know the address of the old "smackedandsuch page?
Thursday, November 19th 2009 - 05:47:47 AM
Name: les647
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:The old smackedandsuch site, otherwise known as Kings Dungeons was an exceptionally 'correct' site, and was 100% legal, like Handprints. But it has, sad to say, finally been destroyed. What a pity.
Thursday, November 19th 2009 - 11:39:39 AM
Name: flrscnts
Homepage URL: http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/11/letters-shaming-undermines-justice-.html
Comments: "Some judges have faced charges over their meting out personal justice but have received little punishment. Gustavo "Gus" Garza, a justice of the peace in Texas, was given only an admonishment last year when he forced parents to spank their children in front of him in court to avoid heavy fines. In another spanking case, former Alabama judge Herman Thomas actually used shaming punishments as a criminal defense. Thomas was recently acquitted of sodomy and assault after he allegedly took inmates from their cells for spankings and sex in his chambers. Despite testimony alleging spanking and sodomy, Thomas' lawyer insisted that the judge was merely "mentoring them" and trying to turn them into "productive citizens" in dealing with them in chambers."

Tuesday, January 1st 2002 - 02:21:21 AM
Name: LBK
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Tony,
"No1" does not speak for everyone here. Nor, do I think he has any right to speak for HP himself. I, for one, do not object to links that show actors playing the part of a little girl being spanked. I am always amazed at how intolerant the users of this site can be, considering that having any interest in this site at all automatically puts them out of the "vanilla normal" category. I, for one, thank you for sharing (legal) links that you think may be of interest to our group. The only thing you might want to do in the future, is put a little more description of the links into your post. This way people who aren't interested in that type of content will never go there accidentally. If HP wants to limit what kinds of links go onto this guestbook, it is fully his right. Until then, don't take anyone else's abuse at face value. Nobody here can speak for anyone else's interests. As soon as you see "Nobody wants to..." or "nobody is interested in..." you know that someone is speaking for people he has no right to speak for.
Friday, November 20th 2009 - 10:30:50 PM
Name: Tony
E-mail address: tonybanks112@btopenworld.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Well said LBK, why not contact me I like to chat. Mr No1 don't bother.
Saturday, November 21st 2009 - 07:17:42 AM
Name: Anonymous
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I agree that No1's tone was far less polite than it should have been, but links to adult spanking videos are off topic. One such link doesn't cause any real harm, but there is a risk of setting a precedent that could clutter the guestbook. If someone finds a legitimate free site with a number of adult spanking videos, it could be reasonable to post a link because the scope is significantly beyond just a single video. And links to realistic roleplay scenarios where the spankee is playing a little girl (not an almost-adult teenager) would fit much more closely with the topic of this board than links to other kinds of adult spanking videos do. But otherwise, I think it's better to avoid cluttering up the guestbook with links to adult spanking videos. (Note that the dialogue in the video that started this discussion doesn't fit the adult-spanks-child genre at all.)
Saturday, November 21st 2009 - 02:57:00 PM
Name: Anony2
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:I think Anonymous said it best. This is not a site to start linking to adult spanking porn. I agree that those who come here are not looking for that kind of stuff or they would go elsewhere. Once one person posts a link, then another, then someone else starts- it strays from the heart of what makes this site so unique. I did not watch the link, but knowing spankingtube is a site for adult spanking porn, I don't need to click on it to know it's not what I want or like.

This is primarily an art site anyway. There are 4 things strictly unwelcome here: 1) Real images of real children being spanked, 2) Boy/male spankees, 3) Adult spankees, 4) Anything overtly sexual
The link to spankingtube falls under 3 and 4. I believe HP is away now, but I am sure he will clarify upon his return and you will see that I am right.
Sunday, November 22nd 2009 - 01:16:13 AM
Name: LBK
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Handprince, can you verify that No1, Anonymous and Anony2 are posting from different IP addresses?

Regardless of how many people I'm arguing against, I want to point out that saying jumping on Tony was appropriate, due to not wanting this board to be filled with links, is an extreme example of the slippery slope logical fallacy. Failure to jump on one link will not magically turn this board into an index of links. If there begins to be a problem, HP can set rules against posting of links.

Others may disagree, but I do not like people asserting their own opinion as a universal statement. I'd be fine if someone were to say "I don't want to see that" but to say "nobody wants to see that" is to assume unearned and ungranted prerogatives to speak for other people. (Although, I might add, if it isn't your thing, why did you even click on a link clearly marked as adult spanking?)
Sunday, November 22nd 2009 - 01:45:04 AM
Name: Rob
E-mail address: bnabtrob@yahoo.com
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:Here,here LBK,you tell it like it is and i do respect that.
Sunday, November 22nd 2009 - 05:53:13 AM
Name: Annemarie
Homepage URL: http://thehandprints.com/
Comments:This is written from memories, a long time ago. It is dedicated as a gift to Cannibal Khan’s narratives and fantasies. It is seen through the eyes of a young girl in the memory of a middle aged women with a strange interest in spanking since her birth. Nearly dead at birth, the gynaecologist must have given me life by smacking my neonate bottom a little too hard. It is close to the truth as I remember it, but seconds looked like minutes, dozens like thousands and eager fantasies filled the holes. My parents were very strict, but actually not great in punishment. They just had a way to make us behave. What I remember most of my entire youth, was being a loved child in a warm nest.

------

I was 8, when the coldest winter of the twentieth century hit Europe. It is now close to 47 years ago. The first cold left a crust of ice over the waters, which had an irresistible attraction to me. I adored ice. Being a scrawny lightweight tomboy, I was tempted to try the ice, but living water is tricky. Suddenly, without warning, the ice cracked open and I fell in the water. It was frighteningly cold. The broken ice did not support me. Happily my father nearly drowned as a boy. He did not rest before his own children were able swimmers. Being the youngest, and having to face the competition of my older kin, I was already a very good swimmer with a strong leg stroke that brought me up the ice, but which did not support me. I swam up the ice, but as soon as I put weight on it, it broke. I had to cover the meters that separated me from the bank like an icebreaker.
Outside the water, it was terribly cold. In a state of self hypnosis I ran home in one long desperate run. Reaching the door, I nearly fainted from the cold, waiting till it opened.
My mother grabbed me in her arms, dripping all over her. She took me upstairs to the bathroom, where she struggled me out of my wet clothes, putting me under the warm shower and rubbing me hard with towels to get the blood streaming. I vividly remember seeing myself in the mirror, a strange blueish white girl with shattering teeth. After a while I started to thaw. I wished I could stay forever, but at the end mama rubbed me dry and warm. She asked thousand times how I felt, if everything was alright, if I was warm again. At the end, I had to admit: I felt glorious, all warm and tingling as after a sauna.
“So, then. Now my time has come. Come here, you naughty girl.” She sat on the laundry box, and beckoned me over. While I was thawing in the shower, she had changed in dry clothes, brought along my pyjamas but also the wooden ruler she used when making clothes. I guessed, it was not to make clothes. I don’t remember if she mentioned the spanking word, maybe not wanting to hear that. My mother had never spanked me before (discounting the single swat for the bottom), nor would she ever after. She goaded me between her legs, grabbed me by the middle and pulled me over her left knee. I was acutely aware that I was well dressed for a spanking. For a moment, I felt cosy, warm and safe under the arm of my mam.
It would be the first and last spanking by my mother, remembered for the rest of my life. She let the ruler dance over my seat with sharp flicks. At the ripe age of eight, I understood well why I was spanked. My mother lost a baby, a little girl, to that most horrible of fiends, cot death. You put a smiling, gurgling baby in bed, you find a little stiff corpse. It was nobody’s fault, but any mother will always blame it on herself. I was the replacement kid… With considerable self restraint, she had not overprotected me, but now she was very upset. The old proverb goes, who loves well, spanks well. She loved me too much.
It went as “You naughty (!) naughty (!) naughty (!) girl (!). How (!) on earth (!) could you do (!) such a stupid (!) stupid (!) stupid (!) thing (!). You make (!) me mad (!) of fear (!). You could (!) have been killed (!) (!) (!). If (!) you (!) ever (!) ever (!) ever (!) even (!) think (!) about (!) repeating (!) such a stunt (!) you will not (!) sit down (!) for weeks (!).
That was the beginning.
I didn't want to cry, kick or protest. I wanted to face the music. I took the first smacks stoically and in total silence, which likely only inspired mother to hit harder. However, the ruler was but a light little wooden slat, undoubtedly handled with motherly care, but “on the bare bottom”, it soon caused a surprisingly evil sting. My bottom got sorer at each stroke, and each stroke hurt more. Imagine your bottom aching from a bad sunburn in a too skimpy bikini bottom, and then getting that red, sunburned skin friendly but firmly slapped with a wooden ruler. Every second.
I had to make clear that I was a well spanked little girl and that I had learned my lesson, and please, mama, will you stop? But therefore, I had to open my mouth, while I desperately needed all my energy to keep control. Truly, I was tough, but with the increasing sting, the panic increased. My head seemed to grow bigger and bigger, redder and redder, till it exploded. I had to surrender.
By giving in, the stinging moved in a moment from painful into unbearable. The wood whipping now fiercely smarting buttocks, turned in a moment in a red hot iron pushing under my naked skin. My eyes had been filling with tears, but now the snot was filling my nose and my mouth opened for desperate howls, interspersed with sobbing pleas and promises to be good for ever and ever and ever and ever. I can not remember that that soon brought out a lot of compassion. At the contrary. Mama only grabbed me more firmly to keep my struggling bottom in the line of fire, and hit me even more vigorously, to teach me for once and for all how bad could be a good spanking. Another popular proverb goes: spank once, do it good, you won’t need to spank twice. I do not suppose that the spanking took longer than a minute, even maybe not half a minute, but it seemed an eternity of raining painful strokes.

However, there was something liberating in crying hot tears. Is that strange? The ruler hurt, but half the pain was caused by deep guilt. I howled, but at least as much of sorrow. Being in the icy water, and running for my life had not make me shed a single tear. The cries released the stress and the tears washed away the deep fear. Be sure, I would have hated any other who would have done this to me with a burning, lifelong hate, but not mam or dad. Who loves hard, is allowed to spank hard.

When she released me, I grabbed my pyjamas, not bothering to lose time to put them on fearing she might change her mind and give me some more. I still remember her eyes, not sad, not angry, certainly not regretful or even sympathetic, but with a little twinkle of pride?? Sometimes, a naughty kid had to feel it. There was nothing wrong or dangerous to that: it was just a fact of life. Being a tomboy and a very avid reader, heavily enjoying popular books of Indians and cavemen, my prided nickname was “little warrior girl”. I admit ‘captured little warrior girl’ would have been a better description. From my tender youth, my preferred role was being caught, tied up, slightly manhandled and rescued by a young hero. The poor sod had to kiss me (a prudish peck, off course). I ran to my room, hoping not meeting one of my beloved brothers in my state of undress and with two tomato red buttocks.

----

There was a part two to this story. When releasing me, she shouted after my naked back running away: ‘Wait till your father comes home, you naughty girl.” In my wound up fantasy, that could only mean another spanking. As in most traditional families, dad was usually delivering corporal punishment. I had been spanked once by him, more than a year ago, when I had lied. He had asked me to do an errand, I had forgotten it, and instead of admitting that I had forgotten the errand, I just went on lying and lying till he lost his temper. He put his foot on the chair, dragged me over his knee, flipped my skirt up and gave me five or six of the very best ever given on my underpants. My dad was a big man, with arms like legs and hands like meaty shovels, and he had been very angry. It was so sudden, that even the worst pain came after I was already back on my feet again, but then I was really hopping around the room, my hands on my seat which felt as if I was skinned alive. I howled that I had been lying, and that I would never ever do it again. After hours in the corner (minutes, but patience was not my middle name), my dad, ashamed of his sudden outburst, hugged me in his big bear hug, stroking my hurt bottom now tenderly with his enormous paw and uttering something of an apology. I never forgot his words: a warrior girl is true, and admits when she has done wrong. I never lied again when he locked his grey blue eyes in mine and asked for the truth.

But then, at the ripe age of 8, I was having powerful spanking fantasies. They were not entirely unpleasant. I was dizzy of fear and high on adrenaline. On my belly in my bed, I had pushed my pyjamas down from my bottom, wriggling in my bed, fantasizing being spanked, on the bare bottom off course, pleading no daddy, no daddy. It can’t have been anything sexual. I was nearly 15 when, till my great relieve, my body started to behave as that of grown up women.

When dad came home, fear prevailed. My bottom was still chafing unpleasantly, feeling all ridged and striped by the ruler. I could not stomach another spanking. But off course, my dad didn’t spank me. He took me in his lap, let me explain how I fell in the ice, crawled out of it and ran home, his eyes full of pride in his little warrior girl. At the end, he asked, “Your mother gave you hell on your buttocks, didn’t she?” I nodded. “Does it still hurt?” I nodded again, with conviction. It truly did. “Didn’t you deserve it, did you?” I nodded, and I never forgot these last words. “A stupid act ruins your life, but also the lives of those who love you.” And I sincerely hoped for that daddy’s spanking, not too big and not too hard, just painful enough to shed again those few hot tears of sorrow.


Sunday, November 22nd 2009 - 08:33:26 AM
[ Sign my Dreambook | Back to Handprints Spanking Art & Stories Page ]

This Dreambook brought to you by
DreamHost Web Hosting