Welcome to my nifty Dreambook, a free guestbook service from New Dream Network and the DreamHost!If you have a minute, please add your entry to those below by signing my Dreambook!
| Name: | Cambriane |
| E-mail address: | cambriane@lycos.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://desilive.proboards78.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=post&thread=63&page=1 |
| Area of Interest: | Human Rights, Dehumanizing Racism, Illegal Harassment, Privacy Violations |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | BEWARE of racially intolerant white canadian cops and security and their henchmen who claim to be despots; following parasitically in the footsteps of their american counterparts, and wilfully engage in their racial profiling of non-whites, in racial harassment of non-whites, and in racially dehumanizing attempts to racially harass non-whites through intimidating physically, mentally, and spiritually; portraying their racial hatred of non-whites through causing wilfull and dehumanizing disturbance to non-whites through using
illegal wall-see-through technologies and audio-bugs on non-whites' homes; through listening and watching through the walls of non-whites' rented and owned homes, through their internet and private telephones, and through using tempest technology to latch on as parasites onto others' computers' hard-drives as well amounting to illegal plagiarism and privacy violations. The perpetuators of these evil deeds do this from the neighborhoods and from their cars using illegal equipment slyly given to them by the unworthy cops, and then accelerating their cars loudly and ntimidatingly near non-whites' homes and driving intimidatingly in presence of non-whites on streets, making threatening u-turns, driving intimidatingly right up and over sidewalks when a non-white is on the sidewalk, and throwing their ugly bullying weight around, in their shameless acts of cowardice. They attempt to judge immigrants through see through wall technological devices in the name of post 911, and use it to harass immigrants living their daily lives. Using these devices, living, breathing, eating, sleeping, toilet, household chores, sexual activities, masturbation and body movements of female and male immigrants is prohibited in the name of keeping a strict watch on the movements of immigrants post 911, that is illegal harassment and racism, the exposure of truths that the wrongdoers cannot bear. For every body movement of immigrants inside their owned or rented homes or apartments, neighborhood nonsense and harassment prevails violating immigrants privacy and human rights; whereas the their bony assed lickers, are given these illegal equipments through connivance of cops and their police state who cannot bear immigrants but only want the money, brains of immigrants and other countries. It is all done slyly, supposedly smartly, either loudly or silently; however, they cannot fool all the people all the time. As their wrong doings of racism and pre and post 911 intolerance of legalized immigrants, specially of nonwhites is exposed, north americans including canadians cannot bear exposure to truths and use see through wall devices to target and harass immigrants in north america, using see through wall devices from neighborhood and through passing cars to see through walls of immigrants homes and drive and bang car doors loudly at appropriate times, wastefully and arrogantly around for every living movement of the immigrants inside their homes, including females and males, including in bathroom and toilet. However, they attempt to judge immigrants through see through wall technological devices in the name of post 911, and use it to harass immigrants living their daily lives. Using these devices, living, breathing, eating, sleeping, toilet, household chores, sexual activities, masturbation and body movements of female and male immigrants is prohibited in the name of keeping a strict watch on the movements of immigrants post 911, that is illegal harassment and racism, the exposure of truths that the wrongdoers cannot bear. For every body movement of immigrants inside their owned or rented homes or apartments, neighborhood nonsense and harassment prevails violating immigrants privacy and human rights; whereas the their bony assed lickers, are given these illegal equipments through connivance of cops and their police state who cannot bear immigrants but only want the money, brains of immigrants and other countries. This amounts to human rights and privacy violations and sexual and pyschological harassment. The whites are the biggest criminals and terrorists themselves twisting the word of God to portray nonwhites in bad light and themselves in good light. The whole of North America is in heavy debt; however, their media fools them and the world, and they go as merceneries to other countries through their evil colonial tactics of wars, business, and infiltration, to screw the world of its resources, to invite immigrants and then to screw them of their money and happiness through racial profiling on the pretext that obtaining visa is a privilege; however following it with racial harassment is morally abhorent. Their culture teaches them to screw other cultures, look down on other cultures, and to teach other cultures that all cultures are of downtroddens and only North American culture is the right culture! Wow! Nothing more could be farther than truth. This reflects the outright blasphemy and racial obnoxiousness of the North American culture itself! That is the downsliding quality inside of north america, not much of which is portrayed to the outside world through corporate controlled duping mainstream media. While Canada boasts of human rights to the outside world, human rights violations of ugliest nature are committed within Canada itself on nonwhites and legal immigrants whom the whites are incapable of tolerating due to their narrowminded racism. All these are factual happenings to minorities who are nonwhite and newcomers and legal immigrants through isolating them and targetting them. Its a disgrace that in countries of North America, even the phrase 'people of color' is still being used in 21st century! What is the meaning of 'people of color'? Aren't all people humans and don't all humans have red blood in them? Skin color is formed through heriditary, food styles and climatic and weather conditions of snow, cold, mild, warm, tropical, hot, or desert. Are the North American countries that stupid while they boast of high literacy rates. There is a difference between being educated, learned, and literate. They cannot bear the truths being exposed to them and use their evil intellect to twist the word against those who dare to expose the truths. SHAME on these anti-christ cops who wail their sirens abusively everytime non-white females and males take showers, move and talk inside their rented and owned homes in daily routine living, in addition to having their henchmen and henchwomen, and often, using their non-white gutless henchmen and henchwomen in cars, transport, shopping centers, neighborhoods, etc, to commit these ugly harassing racially profiling deeds at all times day and night. Using non-whites to engage in racial harassment of other non-whites is an obnoxiously evil sinister humanely disgraceful intelligent move of the whites well-known for their ugly divide and rule tactics through their non-white henchmen and henchwomen. The white cops and their racial stooges should be debarred from going to churches for their evil deeds. It's a SHAMEFUL disgrace when the so called protectors of law turn into abusers of law themselves and throw the weight of their uniforms and law around as cowards disturbing the peace in their attempt to perpetuate their jobs and abuse of power. Racially intolerant white cops should be stripped of their uniforms and jobs and be debarred from all religious shrines. The white christians bloatedness has reached its evil peak and is on the downfall at equally great speed corresponding to their twisting the word in their favor and portraying themselves in good light and non-whites in bad light. While they thrive in their earthly power, when the forces of nature get unleashed on them, they shall be debarred from the book of life. So, they and their henchmen and henchwomen, appear to be very law respecting on the outside; however, they network cowardly to commit sly acts of provocation to non-whites all the time, which is supposed to be legally acceptable. Is watching through walls of non-whites homes, bugging their homes, working in networking syndicates against them, committing human rights and privacy violations against them, supposedly lawful for the whites? Who makes those laws that favor only the whites? The law itself has racism in its clauses. The ugly inner dirt of the perpetuators of these evil deeds of racism do not deserve to step into religious institutions for their ugly deeds - such as, if you ain't white, you ain't right? Oh! Really? Nicely dressed, beautiful people, magnificient concrete jungles, clean roads and lawns, sweet polite talkers on the outside, full of ugly stench in their souls, that is the cause of these racist policies that are outrightly biased against non-whites. What a shame! Most of these ugly acts of dehumanizing racial profiling depict the cowardice of the doers of these deeds in the real sense, and are done at the behind the scenes insistence of the racially intolerant white cops through their frontline stooges. However, without physical evidence, the white cops, security, societies, and their henchmen and henchwomen are laughing sinisterly at their heinous deeds and the legal system seems to support this evil through its inability to take action without physical evidence. Their racial profiling penetrates public transport systems, shops and stores to do all they can to make the non-whites feel unwelcome in their dehumanizing acts of racial profiling against non-whites and those who don't conform to their nonsense. The white cops, security, and white communities use their henchmen and henchwomen who do just as they are told and from behind the safety cushion of their oil-guzzling, pollution creating, often dark-glassed vehicles to intimidate and harass non-whites in obnoxious racial profiling that reflects the immoral, despotic, and cowardly behaviour of racially intolerant white cops, security, communities and their dumb henchmen and henchwomen who do just as they are told, fuelled as they are in their racial frenzy, thanks to the racially manipulative corporate controlled media. The whites are the biggest criminals and terrorists themselves twisting the word of God to portray nonwhites in bad light and themselves in good light. The whole of North America is in heavy debt; however, their media fools them and the world, and they go as merceneries to other countries through their evil colonial tactics of wars, business, and infiltration, to screw the world of its resources, to invite immigrants and then to screw them of their money and happiness through racial profiling, and their culture teaches them to screw other cultures, look down on other cultures, and to teach other cultures that all cultures are of downtroddens and only North American culture is the right culture! Wow! Nothing more could be farther than truth. This reflects the outright blasphemy and racial obnoxiousness of the North American culture itself! Volunteers are welcome to circulate this information to all they know to put an end to this abuse and violations of human rights committed by immorally misbehaved white cops, security, white communities, public transports, shops, stores, etc, and their dumb henchmen and henchwomen who do just as they are told in their racial frenzy. Save this information on your computers before any cowards remove it from the websites. Racism is immoral and dehumanizing behaviour that reflects the "incapable to perform humanely" quality of those who are racist and are being watched from God's court above in ways they cannot be expected to be capable to perceive yet. It's a shame when obnoxious stench of racism comes from people in so called rich countries. It's even more of a shame when words are twisted by media to influence young minds with lies. It's even more of a shame when so called authorities perpetuate racism and behave racistly and enforce racist policies and behaviour through intimidating means amidst outer sweet and polite talks. Racism seems to be prominent among so called white people in rich countries who cannot bear non-whites from other countries of origin. Planet Earth belongs to people of Earth. Highly educated people of high intellectual calibres, rich bosses and CEOs, etc, of rich countries are a blotch on humanity and their material levels when they haven't yet evolved to basic human concepts of all humans have red blood irrespective of race. Racism stems from social attitudes that are perpetuated by racist societies, the media, the authoritarians, and the peers. It's time to say, shame on all those who perpetuate racism and racist attitudes. It's time the white rigid narrowminded racist colonialists go back to where they came from. Volunteers are welcome to circulate these informations through cutting and pasting and posting these informations to other message boards for those whom it might be helpful, to be aware and make others aware about these ugly factors prevailing within north america including canada.. It seems the north american forgotten many of their teachings, e.g., 'Thou shalt have no other Gods but one', 'Do unto others as you would have others do unto you', etc. |
| Name: | Adam Stratton |
| E-mail address: | adamDotStrattonATyahoo.DotCa |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: |
This is a follow-up on my previous posting regarding the Ontario Liberal government's nomination of Mr. Raj Anand as Chair of the Ontario Human Rights Legal Support Centre. In view of the fact that the OHR Commission under Mr. Raj Anand (1988-89) was the subject of allegations of mismanagement and discrimination against visible minorities, when Mr. Raj Anand appeared before the Ontario Legislatue's Standing Committee on Government Agencies for a review of his nomination, he was asked a few questions by the Committee Members. Thus, about that shady file of wrongdoing and the members of the legislature's fear of a repeat of same, Mr Anand responded: "All I would say is, what you would hate to see repeated was the subject of an independent report, which found that what you're now repeating did not take place." (See ref. at the end of this text). The report that Mr. Anand calls "independent" was in fact issued by a public servants following an internal investigation which -for mysterious- reasons- did not (or refused to) hear from key witnesses. That public servant was the Deputy Minister of Citizenship at the time, the very Ministry responsible for the OHR Commission. Anyway, the NDP and Conservative members of the Standing Committee voted AGAINST appointing Mr. Raj Anand. The Liberals -using their majority on the Committee- rammed the appointment. Now Ontarians and Canadians have a Chair of Ontario Human Rights Legal Support Centre (a lawyer) who EITHER: - INCOMPETENT if he really does not know the difference between an internal report on wrongdoing within a government bureaucracy and an independent report (by a non-government, disinterested and impartial party) OR -UNTRUTHFUL: If he in fact does know the difference but have chosen to take liberties with the truth. For References: Please check the Ontario Legislatures' web site, under "Committee Transcripts: Standing Committee on Government Agencies - April 02, 2008 - Intended appointments" Adam Stratton |
| Name: | Adam Stratton |
| E-mail address: | adam.strattonATyahoo.ca |
| Area of Interest: | human rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | On Thursday March 13, 2008, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General issued a press release announcing that the Ontario government has nominated Raj Anand as
New Chair For Ontario's Human Rights Legal Support Centre, a component of the Ontario Human Rights Commission In light of the following background, such move by the McGuinty government raises questions as to the seriousness of Ontario Liberal governments when it comes to human rights in this province. In 1988, Raj Anand was appointed by the Liberal government of the day as Chief-Commissioner of the Ontario human rights commission. He was hailed as the leader who is determined to revamp an organization saddled with high expectations, low morale and a heavy workload, as the Toronto Star reported on May 25, 1988. In 1989, Raj Anand had to resign amid allegations of inept management and discrimination within the commission against minorities (Toronto Star, July 23, 1991). Opposition parties, media and public called upon the (Liberal) government of the day to appoint an independent, open and public inquiry to look into what is going on at the Commission. In the face of such pressure, the government referred the matter to the Legislature’s Standing Committee on Government Agencies and promised full and open hearings. However, during the Committee’s proceedings, in November 1989, full and open hearings were not allowed. Opposition members stormed out of the Chamber after the Liberal members of the Committee blocked efforts to have the former chief commissioner -Raj Anand- testify (The Ottawa Citizen, Nov. 23, 1989). Thus, to this day, allegations of inept management, DISCRIMINATION within the commission against minorities and Raj Anand’s role have yet to be examined. While the Ministry of the Attorney General’s press release did mention that the appointment of Raj Anand is subject to review by the Standing Committee on Government Agencies, the record shows that Liberal governments do not spare any political manoeuverings to neutralize said Committee and render it ineffective. The Liberal government of 1989 dealt a slap in the face to minorities and to all decent Ontarians who care about human rights through its coverups and hoodwinking and the Liberal government of 2008 dealt yet another slap in the face to same by its outrageous nomination of someone whose role in discriminatory practices and inept managements have yet to be known. Ontario human rights commission's racism, abuses and wrongs dating back from he 1980's have never been fully probed in spite of the fact that “People's lives, people's careers (have been) destroyed” in the words of Alvin Curling, then Liberal critic for human rights, as reported by the Toronto Star, May 24, 1991 ... Premier Dalton McGuinty must immediately halt Raj Anand's nomination for now and establish a judicial inquiry to fully and publicly look into the Ontario human rights commission’s wrongdoings and Raj Anand's alleged role. Only after such an inquiry has looked into the matter and issued its recommendations that we could move forward to build a human rights commission and related apparatus that are not contaminated by clouds of serious allegations and political manoeuvring that had left victims licking their wounds. Only then the commission and its branches can aspire to gain the public’s trust. adam.stratonATyahoo.ca |
| Name: | M. Lawrence |
| E-mail address: | aka_bonez@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | Raymond Lawrence |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I think that Constable Robert Rice should have been fired. Thanks to him, I did not get to know my father. It is hard living without a father, though I dont't know him since i never met him. He got KILLED when I was only 9 months old. I hope you police people will start thinking twice before you do certain things. Not saying he was right, but the officer was definetly not right to shoot him
M. Lawrence(daughter of Raymond Lawrence) |
| Name: | H.GRAHAM |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I am a member of the "British Group" as Mr. Fong stated in the article on highrise ghettos in Toronto and I am completly offended by his amaturish, unsupported generalization that British Whites (or long established Whites as he put it) avoid living anywhere near visible minorities. First of all, my Fiance is Iranian (a minority) and as far as his claims that desirable housing is occupied by only whites, well I'd like to know how exactly he researched these statistics. Yes, I am White, in fact my entire family are decendants of the United Empire Loyalists who landed on these shores hundreds of years ago and were given land grants by the King of England in order to settle and begin to help form the country we know as Canada today. My ancestors were immigrants too, they struggled to build a life here just as anyone would and when I here someone using a label such as "the British group" and accusing an entire nationality of avoiding minorities and taking over all the desirable housing in toronto I am outraged! My household income is in the six-figure range and yet when I step out into the hallway of my condo building I am greeted by saris, hijab and in the elevator 70-80% of the time I overhear the chatter of a foreign language. So, if British Whites are the only group allowed to live in desirable areas how could one explain the diversity in my upscale condominium highrise? Or the diversity I see walking down the streets surrounding my building? I just feel Whites are all too often villanized in the issue of poverty and equality and I am tired of reading articles like this one. |
| Name: | Prof. Gregory J. Walters |
| E-mail address: | gwalters@ustpaul.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Police Brutality; Ethics and Accountability in Policing |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I have a story to tell. It is a story about both police brutality and the wrongful use of information that is stored in police databases.
I am injured for life due to events that happened to me on January 2, 2007. I seek to find researchers interested in challenging the iron-clad fist of Police and Law Enforcement systems. I am a Professor of Human Rights and Ethics. My goal is to collect as many stories as possible about violations of arrest protocol, misuse of force, treatment of persons in jail as animals, etc. I held the Gordon F. Henderson Chair in Human Rights at the university of Ottawa in 1998. I am currently Professor of Philosophy at Saint Paul University in Ottawa. Let's talk about giving voice to the countless victims of violence at the hands of our so-called "Guardians." The question is this: Who, if anyone, today is guardian the guardians? Thank you for your kind assistance and possible contacts... Professor Gregory J. Walters |
| Name: | Rosa |
| E-mail address: | whitedove78@msn.com |
| Area of Interest: | workplace Bullying |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I would like to take this time to say I came upon this page surprisingly I hope there is someone who can help me with this out of control Bullying taking place where I work.
I work for Associated Brands LP the Toronto plant and have been an employee for this company for 26 years, and within these 26 years of service I have never seen so much Bullying by certain employees as I have seen in the past three years. This matter is not with myself but with a fellow co-worker and managment has done nothing despite the fact that nurmerous complaints and witness have come forth, I am a union Cheif Steward and have to say that not even the Union has done much to help this indvidual. I find this outragous it's gotten to the point where the said employee has been given numous disaplains and has been suppened and is still off work due to stress and not being able to control himself any long because he feels that he has to take action to keep his job. The employee is a very hard work so much that managment has said they have no problem with his work it is his conduct with employees that concerns them. But this is all due to certain employees bulling him. This work stands 6'4" and is a very strong man has a great heart and is a excellant worker I figure that the two mind you only two people bullying him are intimdated by him and the way he works hard and is a fast learner, the bullies also know that if he reacts to the pressure he will get fired and this is what they want. So I am asking for help please tell me who I can turn too to help this person, He will be returning to work soon but my fear is that this will start all over again and this time this employee might not be as nice as before and lose it on these to idiots. Please let me know who I can contact for help or advise on where to go with this situation. Thank you in advance |
| Name: | Mike |
| E-mail address: | howe.is.michael@gmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | W.S.I.B. |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | The W.S.I.B. is the largest government backed scam in the country and people should know that if you earn too much money the W.S.I.B. will lye & cheat to make sure they can deny a injured worker benefits and guaranteed that when they do the adjudicator is awarded with holiday this makes it worth wiled for them to do what ever it takes including lie and I think that people should know that they really arn't protected at work it's an illusion and you better get a life insurance plan. |
| Name: | zara |
| E-mail address: | germanideology@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Area of Interest: | mental health law |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | read about new zealand's fascist democracy at the stop forced drugging nz blog |
| Name: | zara |
| E-mail address: | germanideology@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Area of Interest: | mental health forced drugging |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Name: | compton canterbury |
| E-mail address: | ccanterb@bellsouth.net |
| Area of Interest: | history (black) |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | The article I found very informative, I live in the Miami area and have family members living in Toronto, and have visited Canada many times.But it seems very little is written about what black have done in Canada. But your article has given me some insight and I think I can take it from here.... THANK YOU. ONE LOVE. |
| Name: | zara |
| E-mail address: | new zealand |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Area of Interest: | mental health laws in NZ |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Name: | zara |
| E-mail address: | germanideology@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Area of Interest: | mental health, human rights, criminal law |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com
is a New Zealand based anti-psychiatry blog. The site has posters/pics/ and covert photos taken of the inside of a acute psychiatric unit. |
| Name: | zara |
| E-mail address: | germanideology@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com |
| Area of Interest: | mental health law |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com is a New Zealand based anti-psych blog. There are pics of the inside of an acute wing in a psych hospital/posters/ leaflets etc.
STOP FORCED DRUGGING NEW ZEALAND |
| Name: | Mike Smith |
| E-mail address: | mike.smith2190@gmail.com |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Everyone of these scumbags deserved what they got. That's why the officers were acquitted and some should have never been charged in the first place. Too bad it's visible minorities who are predominantly the violent ones. Stop trying to convince the public that police are racist. All the stories provided are vague and written to be self serving. |
| Name: | MALCOLM EVERETT |
| E-mail address: | meverett@techemail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://maritimes.indymedia.org/news/2007/06/19275.php |
| Area of Interest: | ACCOUNTABILITY |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Welcome to Kirkland Lake..On the mile of shame... |
| Name: | Jeanne To-Thanh-Hien |
| E-mail address: | jeanne.to-thanh-hien@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca |
| Area of Interest: | racism in employment - immigration |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Always... |
| Name: | MaryAnn O'Donnell |
| E-mail address: | nipsya2003@yahoo.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Adoptees |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I am hoping to find someone who will listen to my story and help the injustice as an adoptee and a native. I was torn from my natural parents at the age of four and my younger brother was two. We were adopted out to a very disfunctional and abusive family, which the father was an alcoholic. My natural parents were alcoholics, the reason for us being taken away. Now with my adoptive mother, she was depressive, abusive and still today does not see what she inflicted on my brother was wrong, she actually blames us. I want to know where the justice is and how to overcome that Social Services on the NWT did not care the outcome of native children... I've been subjected to racial abuse from all aspects of growing up in society where they looked down on me for first being native and then being an adoptee... MaryAnn |
| Name: | Patricia Dodds |
| E-mail address: | phall928@sympatico.ca |
| Area of Interest: | history |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I believe that Canada needs to study it's history and learn to appreciate the land that we live in. We are very lucky to be where we are. |
| Name: | Satindra Chakrabarti |
| E-mail address: | snc@grex.org |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | there should be more wide spread publication of discrimination against immigrants in Canada - the reason is, we need to convince prospective immigrants with some sort of documentary film or a movie depicting the plight of immigrants here. The measure of success would be felt only when the number of immigrants could be drastically reduced -especially the number of qualified, educated professionals who land up here only to end their lives doing factory lobour jobs, odd jobs and the like where it is hard to find a native Canadian. |
| Name: | mark everingham |
| E-mail address: | markiemark@rogers.com |
| Area of Interest: | rental discrimination |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Dear Dreamhost.com; I don't know what to do about this racism, going on in my apartment. The Superintenant in my building has allowed racial slurs to continue echoing out of his apartment's 2nd. floor window, at fellow minorities who live here.
My name is mark Everingham, I am a 42 year old white male. My girlfriend is a young black female, who attends college with me. The superintendant in this 8 apartment dwelling is unfortionately, also my roommate. The situation here is like this, we both share this 2 bedroom apartment in Scarborough, Ont. The superintendant here became the super well after we moved both moved in here 6 years ago. This makes for a very high pressured situation for me. He has called my lady a "Nigger whore" right to my face! Help ME! Please! As I know he wants me to resort to violence in order to have me thrown out, but I'm to big of a man for this. Another black tenant in this building, has also experienced racial slurs, only for the way he dresses. I'll admit that the superintendant did not say this himself, but the slur did come from one of the Super's friends, who was visiting him at the time. Even though this building is very small, I have attempted to organize a tenant association, as there's strength in numbers. After reading your web site, I see that you have offered some great advice and direction in helping people stamp out racism everywhere. Please! help me too! If my E-Mail doesnt work, my phone number is 416-219-0504. |
| Name: | Karen |
| E-mail address: | karenlmurphy5@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | Human Rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | My father is Leander Savoury. He was shot by Toronto Police. I just want to honour his memory. His Birthday is tomorrow May 5th. I miss him very much. It's very important to try our best to stop racism. |
| Name: | Kimberley Leveque |
| E-mail address: | sarah_leveque@yahoo.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Psychology |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I am upset and currently faced an incident of racism of the worst form. I was leaving a situation of Abuse and went to Womens Community House in London and because I come from a higher socioeconomic background I was discriminated against and made fun of and out in a dramatic dilema caused by one of the staff members in their frontline department. She made my life a living hell. She herself discrimated against me because I came from not the stereotypical background.
This is also RACISM and a HATE CRIME. Everyone is entitled to these services if they are fleeing abuse whether it be psychological, emotional, sexual or physical. I have not ever seen such a curruption of frontline staff in womens safe homes. The womens name is Wendy frontline counsellor @ Womens Community and Safe House 101 Wellington St. London Ontario. I am now trying to pick up the pieces that made my life worse when I encountered this women and some residents at this location whom treated me terribly because of my background of a higher socioeconomical class. In fact it was myself and one lady from Afganistan that bonded well. |
| Name: | Janice Gairey |
| E-mail address: | jgairey@ofl.ca |
| Area of Interest: | human rights and racism |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Name: | martha ramsay |
| E-mail address: | mmartha003@sympatico.ca |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Name: | KANGAROOJUSTICE |
| E-mail address: | lifecollinsbay@yahoo.ca |
| Homepage URL: | http://injusticebusters.com |
| Area of Interest: | 25 to 100 |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Name: | melissa fitzgerald |
| E-mail address: | missy_fitzgerald@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | I wish there was more help! |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I wish there was more help for peopele who have to deal with boss treating them like crap. I was (fired) laid off from my job but she hired 9 more people with out asking me back what help is there for me !
|
| Name: | michael |
| Homepage URL: | http://mashcan.org/ |
| Area of Interest: | hospital murders in Canada |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | If your loved one was intentionally killed by a doctor or nurse in Canada, please read my website. It will provide you with information as to what to do about it.
http://mashcan.org/ |
| Name: | janice gairey |
| E-mail address: | jgaiey@ofl.ca |
| Area of Interest: | human rights and workers of colour |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Yes. Excellent resource. |
| Name: | Colette |
| E-mail address: | crazzhair@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | Workplace Bullying |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | First of all I would liek to say that I stumbled across this web page for a reason. And to my surprise it may be exactly what i was searching for.
I am writning because I have endured Workplace harrassment, and Bullying for two years. Although I am still employed with the same company, I am hurt that I may have to either be let go, or let go myself. Iam sure that the time I have left to do something positive about this ever increasing situation, but will not give me enough time to make a difference for someone else. So I need to act fast. I have been the subject of harrassment since I started. I work in Long Term Care. Since I work with elderly, disabled, and most time incoherent seniors, I am at their mercy in advocacy. I have no qualms about reporting abuse, or even reporting instances where it could become potentially hazardous for the resident. I am subject to name calling, beligerent statements about my work, derading comments,a dn constantly in the office for discipline- can't get along with coworkers. How can I resolve this without quiting. How could I initiate change in a poisoned environment? How do i cope with the stress and how do I address the problem? Who do I talk to? |
| Name: | Julian |
| E-mail address: | jgregory@cogeco.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Transphobia: hatred of transsexuals |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | There is so much obvious hypocrisy in our 'human rights' systems in Canada. I have been struggling with systemic and blatant harassment & discrimination based on both my sexual orientation and gender identity. My experience is that it is very hard to describe the undercurrents of discrimination that lead to psychological crisis. I have complaints against my union and my employer with the Ontario Human Rights Commission, and a complaint against my union with the Ontario Labour Relations Board, for failing to represent me. It is sick how much people get away with. And, it is costing me money, energy, and lots of time to fight these battles. I don't have much money, nor energy. I have time as I am off work sick from these struggles. I like that quote from Malcolm X: there is a growing tension between the two sides. Someday, one day, it will burst and hopefully the people who want equity and justice for all will win. It's not up to the "People in Power" to visualize and develop a safer, more beautiful world. It is up to us. We have hands and minds and create something for ourselves that is brighter, and that increases our standards of living. I guess I'm tired of the reactionary stance I have always taken, and am seeking out more active, self-sustaining ways to create the world I want to live in. |
| Name: | Rajoo Makhi |
| E-mail address: | gunwanti@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.gunwanti.8m.com |
| Area of Interest: | Systemic Racism in Ontario |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I appreciate this effort in educating Canadian about the abuse and misuse of the Human Rights Code, and the blatant refusal of the OHRc to refuse to deal with complaints, especially when they are about systemic racism.
The Office of the Ombudsman is "All show and no go". Period. |
| Name: | Shamsuddin Ali |
| E-mail address: | husayanali@aol.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://yahoo.com |
| Area of Interest: | Social Change |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I greatly appreciated this writing. I will look more read more and hope to visit Canada soon. Human beings go to grow up from petty demoralizing bigotry and racism. I surley hope to be a better human being this is the beginning of social change. |
| Name: | Dagoberto Hernandez |
| E-mail address: | dago@porchlight.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Language |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Would you make a commentor something for those peersons who are very dissapointed the we the imigrant of and on we speack our mother language and they want to almost fors us not to speak it or at least can you tell m we can we speak aour language and when not in order to avoid misunderstanding or not a realy good interpretation at work or other places I will realy apreciaty if you can answer me this will help alot of peaple from diferent country thank you again loking orward to hear from you. |
| Name: | Leonard Baak |
| E-mail address: | leonard@OneSchoolSystem.org |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.OneSchoolSystem.org |
| Area of Interest: | Eliminating discrimination in the Ontario school system |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Hoping the Ontario government will soon show uniform respect for the dignity and worth of all Ontarians through the establishment of a single school system that accepts all children and favours none. |
| Name: | Concerned Citizen |
| Area of Interest: | human rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Does anyone know what ever happened with that case where the Somalian guy was punched in the face by the police and then charged. Remember some tourists had taped it and it was shown on live television and then the Crown tried to still have the guy deported before he sued saying it was her decision whether to depoert or look at the evidence. Man was that ever clearly slimey abuse of the law. That Crown was prepared to deport the man and tell not just Ontarians but the whole of Canada and then some she did not care if he had been the victim, she will do what ever the law allows her to do about it. That was beyond arrogant. Was the cop ever charged? The media never said anymore about it. I guess they don't want the kind of riots they had in L.A. by announcing int he newspapers that the cop was never charged with anything or if he was that he was aquitted by some corrupt judge or rigged jury. I think that someone should demand to know what transpired with that case. I think just the fact that nothing more was said about it is revealing. No apologies from the police, no apologies from the Crown's office for the utter disgusting behavior of that Crown. Clearly demonstrated how the Crown will blindly just go with what the police want in bias. Shows how people get prosecuted and/or deported every day when really it was them that were the victims of the police criminals. I happen to know of this Crown attorney that was sleeping with this cop named Lortie and I bet there is more of that. Our justice system is truly as "just us" system isn't. I wonder why people do not care more? I guess the fact that everytime people try to exercise their right to peaceful protest about police abuse they send out every cop they have and get more from another city if need be to outnumber the protesters. In Montreal they sent ringers into the crowd and everyone, including citizens knows that it was the police who actually threw rocks at the windows as the protest was very organized and it was established ahead of time that there would be nothing broken and no violence. The police sent people into the crowd to start violence and break windows. Even at that you know that they intended to make violence as they did not show up as "crowd control" but showed up in "riot gear". No one pointed this out to the media though. There were 600 protesters by invitation, all peaceful and there were like 1,100 cops. Contrast that with say a "prolife" demonstration you will not see the city agree to the kind of costs they expended on trying to turn a peaceful protest into a riot. Mike Harris did the same thing to OCAP protesters, he sent cops with the express instructions to create a riot and turnt he public against the poverty protesters.
We do not live in a democracy anymore people. Why more people do not see this and are not alarmed by it is what really scares me. Who was it that said; "Evil happens when good people do nothing"? |
| Name: | Beatrice D Henderson |
| E-mail address: | blessed2bea@blackplanet.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.blackplanet.com |
| Area of Interest: | all |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I read your article on Canada & it's Anti-Human Rights history. Well done.
Although I would like to see a list of lawyers that are willing & capable of handling human rights complaints on a pro bono,contingency,etc basis.Thus allowing the poorer people equal access to the courts & thus equal protection. |
| Name: | Annie Boucher |
| Area of Interest: | Fundamental Rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | The court ruling that decided that the Security Certificates are Constitutional scares me. I do not like it, I do not trust it and I think the Canadian public is being manipulated by our judicial system.
This would not be such a bad thing if we could trust the police and our judicial system. The truth is we cannot. The laws we have in place now are abused. Like the Anti Organized Crime laws that were passed before this. It is great in theory when they tell us it will be used to stop Organized Crime and Gangsterism but the truth is it is more often abused and used to harm perfectly innocent people or simply to amke the job of the police easy and circumvent Charter Rights. Now all the police have to do is say they suspect you are an 'organized criminal' and your privacy and your fundamental rights are tossed to the wayside. That is scary when you consider the broad definition of "organized crime", two or more people conspiring to commit a criminal offence. The cops can stretch the truth I tell you they are experts at it and our judicial system seems completely inept to address systemic corruption and perjury and witholding evidence by the police forces and the Crowns.The Anti Terrorist laws will institutionalize the racism and ethnic profiling practiced by our police forces. You all think it is fine in the context of a "terrorist" but the real truth is once it is in practice and the public has become complacent about the law, accepting of it, it will be abused and believe it or not it could be you sitting in jail for a dogs age without the fundamental rights afforded everyone else. I do not trust this and what is more I think that the timing of the judgement with the Supreme Court's ruling on same sex is meant to dampen the outrage of the intellectuals and the left wing. The judicial system "gives with one hand and takes with the other" all within a day. I don't trust and neither should any other Canadian who values freedom and fundamental rights and equal justice for all. |
| Name: | Vancouver Police Constable |
| E-mail address: | soryds394@aols.com |
| Area of Interest: | POLICE CORRUPTION VANCOUVER OFFICER TERRY YUNG |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Recently me and my friends were in Vancouver up from washington.
NOT True. Some officers are very sincere, and have no intention of violating your rights. One of the cops and his pal stopped us as we were walking around the waterfront hotel. Of course they made us look like troublemakers cos we were frisked in front of the major touris area. OBVIOUSLY, you were scared. But had you reported it, there would be a complaint filed on record. One of the chink officers, badge number #1705 asked to empty our poskets. We had some money and pot, and hew took about $360 from my boyfriend, all he had left. Told us to be on our way and kept the money and pot. We did not argue cos we though we would get into trouble. OFFICER BADGE belongs to Terry Yung. there have been some complaints about him, but they were not taken seriously. As you probably know, a rule of thumb is not to complain against a fellow officer. Later a search on the net revealed he was a constable with the waterfront station. His name Constable: #1705 Terry YUNG PAGER: HOPEFULLY, a senior member of the force will see this, and maybe investigate his actions. Of course we are teens and cannot make a complaint. If this guy has ripped you off or if you have been ripped off by other cops in vancouver, you should post it here, and maybe someone will have the balls to file a complaint against the thieves. NOT LIKELY, if you are a teen you are automatically considered a troublemaker. Leanna <img alt="vancouvercorruptpolice" height=177 width=157 src="http://www.leadershipvancouver.org/grad_thumbs/2001/01yungterry.jpg"> This is the officer in question. The officers name is Terry Yung. As a member of the department, I do not wish to make this information public. I am hoping a senior officer will read this or an independent investigation lauched by the RCMP. There have been many complaints about this officer, and I am sure they are watching him. SORRY, Leanne, Vancouver is not such a bad place. my apology for being treated in this manner. We want to let all our American Neighbors know this is a safe place, and such officers are just one bad apple. |
| Name: | Sheila |
| E-mail address: | swellington1@canada.com |
| Area of Interest: | Human Rights and the Charter |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | For those of you who are interested in human rights and
the Charter of Rights and Freedoms a case to study is the Jette Steward case presently before the courts. The total disregard for Ms. Steward's human rights and Charter rights is appalling. I would have never expected such abuses in our legal system. Perhaps in a dictorship, but not in a democratic society. Below is Ms. Steward's application filed with the court requesting a rescission of its August 16, 2004 order in which it declared Ms. Steward a vexatious litigant. For further information please visit www.jettesteward.com. For those of you who live in the London,ON area, she would appreciate your support on Tuesday November 23, 2004 the date her application will be heard at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, London, On. How the legal system treated Ms. Steward in ten years of litigation affects all of us. It is important that we make an effort to support her fight for justice. It may happen to you too. Thank you. Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: Jette Steward Applicant -and - 3M Canada Company Respondent -and- Ministry of the Attorney General Respondent For Ontario NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO THE RESPONDENT A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED BY THE applicant. The claim made by the applicant appears on the following page. THIS APPLICATION will come on for a hearing on Tuesday November 23rd, 2004 10:00 am at 80 Dundas Street, East, London, Ontario, N6A 6A3. IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, to receive notice of any step in the application or to be served with any documents in the application you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must forthwith prepare a notice of appearance in Form 38A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant's lawyer or, where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing. IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO COURT OR TO EXAMINE OR CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESS ON THE APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must, in addition to serving your notice of appearance, serve a copy of the evidence on the applicant's lawyer or where the applicant does not have a lawyer, serve it on the applicant, and file it, with proof of service, in the court office where the application is to be heard as soon as possible, but at least two days before the hearing. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BE CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE. Date:________________ Issued by__________________ Local Registrar 80 Dundas Street. East London, Ontario, N6A 6A3 TO: McCarthy Tetrault LLP Barristers & Solicitors Suite 2000, One London Place 255 Queens Avenue London, Ontario, N6A 5R8 Christopher C. White Elizabeth M. Traynor Solicitors for 3M Canada Company TO: Ministry of the Attorney General for Ontario 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1 APPLICATION 1. The Applicant makes application for : 1.an Order rescinding the August 16, 2004 Order of Justice Hockin in which the Applicant was declared a vexatious litigant pursuant to section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990. c. C.43 2. such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just. 2. The grounds for the application are: 1.The evidence provided by the Respondent to the Court does not support that the Applicant is a vexatious litigant or has abused the process pursuant to section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 3. documentary evidence will be used at the hearing of the application: 1.Respondent Application Record Volume I and II 2. Respondent Motion Record Volume I and II Date: November 02, 2004 Jette Steward 1 Material Facts Relied On: 1.The Respondent, 3M Canada Company Inc. (hereinafter, "3M Canada") brought an Application pursuant to Section 140 of the Courts of Justice Act, 1990, c. C.43 in Court File No. 33508, requesting that the Court declare the Plaintiff, Ms. Steward (hereinafter, "Ms. Steward") a vexatious litigant. 2.Justice Hockin in his August 16, 2004 Order entered on August 16, 2004 granted the Respondent's request and declared Ms. Steward a vexatious litigant and Order that she seek leave of the court before instituting any further proceeding against 3M Canada. 3. The 3M Canada's only argument for its section 140 Application was that Ms. Steward's various issues had already been dealt with in previous forums and Ms. Steward was seeking to re-litigate the issues in this court. 4. 3M Canada filed with the Court a voluminous amount of documentary evidence from the various forums to support its position. 5.The documentary evidence file by 3M Canada to support its Application shows that none of the allegations against 3M Canada was dealt with in any of the previous forums. In other words, none of the issues raised by Ms. Steward in the various forums were ever dealt with in the previous forums. 6.The Respondent, 3M Canada's documentary evidence shows that the evidence relied on by 3M Canada and the Court did not and does not support the granting of its 2. request made in its Application for an Order declaring Ms. Steward a vexatious litigant pursuant to Section 140 of the CJA and an Order ordering her to seek leave of the court before instituting any further proceeding against 3M Canada. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: GRIEVANCE PROCEEDINGS 7.The Union purport to file grievance No. 2-94 dated March 15, 1994 in respect of Ms. Steward's allegations of harassment and discriminatory treatment by 3M Canada due to her work-related disability. The Union settled the March 15th 1994 grievance as per the March 29, 1995 Agreement without dealing with Ms. Steward's complaints. The March 15th, 1994 grievance was not submitted as evidence in either 3M Canada's Application Record or Motion Record. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 6, p. 107 - Def. Mot.. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 6, p. 110; March 29, 1994 Agreement. 8.The Union also purport to file grievance No. 9-94 dated May 16, 1994. Ms. Steward alleged that 3M Canada violated her seniority rights due to disability. The Union settled the grievance as per the March 29, 1995 Agreement without dealing with Ms. Steward's complaint. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 3, p. 104 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 3, p. 107; Grievance No. 9-94 dated May 16, 1994 9.The Union purport to file termination grievance No. 4-95 dated June 8, 1995. The Union settled the grievance as per the April 17, 1996 Minutes of Settlement without dealing without dealing with the issue of discrimination. Ms. Steward was 3. terminated from her employment on June 6, 1995 due to her disabilities. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 8, p. 111 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 8, p. 114; Grievance No. 4-95 dated Jun. 8, 1995 App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 9, p. 112 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 9, p. 115; Minutes of Settlement dated Apr. 17, 1996 10.The Collective Agreements included in 3M Canada's records show that the agreements contain a Workplace Harassment Policy. The policy was not utilized by the Union on Ms. Steward's behalf. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 1. p. 49-50 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 1, p. 52-53; Col. Agr. Dated Jun. 15, 1992, Wrkpl. Harass. Policy, Memo of Agr. #33, App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 2, p. 94 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 2, p. 97 Col. Agr. dated Jun. 19, 1995 , Wrkpl. Harass. Policy Memo of Agr. #30; CONCLUSION: 11.Ms. Steward's allegations of harassment and discrimination against 3M Canada was never dealt with by the Union. ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD AND ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 1. The Ontario Labour Relations Board (hereinafter, "the OLRB") and the Ontario Human Rights Commission (hereinafter "the OHRC") proceedings ran simultaneously. In the proceeding before the OLRB, Ms. Steward alleged that the National Union of Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of Canada (CAW-Canada) Local 27 ( currently National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union (CAW-Canada) Local 27) (hereinafter "the Union) breached Section 74 4. of the Ontario Labour Relations Act (hereinafter "the LRA") and 3M Canada violated Section 70 (Unfair Labour Practice) of the LRA. 12.In the proceedings before the Commission Ms. Steward filed a human rights complaint naming both 3M Canada and the Union as respondents. Ms. Steward was represented by Counsel in the OLRB proceeding. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD 13. Ms. Steward alleged that the Union violated Section 74 of the LRA (Union's Duty of Fair Respresentation) and also alleged that 3M Canada violated section 70 of the LRA (Unfair Labour Practice.). The Application dated October 15, 1996 reads in part as follows: The Applicant states that the Responding Parties violated sections 70 and 74 of the Labour Relations Act. App. Rec. Vol. I, Tab 10, p.114; - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. I, Tab 10, p. 117; OLRB, Appl. s.70 & 74 App dated Oct. 15, 1996 14. Vice Chair M.A. Nairn (hereinafter "Vice-Chair Nairn) dismissed the Section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. Vice Chair Nairn in her reconsideration decision of October 17. 1997 decision wrote in part as follows: 1.This is an application brought pursuant to section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995. The matter was dismissed as against the employer, 3M Canada Inc. although it chose to remain and participate as an intervenor in the proceeding. The style of cause has been amended accordingly. 2.For reasons given orally at the conclusion of the consultation the matter is hereby dismissed. 5. App. Rec. Vol. I, Tab 13, p. 186; Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. I, Tab 13, p.189; OLRB Recon. dec. dated Oct. 17, 1997 15. Vice-Chair Nairn did not immediately issue a written decision and Ms. Steward was placed in limbo. With the assistance of the Ombudsman Ontario, Ms. Steward was able to obtain a written decision from the Board. Vice-Chair Nairn's October 17, 1997 decision did not provide reasons for the dismissal of the Section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. 16. Instead of providing reasons for her decision to dismiss the Section 70 allegation in her October 17, 1997 decision, Vice-Chair Nairn provided her reasons in her reconsideration decision of August 14, 1998. Vice-Chair Nairn wrote as follows: 1.At the outset of these proceedings the applicant confirmed that it was seeking a remedy pursuant to section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the "Act") as against the National Union of Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of Canada (CAW-Canada) Local 27 (the "Union"). To the extent that the applicant was pursuing a remedy against 3M Canada Inc. (the "employer") it was to have the termination grievance referred to arbitration, which would affect the employer's interest. In the result I dismissed the allegation made pursuant to section 70 of the Act as against the employer. The matter proceeded on the basis of the allegation of a violation of section 74 of the Act. App. Rec. Vol. 1,Tab 14, p. 187-194; Def. Mot. Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 14, p. 190-197; OLRB Aug. 14, 1998 Recon. Decision 17. Vice-Chair Nairn wrongly indicated in her August 14, 1998 reconsideration decision that the October 15, 1996 Application requested that 3M Canada refer Ms. Steward's grievance to arbitration. Unfortunately, because Vice-Chair Nairn did not provide any reasons in her October 17, 1997 decision, but instead provided the reasons for 6. her dismissal in her August 14, 1998 reconsideration decision, Ms. Steward could not challenge Vice-Chair Nairn's reasons for the dismissal of the section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. Basically, when Ms. Steward filed her request for reconsideration she did not know the reasons for the October 17, 1996 decision until the August 14, 1998 reconsideration decision. The remedies requested in the October 15, 1996 Application reads as follows: (b) An Order directing that the Applicant be reinstated by the Respondent Party, 3M Canada Inc. (hereinafter " 3M Canada") in her position as Take Down Operator, effective immediately. (d) In the alternative, an Order directing that the grievance filed by the Responding Party, National Union of Automobile Implement Workers of Canada (CAW-Canada) (hereinafter referred to as "the Union") dated June 8, 1995 be referred to arbitration, and the Union bear the Applicant's cost of independent legal representation at said arbitration. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 10, p. 114; Def. Mot. Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 10, p. 117; OLRB, App. s. 70 &74 Application dated Oct. 15, 1996,. 18. Vice Chair Nairn did not provide reasons for dismissing the section 74 allegation against the Union either. In essence, Vice-Chair Nairn provide a written decision (October 17, 1997), with no reason for her decision to dismiss either the section 70 and 74 allegations. Section 70 and 74 of the LRA reads as follows: Unfair Labour Practice 70.No employer or employers' organization and no person acting on behalf of an employer or an employers organization shall participate in or interfere with the formation, selection or administration of a trade union or the representation by a trade union or contribute financially or other support to a trade union but nothing in this section shall be deemed to deprive an employer of the employer's freedom to express views so long as the employer does not use coercion, intimidation, threats, promises or undue influence. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.2, s.65 7. Trade Union's Duty of Fair Representation 74.A trade union or council of trade unions, so long as it continues to be entitled to represent employees in a bargaining unit shall not act in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith in the representation of any of the employees in the unit, whether or not members of the trade union or any constituent union of the council of trade unions, as the case may be. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.2, s. 69 Ontario Labour Relations Act, 1995, S.O. c. 1, s. 70, 74 19. Had the section 70 allegations against 3M Canada not been dismissed, Ms. Steward could have been restated to her employment as requested in her Application on the grounds that 3M Canada had terminated her employment due to disability. Section 96 (4) of the LRA reads as follows: Enforcement 96 (1) The Board may authorize a labour relations officer to inquire into any complaint alleging a contravention of this Act. (4)Where a labour relations office is unable to effect a settlement of the matter complained of or where the Board in its discretion considers advisable to dispense with an inquiry by a labour relations officer, the Board may inquire into the complaint of a contravention of the this Act and where the Board is satisfied that an employer, employers' organization, trade union, council of trade unions, person or employee has acted contrary to this Act it shall determine what if anything, the employer, employers' organization, trade union, council of trade unions, person or employee shall do or refrain from doing with respect thereto and such determination, without limiting the generality of the foregoing may include, despite the provisions of any collective agreement, any one or more of, (a) an order directing the employer. Employers' organization, trade union, council of trade unions, employee or other person to cease doing the act or acts complained of; 8. (b) an order directing the employer, employers' organization, trade union, council of trade unions, employee or other person to rectify the act or acts complained of; (c ) an order to reinstate in employment or hire the person or employee concerned, with or without compensation, or to compensate instead of hiring or reinstatement of loss earnings or other employment benefits in an that may be assessed by the Board against the employer, employers' organization, trade union, council of trade unions, employee or other person jointly or severally. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.2, s. 91 (1-4). (5)On an inquiry by the Board into a complaint under section (4) that a person has been refused employment, discharged, discriminated against threatened, coerced, intimidated, or otherwise dealt with contrary to this Act lies upon the employer or employers organization. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.2, s. 91(5); 1993 c.27, Sched. Ontario Labour Relations Act, 1995, S.O. c. 1, s. 96 (1)(a)(b)(c), 96 (5) CONCLUSION: 20. What 3M Canada's records show is that the OLRB never heard the section 70 allegations against it. Further because the section 70 allegation was dismissed out right, any allegations against 3M Canada would have been irrelevant since section 74 (Union's Duty of Fair Representation) of the LRA only applies to trade unions. In addition any evidence of discrimination on the part of 3M Canada would have been irrelevant as well because again, section 74 only applies to trade unions. Therefore the request made in her Application pursuant to section 96 (1) (c ) and 96 (5) of the LRA, would have been a non issue. 21. The OLRB never endeavor to determine whether 3M Canada contravened section 70 of the LRA because Vice-Chair Nairn wrongly concluded that Ms. Steward's Application requested as a remedy, that the Respondent, 3M Canada refer her grievance 9. to arbitration. It is my understanding that Vice-Chair Nairn is no longer a Chair at the OLRB and is currently an arbitrator. 22. Furthermore, because the section 70 allegation was dismissed without hearing the allegations against 3M Canada, the dismissal resulted in evidence of collusion between 3M Canada and the Union being ignored. Counsel for Ms. Steward indicated in his Application submissions as follows: 12.3M Canada, in collusion with the Union representatives, adopted the position that if the Applicant were unwilling to make application for Disability Benefits, and continued to insist that her injuries were were work-related, she would be required to return to work in a different position which had already proven unsuitable. 16. Nothing in the Minutes of Settlement prepared by 3M Canada and the Union addressed the likelihood that the Applicant's proposed application for long-term disability benefits would actually be denied or provided a remedy for the Applicant in that eventuality. 23. 3M Canada interfered with the Union's representation of the Applicant by conspiring and colluding with the Union representatives to contrive a settlement acceptable to those parties, but not the Applicant. App. Rec. Vol.I, Tab 10, p. 120; 121;123 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 10, p.123; 124; 126; OLRB Appl. App dated Oct. 15, 1996 23. At the time that Ms. Steward filed for reconsideration of Vice-Chair Nairn's October 17, 1997 decision, she was not represented by Counsel. The allegations against 3M Canada was never dealt with. 10. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 24.Ms. Steward filed a human rights complaint dated October 16, 1996 against both 3M Canada and the Union one day after filing her section 70 and 74 Application with the OLRB. Like her Application filed with the OLRB, Ms. Steward filed one complaint naming both 3M Canada and the Union as Respondents. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 15, p.195; - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol 1, Tab 15, p. 198; OHRC Compl dated Oct. 16, 1996 25.The Commission upon receiving Ms. Steward's October 16th, 1996 complaint assigned filed number SW-2519. . 26.In the the Union's reply to Ms. Steward's complaint, the cover letter dated January 14,1997, addressed to OHRC's Ms. Susan Jostman, Manager, Southwestern Region, the Union's Counsel, Mr. Lewis Gottheil quotes the file number SW-2519, the number assigned to Ms. Steward's complaint. In the top hand corner of the January 14th, 1997 cover letter, the letter and the accompanying response was received January 16, 1997 and the hand written file number SW-2520 assigned to the Union's response upon its receipt by the OHRC. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 17, p. 220 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 17, p. 223; Union cov. letter dated Jan. 14, 1997 27. What the above mention means, is that the Union received Ms. Steward's complaint showing file number SW-2519 naming both 3M Canada and the Union as Respondents in the complaint. 11. 28.At short time thereafter the OHRC notified the Union's Counsel, Mr. Lewis Gotthiel of the new file number and requested that he quote the new file number SW-2520 in his correspondence with the OHRC. Mr. Gottheil, in his February 24, 1998 letter to Ms. Susan Jostman quoted the new file number SW-2520 in his letter addressed to her. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 17, p. 256; - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 17. p. 259; OHRC; Union Counsel letter dated Feb. 24, 1998 29. A month before Vice-Chair Nairn rendered her written decision of October 17, 1997, Christopher White, Counsel for 3M Canada sent a letter dated September 12, 1997 to OHRC Officer, Mr. Lorne Shipmen indicating falsely that Ms. Steward had withdrawn her section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. As already mentioned and confirmed by Vice-Chair Nairn's October 17th 1997 decision and her August 14, 1998 reconsideration decision, Vice-Chair Nairn dismissed the section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. Mr. White quotes file number SW-2519, the file number assigned to Ms. Steward's complaint in his letter. Mr. White's September 12, 1997 letter reads in part as follows: In the spring of this year there was a hearing date at the Ontario Labour Relations Board for the Complainant's Application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act. At that hearing two things relevant to this preliminary objection occurred. First, the Complainant withdrew her application against 3M Canada Company, such that we are only a participant in the Labour Proceeding as an Intervenor. Second, all the parties have agreed to use the Labour Board's "consultation hearing" process which is designed to provide either a settlement or a decision on an expedited basis. To date the parties have been unable to settle the Application and two days, October 16 and 17, 1997 have been scheduled for the continuance (and likely conclusion) of the Labour Board's consultation hearing. 12. App. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 16, p. 209 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 16, p. 212; OHRC, 3M Counsel, C.W. letter dated Sept. 12, 1997 30.At the end of the consultation hearing on April 18, 1997, it was to resume on July 10, 1997. The July 10, 1997 consultation hearing was subsequently adjourned to two consecutive days, October 16th and 17th , 1997. It should be noted that 3M Canada's response (Form A-36) to the Application is dated March 27, 1997. It appears that its response was filed three weeks before the April 18, 1997 consultation hearing and five months after Ms. Steward's October 15, 1996 Application was filed. The OLRB's Rules of Procedure indicates that the Respondents have twenty days from the date they receive the Application to file a response. App. Rec. Vol 1, Tab 11, p. 128-130 - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. 1, Tab 11, p. 131-133; OLRB 3M Form A-36 dated Mar. 27, 1997. 31. Mr. White's false assertion in his letter of September 12, 1997 to OHRC's Susan Jostman that Ms. Steward withdrew her section 70 allegation against 3M Canada was contradicted by Vice-Chair Nairn's October 17, 1997 decision and August 14, 1998 reconsideration decision. 32. Mr. White in his letter dated February 26, 1998 to OHRC's Susan Jostman appeared to have retracted his assertion that Ms. Steward withdrew her section 70 allegation against 3M Canada. Mr. White wrote as follows: Attached please find the Submissions of the Corporate Respondent. These reflect the Submissions previously made but amended given the decision of the Ontario Labour Relations Board last fall dismissing Ms. Steward's Application against both 3M Canada and the C.A.W., Local 27. 13. App. Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 16, p. 216 - Def. Mot. Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 16, p. 219; OHRC , 3M Counsel C.W letter dated Feb. 26, 1998 33. It appears that Mr. White in falsely informing OHRC's Susan Jostman that Ms. Steward withdrew her section 70 allegation against 3M Canada was confident that Ms. Steward's lawyer of the time could be convinced to withdraw the section 70 allegation against 3M Canada before the October consultation hearings. As evidence by Vice-Chair Nairn's decisions, Mr. White was unsuccessful. 34. Ms. Steward filed her human rights complaint on October 16, 1996. However, it took the Commission sixteen months to render a decision on her complaint. The decision(s) is dated April 7, 1998. During the sixteen month period, the Commission only managed to prepare an undated and unsigned Section 34 Case Analysis consisting of two and a quarter pages in length. Since the Commission did not conduct a mediation meeting or investigation there was no reason for its original decision(s) to take sixteen months to render. 35. Both the OLRB and Commission proceedings were being held simultaneously, the and the records show that 3M Counsel, Mr. White was obviously keeping the OHRC abreast of the proceeding at the OLRB. As mentioned, Vice-Chair Nairn did not immediately issue a written decision and Ms. Steward had to request the assistance of the Ombudsman Ontario to obtain a written decision from the OLRB. At the time, the time limit for filing a request for reconsideration was twenty days from the date of the decision (currently fifteen days). 14. 36. Vice-Chair Nairn's reconsideration decision is dated August 14, 1998, indicating a ten month delay in the release of the reconsideration decision. Ms. Steward's delay in filing a request for reconsideration was a result of the delay in the OLRB releasing Vice-Chair Nairn's October 17, 1997 decision. SECTION 34 CASE ANALYSIS 37. As mentioned earlier, the OHRC assigned a new file number SW-2520 to the Union's response. However, the OHRC only prepared on Section 34 Case Analysis. The Section 34 Case Analysis was only prepared for SW-2520, the new file number assigned to the Union. The OHRC did not prepare a Section 34 Case Analysis for file number SW-2519, which names 3M Canada as a Respondent. There is no Section 34 Case Analysis in either 3M Canada's Application Record Motion Record for file number SW-2519. App. Rec., Vol. 11, Tab 18, p. 257 - Def. Mot. Rec., Vol. II, Tab 18, p. 260; OHRC, Sec. 34 Case Analysis (SW-2520) 38. The problem with the new file number assigned to the Union (SW-2520) is that no complaint against the Union existed under the SW-2520 file number. Therefore, the OHRC purport to prepare a Section 34 Case Analysis under file number SW-2520 and a complaint under the said file number didn't exist. In fact this is confirmed by the OHRC in its Reconsideration Report in (undated and unsigned) which the OHRC indicated that it did not separate Ms. Steward's complaint. The OHRC indicated as follows: 15. The facts do not reveal that the complaint was separated. The evidence shows that consistent with the Commission's operating procedure the complaint was identified through a different set of numbers and served separately on the named parties. App. Rec. Vol. II, Tab 22, p 271, - Def. Mot. Rec. Vol. II, Tab 22, p. 274; OHRC Recon. Report. 38. As already mentioned, the Union's Counsel, Mr. Gottheil's letter of January 14, 1997 quotes file number SW-2519, the file number the OHRC assigned to Ms. Steward's complaint naming both 3M Canada and the Union as Respondents. Given Mr. Gottheil' letter of January 14th, 1997 quoting file number assigned to Ms. Steward's complaint (SW-2519) it's evident that the OHRC did not serve the Union a separate complaint indicating file number SW-2520. 39. Given the OHRC confirms in its Reconsideration Report that it did not separate Ms. Steward's complaint, this means that the Commission separated the Union's material from file number SW-2519 by assigning a "different" file number (SW-2520) to the Union's material filed with the OHRC. The OHRC then subsequently relied solely on the file it created exclusively for the Union to arrive at its decision to dismiss Ms. Steward's complaint under Section 34 (1)(a) of the Code. 40. If one were to look into file number SW-2520, one would not find Ms. Steward's October 16, 1996 complaint or any material from Ms. Steward or 3M Canada under the said file number. 41. The Union submitted as a response to Ms. Steward's complaint an identical copy of its response to Ms. Steward's Application before the OLRB. The OHRC as indicated 16. in its Section 34 Case Analysis relied on the information contained under the new file number assigned to the Union, SW-2520, which only contained the Union's response (Union's response to Application filed with OLRB ) and correspondences. App., Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 12, p. 167-185, OLRB, Union reply Def., Mot., Rec., Vol. 1, Tab 12, p. 170 -188, OLRB, Union reply App., Rec., Vol 1, Tab 17, p. 222-241, OHRC, Union reply Def., Mot., Rec., Vol.1, Tab 17, p. 225-244, OHRC, Union reply 42. The Commission rendered two April 7th , 1998 decisions. The cause of style in the decision under file number SW-2519, names 3M Canada only as a Respondent. But the complaint under the aforesaid file number names both 3M Canada and the Union a Respondents. 43. The other April 7th, 1998 decision, the cause of style names the Union only as a Respondent. The file number quoted is SW-2520. As mentioned was no complaint under this file number since the Commission did not separate Ms. Steward's complaint of October 16, 1996. 44.Where as the OHRC rendered two April 7th 1998 decisions for each file number, it only rendered one reconsideration decision dated June 13, 1998. The style of cause names 3M Canada as the only respondent and quotes file number SW-2519, the file number the OHRC assigned to Ms. Steward's complaint that named both 3M Canada and the Union as a respondent. App. Rec. Vol. II, Tab 22, p. 274 - D |
| Name: | Pro Se Canada |
| E-mail address: | prosecanada@webspawner.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.webspawner.com/users/prosecanada/index.html |
| Area of Interest: | Fundamental Rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Sorry I put the link in the wrong box below. Please feel free to visit my web page. My rant on the inequalities of the justice system are below. |
| Name: | Equal Under the Law |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Dear Ann, I think if your comments were as "polite" as you say you might have also posted them with my comments. You attacked the person who had signed my guestbook and then tried to deface my guestbook by reams and reams of scrolling to make the poster's comments unavailable. Needless to say this miffed me. To be fair to you I deleted both your and my post.You are most welcome to post constructive comments at my site. You are also welcome to avail yourself of my, as well as other members, assistance in any pro se matter you may undertake. You are not welcome to attack other members of my site nor to deface my guestbook.
Again, I posted my web page here for a very good purpose and now, out of some immature angst you are trying to dissuade people from visiting my web page. What possible positive thing can be accomplished by that? I think the issue of Equal Justice is far more important than whatever conflict you have with my member. As well, this board addresses far more important issues than you not liking my comments back to you. If you feel the need to respond, please go back to my site and email me. There is a link there. As for the rest of this web board members. Please do not be deterred from visiting my site. I am a nice person when you don't make efforts to deface my board or attack other members. |
| Name: | Steve Hands |
| E-mail address: | shands@consultronics.com |
| Area of Interest: | Police Abuse |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Yesterday ( Sept 15th, 2004 ) my girlfriend ( 32 yrs old ) was arrested for assault against a former employee - the Arresting officer felt due to the size and muscular build of my girlfriend that she must have committed this crime. This is not what is most upsetting - she then asked my girlfriend to answer some questions - when my girlfriend responded that nothing had occurred between her and the plaintiff the Arresting officer threw handcuffs on her saying that she was unwilling to cooperate - she then threw her up against a wall in a holding cell ( which dislocated her shoulder ) she also refused to let her make any phone calls or use the washroom for 3 hrs. This kind of conduct is disturbing to imagine. It's upsetting to think our tax dollars pays to have this kind of misbehavior in our Law system. |
| Name: | Kevin McEwan |
| Area of Interest: | Human Rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | The Ontario Human Rights Commission announced recently that it is reducimg the number of its Intake Staff (from 7 to 4).
Whether Commission staff and budget are reduced or increased, the record of this abominable, corrupt organization has taught us that there is no difference whatsoever. More or less staff or money has nothing to do with integrity, transparency, honesty and credibility that the commission lacks. K.M. |
| Name: | Pro-Police |
| Area of Interest: | Pro-Police |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | No |
| Comments: | some evidence to back your one line claims would be a good start. |
| Name: | Nickel |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.knowshairs.com |
| Area of Interest: | evanston IL Police |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | The problem of police violating basic human rights is also rampant in the US. Please visit my site for the latest shocking example of policed violence and cover-up. |
| Name: | Annie Boucher |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Craig Bromell has to be the most ignorant SOB alive in this country. I don't know if anyone has seen the article in the Star about his news program and his ridiculous rant on the shooting yesterday in downtown Toronto. The guy has a PhD in being an offensive fool. I can not believe that they would put him on radio. He is Howard Stern without the media savvy. Here is an excerpt...
from the Star: This "Shooting Was NOT Racial Profiling" rant gave Bromell and his co-pilot, former Mojo newsreader Ross MacLeod, a chance to assure us that Brookes was "an absolute scumbag" and "a complete idiot" who "had some significant issues" and deserved what he got fair and square, whatever colour he may have been. We heard this all again on the half-hour, when the Mojo news department repeatedly led off with clips from the show: "No Profiling In Police Shooting, Bromell Says." Is there an echo in here? Bromell admitted no one had as yet said the police were racist in shooting Brookes — but be informed, Mojo listeners, "we predict" it's only a matter of time before "some real morons will be bleeding and complaining" about the racial slant in the takedown. I can not help but marvel at the notion that someone this stupid actually gets paid for his ignorant and irrelevant commentary. I guess, like the new era of "trash television" with it's Maury's and Springers and Reality TV shows we are truly in the era of "trash radio". I guess this radio station can not afford the air rights to Howard Stern or something. Imagine that, after being given his walking papers by the Union Craig Bromell is now "the poor person's Howard Stern". I might laugh if it were not so pathetic. Someone needs to keep a close ear to him though as if the government can shut down CHOI FM in Quebec, it won't be long before Bromell and his blustering stupidity puts MOJO in that position. |
| Name: | Linda Mc Donald |
| E-mail address: | eliselinda@aol.com |
| Area of Interest: | Police harrassment |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | While crossing from Alaska / Canada / to Washington. At the border, my friend was harrassed by the Border patrol. They kept him there for 2 days. Before it was over an officer hit my friend from behind. My friend turned and defended himself. Long story short. Officer hospitalized, friend in jail for being harrassed by this officer. Please if there is a witness please come forward. Need advice.
The sad part is that this could ruin my friends life. With a clean past to face this, is unheard of. Lost. Thanks Linda |
| Name: | Cherish Bruyere |
| E-mail address: | cherish_shandra@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | harassment |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | My family and I are constantly being harrassed by the police and the people in our neighborhood because we have horses. They are ebing taken care of proplerly and I do not see the problem. They get out of their fence sometimes and are on the neighbors lawn for maybe a toatal of 2 or 3 seconds....now why is it that we get threatened to have our horses taken away or us charged/thrown in jail if we do not get rid of them but yet they never get in trouble for harrassing us or letting their dog eat our garbage crap in our yard and bite at my horses? I need help and so does my family. It is tearing us to pieces. Please llet me know someone who I can talk to to get them to stop. Thanks |
| Name: | Ms. Daria Ilene Annglow Mercer, B.A. |
| E-mail address: | Doll@Sympatico.ca |
| Area of Interest: | Policing Issues |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Thank You and pls add my name to such a great and worthy purpose. Peace Always,
Ms. D.I.A.M |
| Name: | Mr. White |
| E-mail address: | seempatico4u@aol.com |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: |
I am sorry that I have written CANADA LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT ! I recognize that Canada is a multicultural society and I recognize that people have their right to express themselves freely. I snapped because I do not like my boss who is not born in Canada. He is way smarter, much more educated and more charming than me. He is a hard worker, does not drink and does not dope, which I do. One day he caught me doped on the job and he suspended me for one month without pay. That is why I do not like immigrants. |
| Name: | Mr. White |
| E-mail address: | seempatico4u@aol.com |
| Area of Interest: | Reality |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Very simple solution for many :
Canada.....LOVE IT.....or.....LEAVE IT ! |
| Name: | Robin Hodgson |
| E-mail address: | robinhodgson@canada.com karma_mechanic_2112@yahoo.ca |
| Area of Interest: | my wifes and mine human rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | My wife who I married in Canada from the UK, we both wanted to start a life together how ever a Provical canadian goverment body interfeared with federal canadian goverment body, and it has destroyed our marrage |
| Name: | michael luck |
| Area of Interest: | police, medical, political imcompetence |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Canada is sickeningly judgemental. It lives in the dark ages. Not only that, it never ever stops compensating for itself. "How great we are..." "How cute we are for a little country..." "How kind we are..." What a good example we are to others.."
THIS IS NOT TRUE! There is so much incompetence here. Police losing control, and beating up people. Doctors taking short cuts and killing people. Politicians rewarding themselves for "being Canadian," and stealing taxpayers' money. The only thing Canada is good at is cover up. This country should be called "FEBREZE..." That awful substance that is advertized on TV to cover up the stench of your dog sleeping on your beautiful feather duvet. |
| Name: | Claude Beland |
| Area of Interest: | Human Rights |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: |
Well said Annie Boucher. It appears that hypocrisy is the one thing that separates Canada from the rest of the world. Iran never claimed "championning" human rights around the globe. But our naked emporer did. Does Shidane Arone? Somalia Inquiry? ring a bell, Canadian government, champion of Human rights ? http://www.canoe.ca/JamBooksReviewsS/somalia_desbarats.html |
| Name: | Milan Novak |
| E-mail address: | mcyberspace@fastmail.fm |
| Homepage URL: | http://www3.sympatico.ca/milan.novak/all/study_intro.html |
| Area of Interest: | Police Corruption |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | Study: Ontario Law Enforcement & Justice
This study of 1996-2002 public sector salary disclosures suggests answers to the wide-spread allegations of police and judicial corruption currently plaguing Ontario. It shows the provincial Tories engaged in a strategic buy up of political support throughout the justice system and also gives a glimpse of the reasons why Ontario ended up with $6 billion hidden deficit after 8-year of Harris/Eves government. http://www3.sympatico.ca/milan.novak/all/study_intro.html |
| Name: | JIm |
| E-mail address: | reelrazor@hotmail.com |
| Area of Interest: | rcmp misconduct |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | I am trying to find out more about circumstances I heard in a song at a festival. It was about cops taking people(young adults) out of town in winter and letting/making them freeze to death. Can anyone give me details, or even the song title? |
| Name: | Annie B Boucher |
| Area of Interest: | Police Abuse |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | What hypocrites the government of Canada is! I should think that they would look after the human rights violations in their own back year before they go criticizing another country. They are prepared to set sanctions against Iran for one injustice, against one woman.No one lecture me, I understand the 'freedom of press implications' but at the end of the day it is one woman killed by a justice system. Gee, wonder why the likes of Robin Voce, Fionna Stewart and Pierre Lizotte didn't get the government's attention. It took over 9 years to get someone to look into Dudley George's killing. There are many, many more which would make me too sick to mention. Pefectly innocent people killed by the police and our "just us" system but the Federal Government could care less.
Anyone remember the Amnesty International report on the US justice system in regard to Human Rights violations? "...and the weak shall be preyed upon by those to whom they had looked to for protection...and worse yet they will not be believed..as their abusers will hide behind their nation's reputation as being at the forefront of Human Rights"..that about sums up Canada..the big lying, hypocrite it is! Damn hypocrites!! They make me so angry! I don't see anyone being criminally charged for assaulting that poor Somalian guy and then terrorizing him with criminal charges for something he did not do....do you? In fact I can not think of a single murdering or human rights abusing cop or official that has been convicted in the last twenty years...can you? Damn hypocrites!!! |
| Name: | Annie Boucher |
| Area of Interest: | Police Abuse |
| Did You Appreciate Using This Page: | Yes |
| Comments: | There appears to still be ultra right remnants in Toronto's city counsil. They are making no |