Welcome to my nifty Dreambook, a free guestbook service from New Dream Network and the DreamHost!If you have a minute, please add your entry to those below by signing my Dreambook!
| Name: | onecitizenspeaking |
| E-mail address: | steve@onecitizenspeaking.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://onecitizenspeaking.com |
| Comments: | Did John Ziegler just officially out Ken Chiampou as being GAY? http://www.onecitizenspeaking.com/2008/01/is-former-talk.html. |
| Name: | D. Perkins, Jr |
| E-mail address: | pearlave@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | I've been a John and Ken fan since the mid 1990's and I had the chance to meet them in person last fall. They are my heroes, after my dad because they don't kowtow to any political party (like Rush) and they call them as they see it. These spineless politicians better get their stuff together because listeners of the John and Ken show number in the thousands. I live in Atlanta now but I still listen to the previous day podcast. Take care and stay blessed. |
| Name: | Proud White American |
| E-mail address: | at yahoo.com no spam |
| Comments: | The Mexicans in OUR country, should read THEIR history books and honor
the treaty between the U.S and Mexico!! http://www.pbs.org/kera/usmexicanwar/war/wars_end_guadalupe.html War's End Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo by Richard Griswold del Castillo The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the U.S.-Mexican War. Signed on 2 February 1848, it is the oldest treaty still in force between the United States and Mexico. As a result of the treaty, the United States acquired more than 500,000 square miles of valuable territory and emerged as a world power in the late nineteenth century. Beyond territorial gains and losses, the treaty has been important in shaping the international and domestic histories of both Mexico and the United States. During the U.S.-Mexican War, U.S. leaders assumed an attitude of moral superiority in their negotiations of the treaty. They viewed the forcible incorporation of almost one-half of Mexico's national territory as an event foreordained by providence, fulfilling Manifest Destiny to spread the benefits of U.S. democracy to the lesser peoples of the continent. Because of its military victory the United States virtually dictated the terms of settlement. The treaty established a pattern of political and military inequality between the two countries, and this lopsided relationship has stalked Mexican-U.S. relations ever since. The treaty in draft form was brought to Mexico by Nicholas P. Trist, the U.S. peace commissioner, in the summer of 1847. In its basic form it called for the cession of Alta and Baja California and New Mexico, the right of transit across the Tehuantepec isthmus, and the Rio Grande as the southern border of Texas. In exchange the United States would pay up to $20 million to Mexico and assume up to $3 million in U.S. citizens' claims against Mexico. In subsequent negotiations the demand for Baja California and the right of transit were dropped. After the military campaign, which had resulted in U.S. occupation of most of Mexico's major cities, the Mexican government agreed to meet with Trist to discuss peace terms. Just before negotiations were to begin, however, Trist received instructions from President James K. Polk ordering him to return to Washington, D.C. Trist, however, decided to stay on and meet with the Mexican representatives, even though he lacked official status. Negotiations began in earnest in January 1848. The Mexican government, headed by the ad interim Mexican president Manuel de la Pena y Pena, quickly agreed to the boundary issues: Texas's southern boundary would be the Rio Grande, the cession of Alta California would include the port of San Diego, and Mexico would give up its territory between Texas and California, with a boundary to be surveyed. Mexican peace commissioners Luis G. Cuevas, Bernardo Couto, and Miguel Atristain spent a good deal of time on various drafts of Articles VIII and IX, which dealt with the issues of property rights and U.S. citizenship for Mexican citizens in the newly ceded regions. The Mexican commissioners succeeded in amplifying the texts of the two articles. They also introduced Article XI, which gave the United States responsibility for controlling hostile Indian incursions originating on the U.S. side of the border. (Article XI proved to be a source of irritation between the two nations and was subsequently negated by the Gadsden Treaty of 1854.) On his own initiative, Trist offered an indemnity of $15 million, judging that this would gain acceptance for the treaty among those who felt that the United States had already paid enough in "blood and treasure." After reaching agreement on all these issues, Trist drew up an English-language draft of the treaty and Cuevas translated it into Spanish, preserving the idiom and thought rather than the literal meaning. Finally, on 2 February 1 1848, the Mexican representatives met Trist in the Villa of Guadalupe Hidalgo, across from the shrine of the patron saint of Mexico. They signed the treaty and then celebrated a mass together at the basilica. Signing the treaty was only the beginning of the process; it still had to be ratified by the congresses of both the United States and Mexico. No one could foresee how the Polk administration would receive a treaty negotiated by an unofficial agent; nor could they know the twists and turns of the Mexican political scene for the next few months. In both the U.S. and Mexican governments there was opposition to the treaty. In the United States, the northern abolitionists opposed the annexation of Mexican territory. In the Mexican congress, a sizable minority was in favor of continuing the fight. Nevertheless both countries ratified the document. The signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo marked the end of a war and the beginning of a lengthy U.S. political debate over slavery in the acquired territories, as well as continued conflict with Mexico over boundaries. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo looms larger in the history of Mexico than in that of the United States. Partly because of the loss of valuable territory, the treaty ensured that Mexico would remain an underdeveloped country well into the twentieth century. Mexican historians and politicians view this treaty as a bitter lesson in U.S. aggression. As a result of the humiliation of the war and the loss of more than half of the national territory, young Mexicans embraced a reform movement, headed by Benito Juarez, governor of Oaxaca, who had opposed the treaty. In the 1850s the reformers came to power in Mexico vowing to strengthen the country's political system so that never again would they be victims of U.S. aggression. Benito Juarez's La Reforma was the start of a political and economic modernization process that continues to this day in Mexico. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo has had implications not only for relations between the two countries but also for international law. Interpretations of the provisions of the treaty have been important in disputes over international boundaries, water and mineral rights, and the civil and property rights of the descendants of the Mexicans in the ceded territories. Since 1848 there have been hundreds of court cases citing the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo as a basis for land claims, but few Mexican claimants were successful in retaining their land. Since 1848 Native Americans and Mexican Americans have struggled to achieve political and social equality within the United States, often citing the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo as a document that promised civil and property rights. Although the treaty promised U.S. citizenship to former Mexican citizens, the Native Americans in the ceded territories, who in fact were Mexican citizens, were not given full U.S. citizenship until the 1930s. Former Mexican citizens were almost universally considered foreigners by the U.S. settlers who moved into the new territories. In the first half century after ratification of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, hundreds of state, territorial, and federal legal bodies produced a complex tapestry of conflicting opinions and decisions bearing on the meaning of the treaty. The property rights seemingly guaranteed in Articles VIII and IX of the treaty (and in the Protocol of Queretaro) were not all they seemed. In. U.S. courts, the property rights of former Mexican citizens in California, New Mexico, and Texas proved to be fragile. Within a generation the Mexican-Americans became a disenfranchised, poverty-stricken minority. |
| Name: | Proud White American |
| E-mail address: | same |
| Comments: | Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed Pharmacist." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue. Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table...everywhere. Then some of the birds turned mean: They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket. And others birds were boisterous and loud: They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food. After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch anymore. I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio. Soon, the back yard was like it used to be...quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal. Now lets see...our government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, free education and allows anyone born here to be a automatic citizen. Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands. Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families: you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor: your child's 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English: Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to press "one" to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than "Old Glory" are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties. Maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder. |
| Name: | Proud White American |
| E-mail address: | its at yahoo no spam |
| Comments: | Proud To Be White
Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this? There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, Native Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You Call me "White boy," "Cracker," "Honkey," " Whitey," "Caveman" . And that's OK. But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook or Chink... You call me a racist. You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You Have Yom Hashoah You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi You have the NAACP. You have BET. If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) .. We'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day .. You would call us racists. If we had White History Month We'd be racists. If we had any organization for only whites to "advance" OUR lives .. We'd be racists. We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that? If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships ... You know we'd be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US , yet if there were "White colleges" .. THAT would be a racist college. In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching For your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, You would call us racists. You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're Not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride .. You call us racists You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer Shoots a black gang member or beats up a Black drug-dealer running From the law and posing a threat to society .. You call him a racist. I am proud. But, you call me a racist. Why is it that only whites can be racists? |
| Name: | billie |
| E-mail address: | billie061@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | The ignorance and racist comments here are appalling, It would serve you better to put as much effort into finding a way to bring your solders home from Iraq and end the misery over there. Im sure the majority of you have ancestors who were the immigrants who built your country particularly with surnames like McCay comes from Scotland and Ireland. Have many family members and friends of all colur and nationality in your country thank God for decent people |
| Name: | Sparrow |
| Comments: | Please dont fall into the trap that has been set for us!Divide and conquer is the real goal in this debate.Modern day slavery is their goal,and they dont care what color we are,just that we fight each other and not see them screwing us behind the scenes.The real enemies are the Giant corporations and they have no allegiance to any country and their Flag has nothing but $$$$$ signs on it.The W.T.O and the MONEY CHANGERS will make us all slaves soon.Maybe thats why Christ threw them out of the Temple. |
| Name: | Twister |
| E-mail address: | Twister@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.geocities.com/games241poker/texas-holdem-poker-chip-set.htm |
| Comments: | Long searched set strip holdem download poker poker chip mikes texas |
| Name: | Mike |
| Comments: | In regards to the illegal immigration amnesty... we should ask ourselves what would Jesus do? Would Jesus redicule and these people from leaving their corrupt countries to work hard in America? I think Not. The people who set up wehirealiens.com should have much better things to do than seach "alleged" employers and expose them like that. That's bs. People like them make America look bad. |
| Name: | Brian Mccay |
| E-mail address: | BMccay@aol.com |
| Comments: | I hate mexicans/blacks and all illegal aliens living in America. After reading this website along with wehirealiens.com I am glad there are more us who agree and are full of prejudices just like myself. America is not a melting pot and we are not all immigrants.. the mexicans from Mexico are! Once i retire and have nothing better to do i will join the other loser minutemen so i can shoot,report, and condemn illegal aliens. Long live the white man!! Yee Haw!! |
| Name: | D. Perkins Jr |
| E-mail address: | pearlave@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | I've been a faithful John and Ken listener since I got out of the military over ten years ago. They are the only ones that are telling it like it is and exposing the hypocrisy and lies that our govt has done in their unwillingness to rid our country of the ills because of b.s. politcally correctness. |
| Name: | Donna Reid |
| E-mail address: | w_d_reid@bellsouth.net |
| Comments: | I read this on congress.org, I think you will find it very interesting how the govenment is screwing us badly!!
IMPORTANT! Senator Jeff Sessions Speech on Immigration Bill! This speech says it all and all concerned, Democrats and Republicans alike should read this. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R.-Ala.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, offered a devastating analysis on the Senate immigration bill in a speech delivered on the Senate floor on Tuesday, May 23. Sessions pointed to shocking elements of the bill that were hidden deep in its text. These include, for example, that the employers of illegal aliens would be given an amnesty for cheating on their taxes, and that under the terms of the law the government would for all practical purposes have to take an illegal alien’s word for it that he has been in the country illegally long enough to qualify for an amnesty. Sessions also pointed to some of the tremendous hidden costs of the bill, including the $500 billion in additional welfare payments it will cost American taxpayers in the period 10 to 20 years after its passage. Senators who vote for the bill today cannot credibly claim later they were unaware of the elements and consequences that Sen. Session’s outlined in this speech. BEGIN SPEECH: ""I am going to take some time tonight to inform my colleagues about some of the problems with the legislation before us. It is worse than you think, colleagues. The legislation has an incredible number of problems with it. Some, as I will point out tonight, can only be considered deliberate. Whereas on the one hand it has nice words with good sounding phrases in it to do good things, on the second hand it completely eviscerates that, oftentimes in a way that only the most careful reading by a good lawyer would discover. So I feel like I have to fulfill my duty. I was on the Judiciary Committee. We went into this. We tried to monitor it and study it and actually read this 614-page bill, and I have a responsibility and I am going to fulfill my responsibility. I think the things I am saying tonight ought to disturb people. They ought to be unhappy about it. It ought to make them consider whether they want to vote for this piece of legislation that, in my opinion, should never, ever become law. I would also just point out I will be offering tomorrow, or soon, an amendment to deal with the earned-income tax credit situation that is raised by this legislation, focusing on the amnesty in the bill and what will happen after amnesty is granted, before they become a full citizen. The Congressional Budget Office has concluded that the earned-income tax credit will pay out to those who came into our country illegally $29 billion over 10 years. The earned-income tax credit has been on the books for some time. It is a good bit larger than most people think. The average recipient of it receives $1,700. Lower-income people get a larger amount. Over half the people who we expect will receive amnesty are without a high school degree. They are receiving lower wages. They will be the ones who will particularly qualify for this. This is a score that has been given to us by the group that is supposed to score it—$29 billion will be paid out. If they go all the way and become a citizen they will be entitled to this like any other citizen, and they will be entitled to get it under my amendment. But I do not believe we should award people who have entered our country illegally, submitted a false Social Security number, worked illegally—I do not believe we should reward them with $29 billion of the taxpayers’ money. That is a lot of money. I will also be offering a budget point of order, I or one of my colleagues will, in the next day or so. We have been working on that. We asked for a report. The Congressional Budget Office has concluded that the budget point of order lies in the first 10 years of this bill. It also concludes that it lies under the long-term provisions of the budget points of order for expenditures in the outyears. They didn’t give us those numbers, but they said, without much work—they didn’t have to do much work—the numbers are going to be much worse in the outyears. It clearly would be a detriment to the Government and these figures would exceed the budget, and a budget point of order would lie. At the Heritage Foundation, Mr. Robert Rector, who is the expert who dealt with welfare, studied this. He was the architect of welfare reform who has done so much to improve America’s welfare system and improve incomes for low-income families. It really worked beautifully. He was the architect of it. He says this bill represents the greatest increase in welfare in 35 years. With the provisions and benefits that will be in it, he estimates that year 10 through year 20, the cost could be $50 to $60 billion a year to the taxpayers because it takes some time for the people who are adjusting and becoming citizens and/or legal permanent residents to really begin to make the claims. CBO admits the numbers are going to surge in the outyears. He says it is $50 billion a year. If that is so—and he is not exaggerating the numbers, because that is based solely on the amnesty provisions, not the provisions that will allow 3 times to 4 times as many people to come into the country legally in the next 20 years as come in today, and many of them will go on welfare because that whole system is not based on identifying people with skills and educational levels that would indicate they would be more than low-wage workers—so it could really be more than that. But $50 billion a year over 10 years is $500 billion. That is a half a trillion dollars, and that is why Mr. Rector said this legislation is a fiscal catastrophe. This is a man whose opinions and ideas and research this Congress, and particularly the Republicans, utilized to hammer away, time and time again, year after year, to get welfare reform. It finally happened. It worked just like he said. The predictions of disaster made against his recommendations proved to be false. He is saying that about this. So this is not a technical point of order. It represents an attempt to save the fiscal soundness of the budget of the United States. I want to take some moments here to deal with some problems with the legislation. The American people are suspicious of us. They were promised in 1986, after years of urging the Government, the President and the Congress, promised to fix our borders and end illegal immigration. In exchange for that they acquiesced and went along with amnesty in 1986. They said there were a million, 2 million here who would claim it. It turned out 3 million claimed amnesty after 1986. That ought to give us some pause about the projections that we would have. We have 11 million people here now and only 8 or so will seek amnesty under it. That ought to give us some pause there. It may well be above the number. So the American people are suspicious and they are dubious and they are watching us carefully, and they should. Let me tell you some of the things that are in the legislation that indicate a lack of respect for the American people, really. Some of these are some of the reasons I said the other day the Senate should be ashamed of itself, the way we are moving this bill. My staff, working up some of these comments, came up with a title—maybe at my suggestion—“Sneaky Lawyer Tricks” that are in the bill. I will let you decide if that is a fair description of what is in it. I will go down through some of the matters that are important. There are others I could complain about for which we will not have time. First, the legislation talks about title IV of the bill. That title IV of the [*S5031] bill defines the new H2-C program as a temporary guest worker program. Those are in big print in the bill: Temporary guest workers. That sounds like a temporary worker, doesn’t it? It sounds like a guest, like somebody who stays in your bedroom for a weekend, a guest, temporary guest. Interesting, section 408 sets out the temporary guest worker visa program task force. So a little further down it has what is called a temporary guest worker visa program task force. So you would think they are writing in this section, would you not, something about the task force. But this, down in that section, this task force establishes the number of H2C visas that may be issued annually and subsection (h) is where the writers of the bill hid the provision that actually transforms these so-called temporary workers into legal, permanent residents. OK? So all the big print, “temporary guest workers,” “temporary guest worker task force,” and then you read in that section down there that it effectively converts them from temporary workers to legal permanent residents, granting them a green card. It is tucked away in a title that has nothing to do with substance of that matter. So I am pleased that my staff and others who have been reading the bill have discovered that. It wasn’t discovered early on in the process. Family members of H-2C visa holder need not be healthy. Under current law, aliens must prove that they are admissible and meet certain health standards. Many times, visa applicants must have a medical exam to show that they do not have a communicable disease. They have to be up-to-date on immunizations, and cannot have mental disorders. Spouses and children of H-2C visa holders, however, are not required to have a medical exam before receiving a visa. I have an amendment to fix this that I hope is accepted. The work requirement for a blue card can be satisfied in a matter of hours. Under the AgJOBS component of the substitute, illegal alien agricultural workers who have worked 150 “workdays” in agriculture over the last 2 years will receive a “blue card,” allowing them to live and work permanently in the U.S. However, because current law defines an agricultural “workday” as 1 hour of work per day—the bill language restates that definition on page 397—an alien who has worked for as little as 150 hours—there are 168 hours in a week—in agriculture over the last 2 years will qualify for a blue card. Blue card aliens can only be fired for just cause, unlike an American citizen worker who is likely under an employment at will agreement with the agricultural employer. No alien granted blue card status may be terminated from employment by any employer during the period of blue card status except for just cause. Because blue card aliens are not limited to working in agriculture, this employment requirement will follow the alien at their second and third jobs as well. The bill goes as far as setting up an arbitration process for blue card aliens who allege they have been terminated without just cause. Furthermore, the bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to pay the fee and expenses of the arbitrator. American citizens do not have a right to this arbitration process, why are we setting up an arbitration process for blue card aliens paid for by the American taxpayer. Regarding free legal counsel, the AgJOBS amendment goes further than paying for arbitrators, it also provides free legal counsel to illegal aliens who want to receive this amnesty. The AgJOBS amendment specifically states that recipients of “funds under the Legal Services Corporation Act” shall not be prevented “from providing legal assistance directly related to an application for adjustment of status under this section.” Interestingly, page 414 of the bill requires the alien to have an attorney file the application for him. Not only will AgJOBS give amnesty to 1.5 million illegal aliens, it would have the American taxpayer pay the legal bills of those illegal aliens. This is unbelievable and unacceptable. We should not be rewarding illegal aliens who break our laws with free legal counsel and a direct path to citizenship. Under this bill a temporary worker is eligible for a green card if they, in part, maintained their H-2C status. In order to maintain this status the “temporary” worker may not be unemployed for a period of 60 continuous days. This means that a temporary worker only has to work 1 day in every 59 days to maintain status. This employment requirement only requires that they work about 1 day every 2 months. In this bill, an alien who has been here between 2 and 5 years is not eligible for asylum if they have persecuted others on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. However, an alien here more than 5 years who has persecuted others on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion gets amnesty under this bill. There is no specific ineligibility for such conduct. Since it is included under the “mandatory deferred departure” section, a court will interpret this to mean we purposefully left it out of the “earned amnesty.” I cannot imagine why the drafters of this bill would allow persecutors to benefit from amnesty. The bill’s future flow “guest worker” program in title IV leaves no illegal alien behind—it is not limited to people outside the United States who want to come here to work in the future, but includes illegal aliens currently present in the United States that do not qualify for the amnesty programs in title VI, including aliens here for less than 2 years. Under the bill language, you can qualify for the new H-2C program to work as a low-skilled permanent immigrant, even if you are unlawfully present inside the United States today. The bill specifically says: In determining the alien’s admissibility as an H-2C nonimmigrant . . . paragraphs (5), (6)(A), (7), (9)(B), and (9) (C) of section 212(a) may be waived for conduct that occurred before the effective date. . . . By waving these grounds of inadmissibility, the new H-2C program is specifically intended to apply to illegal aliens who were already removed from the United States and illegally reentered. The bill tells DHS to accept “just and reasonable inferences” from day labor centers and the alien’s “sworn declaration” as evidence that the alien has met the amnesty’s work requirement. Under the bill, the alien meets the “burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the alien has satisfied the [work] requirements” if the alien can demonstrate employment “as a matter of just and reasonable inference.” An alien can present “conclusive evidence” of employment in the United States by presenting documents from social security, IRS, employer, or a “union or day labor center.” The bill then states that: It is the intent of Congress that the [work] requirement . . . be interpreted and implemented in a manner that recognizes and takes into account the difficulties encountered by aliens in obtaining evidence of employment due to the undocumented status of the alien. If these lax standards can’t be met, the bill makes sure that the alien can get what they need by allowing them to submit “sworn declarations for each period of employment.” Putting these together the alien must prove it is more likely than not that there is a just and reasonable inference that the alien was employed. I don’t know what this means other than DHS will have to accept just about anything as proof of employment. Regarding in-State tuition for illegal aliens, current law provides that: [A]n alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident. The DREAM Act would eliminate this provision and allow illegal alien college and university students to be eligible for in-state tuition without affording out-of-state citizen students the same opportunity. Thus, the University of Alabama could offer in-state tuition to illegal alien students while requiring citizens residing in Mississippi to pay the much higher out-of-state tuition rates. Allowing all illegal aliens enrolled in college to receive in-state tuition rates means that while American citizens from 49 other states have to pay out-of-state tuition rates to send their kids to [*S5032] UVA, people who have illegally immigrated to this country might not. Out-of-state tuition rates range from 2 to 3 ½ times the in-state resident tuition rate. Regarding Federal financial aid for illegal aliens, while the Pell grants provision was removed from the bill, Stafford student loans and work study remains in. Under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, legal permanent residents and certain other eligible non-citizens are eligible to compete with American citizens for certain types of higher education assistance. The DREAM Act makes illegal aliens eligible for several types of higher education assistance offered under the Higher Education Act—including Stafford student loans and work study programs. There is another matter, another sleight of hand I suggest. Amnesty both for legal aliens who have been here for more than 5 years, and those in the next category who are here from 2 to 5 years, don’t really require that those aliens have to be continuously present in the United States. That is what it says in plain language. It starts off that you have to be continuously present in the United States. But, once again, is that what it really means? The bill allows these aliens to depart and to return after a brief departure. This allows illegal aliens who broke our laws by entering the United States and who have left and returned illegally perhaps multiple times—and each time violating our laws by entering the United States—to qualify for this amnesty. I am not sure how these departures and illegal entries can be considered innocent since the illegal aliens broke U.S. laws by reentering. But it will absolve them from any of these multiple violations. That is a huge loophole. This is even more important. An alien may not have had deep roots in our country. They may have spent a lot of their time away from our country. But they heard about this amnesty, and if they can get in the country, then they will say they have been here continuously, perhaps. Somebody says: No. We found out you were back home. He says: That was brief. I want my amnesty. We object. I am going to take you to court, or you prove it, or I say I have been here. That is what I say. It is going to be very difficult to prove that. There are provisions in the bill that deal with U.S. worker protections. The bill purports to protect U.S. workers from the flood of cheap labor that might occur by requiring employers to prove to the Department of Labor that good-faith efforts have been taken, first, to recruit U.S. workers for a job before they go out and hire someone from outside of our country. They ought to at least find out if there are American workers who want the job. Then they are supposed to notify the Secretary of Labor and the Department of Homeland Security when one of these H-2C workers is “separated from employment.” I am quoting that—“separated from employment” requires notice. We heard defenders of the bill say: Well, if you are not continuously working, they will notify the Department of Labor and you have to leave the country. Have you heard that? You have to be continuously working, you can’t be not working, or else you are not entitled to the benefits of this H-2C provision. The separation from employment notification is supposed to help the Department of Labor and Homeland Security know which people have been out of work, and if they are out of work under the bill for more than 60 days, their visas are supposed to be revoked. OK. That is supposed to be a provision that makes sure people who come here are really working. Sounds good. But under the provisions of the bill, the term “separation from employment”—you can find that on page 236. As defined, the term means virtually zero. As defined, “separation from employment is anything other than discharged for inadequate performance, violation of workplace rules, cause, voluntary departure, voluntary retirement, or expiration of a grant or contract.” Furthermore, it does not include those situations where the worker is offered—even if they do not take it—another position by the same employer. Is that what I just read to you? It is hard to believe—that you are supposed to notify them, except you don’t need to notify them if they have left work, if they left work because they were discharged for inadequate performance, fired, or violation of workplace rules, or for just cause, or involuntary departure, involuntary retirement, or expiration of the contract. You don’t have to notify them about those things. What would you notify them for, pray tell? That is “flabber” written. I submit whoever wrote this bill—it was not the Senators, I can assure you of that—ought to be ashamed of themselves. That was a deliberate evisceration of what on the surface sounds like a legitimate provision, totally unenforceable. There is no way under this provision DHS or the Department of Labor will be provided information about people who have been terminated from employment. Protections for U.S. workers—that is one of the goals the bill says it reaches. Under the bill, employers must prove that hiring an H-2C worker will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the United States, and that they did not and will not cause separation from employment of a U.S. worker employed by an employer within the 180-day period beginning 90 days before this H-2C petition is filed. Employers must also prove that they made good-faith efforts to recruit U.S. workers before they can hire an H-2C worker. That sounds good but, once again, things are not what they seem. As defined on page 263 of the bill, a U.S. worker includes not only citizens, it includes legal alien workers. And, amazingly, it also includes aliens who are “otherwise authorized under this act to be employed in the United States.” In other words, this provision provides protection for those who have been given legal status under amnesty, over and above, and provides them the same protection we provide to American citizens who are supposed to be given some protection against the flood of foreign labor. You have heard the deal. You have heard it said that the people who come to get amnesty—this is almost humorous—have got to pay their taxes. That is part of some sort of punishment. They make it sound like, in some way, you earned the right to be forgiven of your crime by paying your taxes. Everybody is supposed to pay their taxes. For heaven’s sake, we are all supposed to pay taxes. This is nothing but doing what you would expect any American to do. But under the bill, things are, once again, not quite what their sponsors have said, or what the language might lead you to believe. You have to read it carefully. Under the bill, an illegal alien who is getting amnesty only has to pay back taxes for the period of employment required in the INA, section 245(B)(A)(1)(d). This is on page 347 of the bill, if people would like to look. These are actually just 3 of the 5 years between April 5, 2001, and April 5, 2002. So the plain language of the bill doesn’t require them to pay all their back taxes at all. They get an option to pick and choose which 3 years they want to pay their taxes. Presumably, they can forget and not pay the taxes for the high years. How silly is that? This is really important. I think most Americans are pretty sophisticated. They know how the system works and the massive numbers we are talking about—the burden of proving payment of back taxes is on the Internal Revenue Service, pages 351 and 411. They have to prove it. How are they going to prove it? The IRS must prove that they owe the taxes. How will the IRS know if an illegal alien has worked off the books thereby avoiding paying any taxes? This is really an utter joke. It is a promotion put forth by those in support of the bill that I have heard repeatedly—that somehow it is supposed to make us believe that people have earned their right to be forgiven for violating the law, and they only have to pay back 3 of the last 5 years in taxes. What about American citizens? Do you think you can go down to Uncle [*S5033] Sam, Mr. President, and have 5 years of income and then be able to pick and choose which years you pay and you only pay 3 out of your last 5 years? Why don’t we let every American citizen have this benefit? Why do we only give it to people who entered the country illegally? You tell me. What about background checks? The bill requires the Department of Homeland Security to do them on illegal aliens. That is going to be exceedingly difficult. They are required to do it within 90 days. They have to protect our homeland. They have to handle all these provisions. I don’t think it can ever be done. That may sound like something important is going to happen, that all the people here illegally will have their backgrounds checked promptly, but the truth is that is not going to get done in that timeframe. How about fines? Let me state who they want to fine. A Federal agent, trying to do his duty to enforce the law and investigate fraudulent information provided by an illegal alien in their amnesty application, for law enforcement purposes, what happens to them if they take the amnesty application and actually examine it and find out it is fraudulent? What do they do? The agent would be fined $10,000. That fine, I note, is five times the amount the alien is able to post, $2,000, to get his amnesty from his illegal acts. There is no reason in the world Federal law enforcement officers should be barred from investigating and utilizing amnesty applications to prosecute criminal activities in America. There is no reason this ought to be protected other than it looks to me that some clever lawyer has realized if they can get this in the bill people can file false amnesty applications all day and no one will ever be able to investigate. Isn’t that horrible? That is what it looks like to me. Is that a sneaky lawyer trick? I ask you to make that judgment. It does not sound good to me. Page 363 of the bill. Look it up. How about the employers? They get tax amnesty. Employers of aliens applying for adjustment of status—amnesty—“shall not be subject to civil and criminal tax liability relating directly to the employment of such an alien.” That means a business that hired illegal workers does not have to pay the taxes they should have paid. Why? This encourages employers to violate our tax laws and not pay what they owe the Federal Government. They are excusing these employers and giving them amnesty from not withholding taxes. That is a very bad thing. Every American business knows they have to pay their withholding taxes. What about two small businesses, one hiring illegal aliens not paying Social Security, not paying withholding to the Government, and paying some low wage, and another one across the street doing all the right things, hiring American citizens, perhaps paying higher wages and withholding money and sending his Social Security money to the Federal Government, what message does that send to the good guy, to give complete amnesty to the guy who has manipulated the system and gotten away perhaps with tens of thousands of dollars in benefits that his competitor did not get? You cannot play games with the law like this. You cannot pick and choose people and allow them unilaterally to not have to pay their taxes. What about illegal alien protection? The alien and their families who file applications for amnesty “shall not be detained, determined inadmissible, deported, or removed until their applications are finally adjudicated, unless they commit a future act that renders them ineligible with amnesty.” With tens of millions of applications, this amnesty, this provision essentially guarantees an illegal alien years of protection in the United States, even if they do not qualify for the amnesty. We hear they have to pay the fine, the $2,000 fine, but it is not due right away. For those in the amnesty program, illegal aliens are supposed to pay a fine of $2,000. However, the way the bill is written, many illegal aliens may not have to pay the fine for 8 years. The bill says that the $2,000 fine has to be paid “prior to adjudication.” It is not required at the first. If it is left the way it is, the illegal alien can live, work and play in our country and not pay a cent of his fine for years. Perhaps they may even decide they do not want to pay it at all. This puts a financial burden on local taxpayers for the health, education, and the infrastructure costs that are not reimbursed for about 5 or 10 years. There are a number of other items. However, it is late; I will make these remarks part of the Record and will not belabor these points. It is clear the people who drafted this legislation had an agenda and the agenda was not to meet the expectations of the American people. The agenda was to create a facade and appearance of enforcement, an appearance of toughness in some instances. When you get into the meat of the provisions and get into the bill and study it, tucked away here and there are laws that eviscerate and eliminate the real effectiveness of those provisions. It was carefully done and deliberately done. This is a bill that should not become law. It is a bill that will come back to be an embarrassment to our Members who have supported it. I wish it were not so. I know how these things happen. You do not always have time to do everything you want to do. You try to do something you think is right, but ultimately in a bill as important as this one that has tremendous impact on the future of our country and our legal system and our commitment to the rule of law, we ought to get it right. We ought not to let this one slide by. It is not acceptable to say, let’s just pass something and we will send it to the House and maybe the House of Representatives will stand up and stop it and fix it. That is not acceptable for the great Senate of the United States. I strongly believe we are not ready to pass the bill. We are not ready to give it final consideration. I strongly believe it is a horrendous violation of the Committee on the Budget and that it is, as Mr. Rector said, a fiscal catastrophe if passed, and as such we ought not to waive the Budget Act but pull the bill from the floor and fix it. I yield the floor." Mr. Sessions is a Republican senator from Alabama. |
| Name: | Jennifer |
| E-mail address: | jennifersweet66@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | I am so sick of hearing about the suppossed ghost town effect the US finally deported all of the illegals.I dont want to hear about "the jobs Americans are unwilling to do". We all know that the illegals drive wages down so low that these jobs are far less attractive yes. But as far as this ghost town effect, how about the government start insisting that all people collecting welfare checks get out and do these jobs and earn their checks rather than collecting something for nothing. WORK OR NO CHECK! SIMPLE!
We all know a huge part of these people collecting these checks and giving nothing in return are illegals as well! |
| Name: | Over run |
| Comments: | Thanks so much for taking the time to set up this website. This morning,I was, like many American citizens, discouraged that illegals are marching for their rights to be here ILLEGALLY (??!!),yet there seemed to be no outlet for those of us who have had enough of the problems caused by them. Through your site, I found links to other relavent websites and planned anti-ILLEGAL alien protests. OHH by the way..I am of Mexican heritage myself! I guess it is always hard to accept when the free ride is coming to an end...and the free ride of the illegal alien is just about over!
Thanks again! |
| Name: | CitizenAlertNetwork |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.KarenGrossFoster.com |
| Comments: | Tom DeLay the opportunist is at it again. At his recent conference in Washington titled "The War on Christians and the Values Voter in 2006", the man who has enabled much unChristian activity is now dragging the name of Jesus, Christ and Christianity into the gutter in his desperate attempt to maintain his status as a career politician.
Nowhere has the war against Christian values been more evident than in Tom's own hometown of Sugar Land where this past Christmas a menorah burned brightly next to a "Holiday Season" tree and Santa Claus on the city hall plaza. Nowhere was anything about Jesus visible. In his district, the land has been mercilessly raped with totally out-of-control development resulting in habitat destruction which has left multitudes of God's creatures wandering the streets, injured and homeless. Developers, homebuilders, landscapers and other DeLay supporters mock American values by flaunting their Mexican day laborers who have taken thousands of jobs that Americans could have held. Thanks to his proclamation that "he is an Israeli at heart" and cozying up to that AIPAC and Abramoff lobby money, Tom DeLay's district, the United States government, the media and everything else have been taken over by the true enemies of America, those who would displace us in our own nation and have our loved ones die in endless wars for their commercial interests. It is time to put this opportunist career politician where he belongs - either back harassing bugs or on the unemployment rolls. |
| Name: | Claire |
| Comments: | You people need to understand that illegal immigrants work just as hard-even harder- than many Americans. The economy would suffer greatly without immigrants. Immigrants helped make America what it is now! Isnt America here to help EVERYONE have a beter life? |
| Name: | Angel |
| E-mail address: | Angel@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/south269cutter/can-women-take-levitra.htm |
| Comments: | Just try can women take levitra |
| Name: | Gagarin |
| E-mail address: | Gagarin@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/acne136propecia/birth-control-pills-work.htm |
| Comments: | Listen, here that I have found: birth control pills work |
| Name: | Gagarin |
| E-mail address: | Gagarin@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/shooting422get/caterpillar-d2-crawler.htm |
| Comments: | You never saw such caterpillar d2 crawler |
| Name: | Mnemony |
| E-mail address: | Mnemony@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/new827effects/dictionary-for-pills.htm |
| Comments: | Welcome friends to dictionary for pills |
| Name: | Angel |
| E-mail address: | Angel@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/opioid814work/antique-caterpillar-tractor-model-22-auction-results.htm |
| Comments: | Welcome friends to antique caterpillar tractor model 22 auction results |
| Name: | carlos menem |
| Comments: | nunca nos van a poder sacar de usa manga de terroristas hijosdeputa |
| Name: | rhadts1 |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@adelphia.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | I am kind of torn on the post just below this one. I should take it down because it is offensive. On the other, I am offended every day when I am around people that refuse to speak english. I am not opposed to family talking among themselves, but for God's sake, every time I go into ANY business establishment where the person behind the counter speaks spanish I have to endure this needless banter back and forth in a language that is FOREIGN to me and about seventy percent of the people here in America. It is bad enough that I have to let most of these people walk among my own when they are nothing more than a common criminal. If you include the law breakers from before that dopey Ronald Reagan gave them amnesty, we are talking about more than thirty million people, and I consider them all criminals that should be in jail or deported. The people in control of this country are liars and scoundrels that should be publicly flogged and deported as well.
JD |
| Name: | David |
| E-mail address: | hidiver@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | Hey there Chavo, it is you and the rest of the hispanics that devide asshole. It starts in high school with MECHA, your own little club that excludes anyone that doesn't look and talk like you. You also devide by refusing to speak english you fucking piece of shit.This is a constant source of contention with EVERYONE else in this country. They can't stand to be around hispanics not because of the color of your skin, not because of how you look but because of how you talk. You walk around speaking that fucking gibberish and people fucking hate it. Yet you refuse to speak english. Why don't you just do the honorable thing and go home to mexico and be a good little beaner you fucking wetback. |
| Name: | Sarah |
| Comments: | You act like you're going to be able to turn all of the illegal immigrants in, and be done with it. Do you *honestly* think that the U.S. government doesn't know who is here and who isn't? Each time someone works with a fake SSN, a red flag is thrown in the air to the government as to who and where. Do you know why they don't ship them all out? It's because they're paying for YOUR social security for when you retire. All of those people working with fake SSNs still get their social security taken out of their check each week, but they will never be able to claim a DIME. I realize that the Social Security system is very broken, but where do you think all of that money comes from? |
| Name: | American citizen |
| E-mail address: | xyzunknown29@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | in California, an auto insurance company hires illegal aliens. These
aliens don't have any type of documents or legal papers. They don't even have a driver license or any type of any IDs. The owner of the company avoids paying Taxes and gets paid for the services mostly in cash. So no one knows exactly how much he is charging his customers. The illegal employees get paid in cash. All the above is not the worst of it all. The employees handle the clients' personal data such as Driver license numbers, insurance, addresses, DMV records , etc.... So imagine what happens to the clients' personal information!!! They end up on the street on fake ID's to be sold on the street for other illegal aliens. Or the personal data is used for applying for credit cards. What happened to the laws in the USA I know this company and I know one illegal alien working there . She drives without insurance or DL. Her cell phone is under some one's name , her car is registered to some one else. She gets paid in Cash , pays no tax and handle the customers personal data. She uses some Info for her personal usage such as registering cars under their names. She has a fake social security number. She even provided her dad with a stolen SS# , her dad filed bankraptcy on this stolen SS# Who should I report this to ? I want to keep my identity unknown since she got friends who could harm me . Thanks ... |
| Name: | Jose |
| E-mail address: | chavo_ela@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | Do you think people in their right mind actually take you serious? Have you no life? Your level of awareness is far below that of the average moron. People like you divide rather than unite for the common good. If you have any kind of sense at all you would read what you actually write and conclude that at the end of the day you are still a moron. |
| Name: | Twister |
| E-mail address: | Twister@yahoo.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://uk.geocities.com/control559line/top-10-diet-pill.htm |
| Comments: | Glad to present you top 10 diet pill |
| Name: | John De Gennaro |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@adelphia.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | Dear stupid spamming assholes, this dreambook does not accept HTML code. If you would do a search through the page you would see that. But you people are too friggin stupid to take a look at the source codes. Just thought I would let you know.
JD |
| Name: | Scott |
| E-mail address: | dreamer2254@earthlink.net |
| Comments: | Dude, dig the site man. Can I email you some stuff I have found out about Dreier? Let me know. I like the way they keep hitting your site in Washington.
David |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | Just a quick note on Jason's website, wehirealiens.com. I have received a few emails from people that are named on his site that are complaining that it is a lot like Mcarthyism. I think that you people simply know that what you are doing is wrong. It is againt the law in the United States to employ illegal aliens. That's it. There is no arguing this point. So stop employing them and clear your conscience and have your name removed from the website. Stop being a greedy little pig and start paying your employees what they are worth you cheap S.O.B.
JD |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | Most people in this country do not like illegal immigration. Those same people tend to try to get by on the cheap with everything they pay for. For example, when they hire a gardener, they will shop around for the cheapest one they can find. So most people hire illegal aliens. Once during a John and Ken Show, a mexican worker was on the phone with them and asked John, "Who mows his yard". John was shell shocked. He answered a mexican that is probably illegal. What I am getting at here is most people in this country will scream that they hate illegal immigration but hire them anyway because they are looking to save a buck. I mow my own yard because I refuse to hire an illegal. But the reason they can do things so cheaply is because they carry NO INSURANCE, so if one of them lops off a finger in your yard, your homeowners insurance is going to take the spanking for it. They pay no income tax. Look at the back of the check you give them. If it is signed by the gardener and not stamped "for deposit only" then he is simply cashing it out and not paying a dime of tax on it. I am a small business owner and I can't compete with that. I have to pay taxes or I get thrown in jail. I have to carry insurance or I loose my house. So the next time you tell me you don't hire illegals perhaps you should think before you speak. |
| Name: | Disgusted |
| Comments: | Now I realize why so many Americans won't turn in companies that hire undocumented workers. I turned a multi million dollar in to wehirealiens.com. A few days later, they had the nerve to turn in my company (I'm a one woman company with zero helpers and I work 12 hours a day for the past 8 years). I work from home, my landlord who lives next door is an attorney and everyone knows that I have never hired an undocumented worker. Everyone except wehirealiens.com that is. I did write to them and hopefully they'll be kind enough to remove my name, address and home phone number from their site. Thank you for at least giving me a place to rant. |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | This hit appears daily on my site monitor. This is from the office of David Dreier in Washington D.C. They look at us every day without fail. Gee Davey, are you worried about a poor pool man ruining your chances at re-election. You should be. I am right here Dave, waiting for you to screw up again.
John Domain Name house.gov ? (United States Government) IP Address 143.231.249.# (Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives) 143.231.249.141 ISP Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts) State : District of Columbia City : Washington Lat/Long : 38.8933, -77.0146 (Map) Language English (United States) en-us Operating System Microsoft Win2000 Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits Time of Visit Nov 8 2005 12:25:37 pm Last Page View Nov 8 2005 12:25:37 pm Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.wehirealiens.com/ Visit Entry Page http://www.dojak.net/ Visit Exit Page http://www.dojak.net/ Time Zone UTC-8:00 PST - Pacific Standard Time PDT - Pacific Daylight Saving Time Visitor's Time Nov 8 2005 11:25:37 am Visit Number 309 |
| Name: | Robert |
| Comments: | You people are a bunch of racist. I cannot believe you can talk like this and get away with it. You realy should be ashamed of your selfs. I hope you all are happy with your racist friends. |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Comments: | Well, let's see here. You are a Mexican, living in Tiajuana and you have the audacity to goof on me? What an asshole. For all that are concerned, here is this malcontent's information I found. So he is a Mexican that is a war vet and he patrols the border??? The only thing you are patrolling for are holes to get more illegals in you coyote. What a troll. By the by, Itally is spelled with only one "L" there Hector. Posser is spelled with only one "S", spik is spelled with a "C" , Itallians is spelled with one "L", and I am not a hippie nor have I ever been a hippie. Next time you post here Hector you should get your facts straight and learn how to use a spell checker dumb ass. Also, you have never posted here from that IP address or from Mexico for that matter. The only post's that I remove are spam from gambling sites.
John the GUIDO not spic. Spic by the way is a derogatory word used to describe PUERTO RICANS!!! What an idiot. |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Comments: | I am wondering what someone from Larchmont New York, that works for Cablevision is doing looking at this site at 2:00 am instead of doing the work that Cablevision is paying you to do. Judging by your comments here I would be willing to bet that you are of hispanic derivation and think that anyone that is outspoken about hispanics is a racist. What we here at DOJAK like to call that is "NARROW MINDED BIGOTRY". You are so blinded by your visceral hatred of anyone that disagrees with you on any issue regarding hispanics that you can't even wage a decent argument about the subject without becoming enraged to the point of name calling and random accusations about people you don't even know personally. We at DOJAK simply tell people like you to grow up. Have fun doing nothing for Cablevision and getting paid for it.
John |
| Name: | Outraged |
| Comments: | Your rabid comments about illegal aliens are appalling. You should be very very ashamed of yourself |
| Name: | Outraged |
| Comments: | Your rabid comments about illegal aliens are appalling. You should be very very ashamed of yourself |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | Hey John and Ken,
Yesterday's election proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that California voters are among the dumbest people on earth. I can't believe that all of those lies and rhetoric were bought hook, line and sinker. It was so painfully obvious that those friggin union lackey teachers and fire fighters were full of excrement. I would like to add here that ALL of you government hacks should be ashamed of yourselves. You are selfish greedy little bastards just like the very people that your screwy unions pit you against on a daily basis. How ANY of you can get up in the morning and look at yourselves in the mirror is amazing to me. I have a lot of teachers and firefighters as clients and let me tell all of you reading this that these people live better than most of us. I don't have ANY fire fighters for clients that have a wife that works. They make so much money they don't need a second income to survive like most of us. These rat bastards even brag to me that they only work TEN DAYS A MONTH!!! For those of you in California that equals 120 days a year!!! They make $85,000.00 to $150.000.00 a year and COMPLAIN ABOUT IT!!! Most of them run businesses on the side. I have one L.A. County fireman that owns one of the biggest swimming pool construction businesses in Los Angeles County. When I asked him why he remained on the department he said he wanted to keep his benefits and retirement. He makes more then a half a million a year building pools and he is worried about bennies??? What a greedy son of a bitch. He even had the "NO ON 75" signs in his front yard of his two million dollar house!!! The same thing with teachers. Here is San Dimas I couldn't tell you what these people make, but they all drive 60,000.00 vehicles and live in the nicest neighborhoods in the area. I understand that some of them make $70,000.00 a year. They only work 183 days a year in the classroom. LESS THEN HALF THE YEAR AND THEY COMPLAIN ABOUT IT. I don't know exactly what it is they do with our kids all day but it isn't teaching. That job is primarily left up to us parents. My kids come home with an average of three hours of homework a day. When we sit down and help them they tell us that they simply have what is known as "quiet time" in most of their classes. When questioned about what "quiet time" actually was, they said "well we just read stories." .... EVEN IN THEIR MATH CLASSES!!! So they bring most of their classroom lessons home for the parents to do the teaching job for them. IT's like my wife and I are back in school again!!! These people essentially do nothing and want more money for it and don't ever have to worry about being fired!! This is what I call my "REACTION" phase. Now that son of a bitch DREIER pissed me off enough to create DOJAK.NET. I aim to get another site up to combat these unions. I don't have much yet but I will keep you ALL up to date with my new site that is going to help topple these unions that are crippling the great state of California. I will probably have it up in the next week or two and I will forward the URL. We need to stop trying to knock the fruit off the tree and just cut the fucking thing off at the trunk! John De Gennaro http://dojak.net |
| Name: | Ace |
| E-mail address: | youreasmellyspik@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://gobacktoitally.com |
| Comments: | Dear john De Gennaro,
After reading that heart felt story about Giussepe getting in line for 11 yrs to the lottery and walking barefoot in the snow with snakes... I now understand why you always remove my postings. I'm a war vet and I patrol the border. All you do is talk S***. YOu are a hippie posser. But what can I expect from the grandchild of a catholic-spik reject from Itally. In fact your family is pretty much made up of mexicans from europe right? Isn't that what itallians are? Bottom of the barrel illiterates, who caused crime, are tacky and a curse on american society and institutions. Yeah You are so much above a mexican. |
| Name: | Gary |
| E-mail address: | wakeupwhitepeople@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | Dear john De Gennaro,
After reading that heart felt story about Giussepe getting in line for 11 yrs to the lottery and walking barefoot in the snow with snakes... I now understand why you always remove my postings. I'm a war vet and I patrol the border. All you do is talk S***. YOu are a hippie posser. But what can I expect from the grandchild of a catholic-spik reject from Itally. In fact your family is pretty much made up of mexicans from europe right? Isn't that what itallians are? Bottom of the barrel illiterates, who caused crime, are tacky and a curse on american society and institutions. Yeah You are so much above a mexican. |
| Name: | Jorge |
| Comments: | YOU AR ALL RACIST IS WHAT YOU ARE. WE ARE TAKING OVER ALL OF US AND YOU TO WILL BE GONE SOON. GO HOME WHITY. WE WILL SOON BE IN CHARGE TO SO GO BACK TO ITALY YOU STOPID IDEIT. |
| Name: | John De Gennaro |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Comments: | George,
My father came to America in 1931 at the ripe old age of 3 years old. He is the second youngest of nine children born to Salvatore and Josephina De Gennaro. My grandfather comes from North Italy. He stood in line each year for 11 years with his name in a lottery to get passage to America. After 11 years they were able to come to New York where they settled after passing through Ellis Island. in 1941 the whole family became naturalized citizens by attending a school and passing a test. Because my grandparents did not know any english, they would have my aunts and uncles (their children) teach them their own english lessons each day after school. They understood that the only way to be successful in this new country was to speak english. They were very successful as were most of their children. Some of the reason they were successful was because they ASSIMILATED. Rather than sitting by and expecting everyone to cater to their every need and learn to speak spanish, they learned to speak english. They didn't simply come to American with a list of demands the way a lot of hispanics do. As for immigration being "bad" for America, those words never left my mouth as I am the product of immigrants. The difference is that we came here legally and tried as best we could to obey the laws of the land. ILLEGAL ALIENS come here and expect the same treatment as legal citizens. This is a slap in the face to all of us that obeyed the rules and laws of this great nation. JD |
| Name: | George |
| E-mail address: | biancas85@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | You do have a point here John...
thank you for forgiving our abillity to spell... i agree with you in the sence that the people who are soundingracist here is us "hispanics" and this tends to happen more around all minorities who tend to blame whites for all racism, this probably comes from lack of knowlege...because racism is just not about color or which race is better than the others... You have ask the following question; "YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN TO ME, A MERE SIMPLETON, HOW AND WHY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR AMERICA JUST ONE MORE TIME .... PLEASE!!!!" To this all i have to say is...look at me. i came here not because i wanted but because my parents brought me here for my own good when i was maybe 13. Today, i am thankful for that, for them bringing me to this great country were i am getting a college education thing which i could proabably wouldnt have been able to do back in my birth place. Struggling to learn the language i dedicated my self to school because i wanted to break that cycle and negative stereotypes people have against my race. "oh this is why my english is not that good as your, once again sorry.. up to this point am still learning the language am getting there" but anyway, So i came here, was able to maintaing a 3.9 average in high school this gave me a full ride scholarship to a well known school... Saint Marys College of California, sounds familiar? is a Catholic private school in Moraga California, bay area. Well now in college as a history major in my senior year am working with the state Government doing research in "American" history. So in a away am contributing to the books your childrens will be reading some day in college. thats just one of the maybe few but good examples of why immigrants are good for this country...but yes...research shows it that minorities tend to get in trouble some more than whites...but what can u do? i know your probably going to answer,"kick them out of this country" may i ask where u come from? ok yeah you where born here but what is your back ground Italian? dutch? English? so if we talk about people leaving this land because they are not "americans" lets go back in history... or should i say "can i help pack?" George |
| Name: | John De Gennaro |
| Comments: | The amazing thing about the posts on this page by hispanics is how amazingly racist they are. I am even willing to forgive the piss poor ability to spell and write in english, but you people are the true racists here. The problem in America today is Americans of all colors are so afraid of being labeled "racist" that they allow their opinions to be silenced by one word... RACIST!! We are all entitled to our own opinions. Next time someone calls you a racist do what I do: I tell them to keep calling me and everybody else that disagrees with them a racist too. Because the more they use the word, the more marginalized it becomes until eventually it will mean nothing at all. Can you imagine the look on their faces? You would have to see it to believe it.
John |
| Name: | VIVA LA RAZA |
| Comments: | WE ARE TAKING OVER YOU COUNTRY GRINGO! YOU ARE GOIGN TO HAVTO BACK TO ENGLAND YOU NOTSI AND WE ARE GOING TO MAKE THE PART OF MEXICO AGAIN!!! |
| Name: | John De Gennaro |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dojak.net |
| Comments: | This one is a gem ....
ONE DAY WITHOUT A MEXICAN, JUST ONE DAY TO MAKE ALL THIS CRAZY PEOPLE TO THINK DIFERENT ABOUT HISPANICS THIS IS NOT ONLY ABOUT WHO'S LIVING LEGAL OR ELEGAL IS ABOUT RACE, WE ARE BETTER THAN ANY OTHER RACE IN THIS COUNTRY, AND YOU GUYS KNOW THIS ALREADY THAT'S WHY IF YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING NOW TO STOP US TEN YEARS FROM NOW NOT ONLY WE'R GOING TO BE BETTER BUT MORE AND THIS NATION IS GOING TO BE THE BEST IN THE WORLD, INSTEAD OF FIGHTING AGAINST DRUGS OR CRIMINALS YOU GUYS WASTE YOUR TIME DOING SAMETHING LIKE THIS, THAT'S SO STUPID. Now let's examine these statements individually. First, you are proclaiming your race, the mexican race as somehow being better than all other races, which is racist in and of itself. But just before that statement, you claim that this is about racism, not illegals. Then you go on to say that the more of you that are here the better this country will become... which again is racist .... er ..... or according to the definition of racist as it pertains to most minorities. Now for the sake of argument, let's delve into drugs and criminals. Most drugs are smuggled here through Mexico by MEXICANS .... ER ..... DUH!!!!! When it comes to crime here in California, about half of the California prison population is HISPANIC!!!! DUH .... ER ..... Now for the final statement about how stupid we are. Take a close look at your english skills. What an abomination. Your grammar is deplorable and your spelling is elementary at best. Before you try have a debate with even a five year old, you should learn how to read and write ENGLISH!!! John |
| Name: | John De Gennaro |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.dojak.net |
| Comments: | Also, the fruit picking jobs in America used to be done by Americans until illegal immigrants came along and watered down the wage base by
working for peanuts. They have done the same irreparable damage to the construction industry. Jobs that once paid $30.00 and more an hour now pay $10.00 an hour. And for you Rhodes Scholars out there, I would like you to explain something to a simpleton like myself. Thirty dollars an hour equals $1,200.00 for a forty hour work week. $1,200.00 dollars a week equals $4,800.00 a month. $10.00 an hour equals $400.00 a week $400.00 a week equals $1,600.00 a month. At a twenty five percent tax rate, the tax on $4,800.00 is $1,200.00 a month. At a twenty-five percent tax rate the tax on $1,600.00 is $400.00 a month. $4,800.00 minus $1,600.00 is $3,200.00 So if we examine the equations here we can only come to one conclusion. By hiring people that make one fourth as much money to do the same amount of work, we take $3,200.00 out of the economy. We also take $800.00 a month out of the tax base. If that $3,200.00 is spent every month, the sales tax would be about $256.00. This too is lost because the money is no longer earned and spent. Now follow closely here. If you take the $1,600.00 and send half, or $800.00 back to Mexico then you only have $800.00 left to spend here in America. The sales tax on $800.00 dollars is about $64.00. Now consider that most illegal immigrants don't pay hardly any income tax or sales tax at all. WITH ALL OF THIS BEING SAID, YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN TO ME, A MERE SIMPLETON, HOW AND WHY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR AMERICA JUST ONE MORE TIME .... PLEASE!!!! |
| Name: | John |
| E-mail address: | rhadts1@earthlink.net |
| Comments: | I have been updating all of the links on my site. If you use IE then you need to hit CTRL and the refresh button once in a while to refresh. I would suggest using Netscape or Mozilla because it will refresh automatically and it isn't prone to attacks like IE.
JD |