Welcome to my nifty Dreambook, a free guestbook service from New Dream Network and the DreamHost!If you have a minute, please add your entry to those below by signing my Dreambook!
| Name: | Kay Coombes |
| E-mail address: | coombeskay@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Thank you for carrying outimportant work. |
| Name: | C Stanway |
| Comments: | I am currently a third year student studying a BSc in Policing and Criminal Investigation, at Staffordshire University and I am currently writing a report on the case of Jeremy Bmaber.
Your book has given me a great insight into the case, and raised many flaws in the forensics, police inital searches and Jeremy's original trail. Keep up the good work, and I hope that in the future the full picture of what happened, that September night at White House Farm, will come to light and that justice will finally be served. Many thanks. |
| Name: | Robert Evans |
| E-mail address: | sarahwoolgar@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | The case of Jeremy Bamber has always fascinated me. I remain unsure weather he is guilty or not guilty having read the evidence. But what I think is grossly unfair is that Jeremy was convicted by a majority verdict based on circumstancial evidence and I personally feel that it is grossly unfair on that basis to condem somebody to prison on a whole life tariff. There needs to be stronger evidence. I am also sceptical of the evidence of Essex Police. Further more it is very harsh that Jeremy has not been allowed to have his category A status downgraded.I would love to hear other peoples views and comments on this case. My regards Robert Evans. |
| Name: | jonathan |
| E-mail address: | scahillholly@aol.com |
| Comments: | hi scott..in the middle of reading your jeremy bamber book..always thought he was guilty but now i,m having second thoughts..the evidence against him seems pretty flimsy and circumstantial...destroying the exhibits in 1996 seems to be a major error along with the botched crime scene investigation carried out in 1985..i,m sure if it went to trial now he,d be aqquited..looking forward to the rest of the book and hopefully seeing jeremy free in the near future..keep up the good work...jonathan |
| Name: | sue |
| E-mail address: | sbostock108@aol.co.uk |
| Comments: | scott ive ordered your new book because im looking forward to reading it, i want to find out more about the barbara mayo case are the police opening the case again, and just wondered if that chap who the police wanted to interview was ever found ? 38 years on. |
| Name: | dawn |
| E-mail address: | sexy_katriana@live.co.uk |
| Comments: | thank you for your book on jeremy bamber...i think he is innocent i hope he will have his day and be released |
| Name: | Taylor |
| E-mail address: | taylor@gmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://carpingalmere.50megs.com/wellbutrin/bupropion.html |
| Comments: | Our partners : <a rel="dofollow" href="http://3323190.yoyohost.com/oxycodone/buy-oxycodone-online.html">buy oxycodone online</a> is about buy oxycodone online... <a rel="dofollow" href="http://martor.1hwy.com/tylenol-with-codeine/tylenol-pain-killer.html">tylenol pain killer</a> is about tylenol pain killer... Haven't had much luck finding such a good info! GREAT JOB! Visit us too! |
| Name: | Yasmin Dolman |
| E-mail address: | yasminduck@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hiya, i am very much looking forward to reading
UNSOLVED MURDERS IN AND AROUND DERBY i can't wait until its published! im getting it as one of my christmas presents because where i live in swadlincote, one of the paths i walked down was called 'MEXICAN JOE WAY' so i searched him on google and i found this site! Cant wait to read the book, i bet it will be amazing. From Yasmin. |
| Name: | Daniele Hammond |
| E-mail address: | dan-hammond@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hello Scott,
I have very much enjoyed reading your books - so far! And I certainly feel that I trust you as an author : ) Please keep up the good work. Dan x |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | After having had a few technical issues I am pleased to say that my guestbook is now working, so please do leave a message.
Thanks! |
| Name: | D.B |
| Comments: | Just finished the Jeremy Bamber book- fantastic reading - now hopfully he will be a free man really soon. Having visited the whereabouts etc... ( i live in Maldon ) there seems to be someting not right. If he was to have left the farm house and travel over fields ,along the sea wall, pass the osea caravan park he would have gone a long way pass his house then having to ride back either over more mud or back along the main road! It dont add up.Also it would have taken a lot lot longer than 15 mins. Also what about the extended family were they interviewed about there where abouts etc..on that night.They seem to have a big grudge against jerermy,and now they have the lot. Perhaps they stitched him up.( just my view ) |
| Name: | N |
| E-mail address: | free_murdoch@yahoo.com.au |
| Comments: | I would like to say that even though I may not like the look of Joanne Lee's I still have thought about her evidence with an open mind. It's full of hole's and inconsistent tales. Bradley Murdoch has admitted to a lot of things but never once this horrendous crime. Think about it, if the car was moved there had to have been a second person driving it, because she says no-one came back. So how did he drive two vehicles at once? DNA evidence was found, 2 years later by the same "expert" who sent Lindy Chamberlian to jail by saying paint spatter was foetal blood. Miss Lee's denied certain things that were proven to be thruthful, then admitted to practice the hands behind to front before going to court, she was shown pictures of Murdoch, his dog, and vehilce after describing them differently, then positively identified them in court while denying at first she had seen them previously. I may be believe that Murdoch is innocent, but is the real evidence points to him then so be it, but I cant see that happening. And in response to the profitting on the sensationalising on peoples lives and hurting victims and families, did anyone stop to think about murdoch's family? They didn't ask to be hounded and put down by this, he wasn't allowed to go to his parents funeral's because he couldn't tell the police where Falconio's body was. That to me is showning that something is truely wrong here, he would have given anything to be able to say good-bye but couldn't. Just because he looks like a criminal, (which no-one can help how we look, especially if we've been wrongy imprisoned then set free then re-arrested on the first step out of court), has admitted to some criminal activity does not make him a murderer. I think the legal system is in serious trouble if a person can be convicted of murder when no body has been found, is that person really dead? I fully believe we no longer have a justice system as there is no justice, it's just a legal system! |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Comments: | I agree with the comments below. It is disgusting to attack Joanne Lees based on her personality. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and I must say I have strong reservations about her account, but that is not the same as saying she's guilty of the crime. There are many, many question marks surrounding her story but does that mean her story is untrue? I would rather concentrate ont he facts. As I see it, there is no explanation as to how Falconio's vehicle ended up far away, in a ditch. How did it get there? If guilty, Murdoch drove his truck but according to Lees no one came back. So how did the van Falconio and Lees had been driving in, get moved? |
| Name: | NM |
| E-mail address: | nmyatt@yahoo.co.uk |
| Comments: | It's disgusting to read comments from some people like "I just don't like Joanne Lees" the implication being that therefore she must be guilty. These are the kind of comments that are made by the pitchfork-wielding yokels that in bygone times burned innocent women as witches.
Overwhelming evidence points to Murdoch. Poor Joanne Lees has suffered three-fold - experiencing an horrific ordeal, the loss of her boyfriend and the accusations by the media, fuelling small-minded conspiracy theorists like some of your readers. Murdoch has been convicted in a court of law on many points of evidence. He has appealed and lost those appeals. Of course, if you believe that there is inconsistent evidence then you are free to investigate the facts. If you do so with full objectivity and no prejudice, then you can keep your integrity and respect. Just consider the potential damage to innocent victims and families that will have to endure more false accusations, while you profit from sensationalising the unfortunate events of others. |
| Name: | trish worster |
| E-mail address: | trishywishy@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | hi scott ive finished the jeremy bamber book it was brilliant im convinced jeremy is innocent maybe now others will to a huge thankyou scott |
| Name: | trish worster |
| E-mail address: | trishywishy@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | hi scott just finished reading your book on jeremy bamber fantastic what more can i say i know jeremy is innocent ive always truly believed this your writing helped free barry george lets hope the same justice will now be shown for jeremy thanks scott |
| Name: | Jaahda Jinnah |
| E-mail address: | jaahda@westnet.com.au |
| Comments: | I stumbled across this page whilst researching the Bradley Murdoch case (Peter Falconio).
If ever i found the time I could write a few true crime books myself. I've finished one about an extremely controversial case here in Australia. I've come at crime from several angles; I've worked in prisons for a number of years and been the confidant of some serial killers and violent offenders. I've studied criminology and profiling techniques. And last, but definitely not least I have headed up a few successful Psychic Detective cases. Perhaps I will try one day to find more time to write. I do however have a few small articles on a freelance writing site (Associated Press). Thanks :-) |
| Name: | Tracy |
| E-mail address: | cuckoochick1965@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | Just to say ...Brilliant webpage And good luck with the new book.......keep up the good work
Trace xxxxxx |
| Name: | trish worster |
| E-mail address: | trishywishy@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hi scott just to say ive just ordered your book about jeremy bamber from amazon i cant begin to say how much im looking foreward to reading your views on this case as ive said before i write to jeremy in jail fully believing him to be innocent wiil post my comments once ive finished the book thanks |
| Name: | S C Lomax |
| Comments: | The only evidence is DNA. What other evidence is there? No eyewitness identification, no confession, no murder weapon, no body, no fingerprints, no motive, no textile fibres. So what other evidence is there? |
| Name: | JP |
| Comments: | Anyone who says that "The only evidence against Bradley Murdoch is DNA" plainly hasn't read any of the appeal decisions in his case. The statement is clearly wrong. Why write a book about something you know nothing about? |
| Name: | S K |
| Comments: | The way you put the needs of others first, is truly exceptional. You are very special xxxx |
| Name: | Fiz |
| Comments: | I'm with you there, David. I just don't like Joanna Lees (I don't know why) and I don't believe a word of her "evidence" or the miraculously late DNA "discoveries". |
| Name: | trish |
| E-mail address: | trishywishy@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hi Scott put Barry George into search engine it came up with a fascinating article you had written i write to Jeremy Bamber in jail i believe him to be innocent dont know if youve covered his case at all but am going back on the net to see if their are any other articles i can find that youve written now i know about your work ill look out for your books etc in the future thanks |
| Name: | Fiz |
| Comments: | That would be great, David. Joanne Lees comes across to me as if she couldn't tell the truth if her life depended on it.
|
| Name: | David Jagger |
| E-mail address: | dajagger@tiscali.co.uk |
| Comments: | Great News about Barry George. Now lets see Bradley Murdoch back in court to right another miscarriage of justice. |
| Name: | Scott Lomax |
| E-mail address: | ScLomax2004@yahoo.co.uk |
| Comments: | Thanks to everyone who supported barry. My full comments will appear on my site soon. I did 5 tv interviews and a number of radio interviews so my views have been well aired |
| Name: | Fiz |
| Comments: | Just saw the news on my servers homepage and screamed! Oh God, I am so thrilled for Barry George and his sister Michelle! Scott, you must be so happy and thank you for writing that book. It put into words what I felt about was wrong with the case! xxx |
| Name: | Brigitte Butcher |
| Homepage URL: | http://w.ww.justice4kevinnunn.co.uk |
| Comments: | Great news on Barry's release today, just heard!!!
Listening to the 6 oclock news it would appear the police have a'stitch-up manual' to convict innocent people when they can't find the true perpretrator - character assasination, stalking and telling lies - this all sounds so so familiar - see my brothers web site!! The fight goes on!!!!!!!!!!!!! Brigitte Butcher |
| Name: | Carl |
| Comments: | Well done Scott, Your hard work with JFB has paid off.
|
| Name: | Scott Lomax |
| Comments: | Carl,
I haven't heard from James lately. It's hard getting contact with him, with him living on the other side of the world. I don't think anything new has occurred. |
| Name: | Scott Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax2004@yahoo.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Fiz, thanks for clarifying that. yes, it's regurgitationw ith bad character evidence thrown in. It's all rubbish really. |
| Name: | Carl |
| Comments: | Scott
Please pass on my best wishes to everyone at JFB. I am sure the defence have done an excellent job. Just out of interest, how are you getting on with the case of James Reyos. That always struck me as a weak conviction? |
| Name: | Fiz |
| Comments: | Scott, I don't mean the defence have nothing, but the prosecution are trying to pull the same stunt as last time, and it did not convince me then. |
| Name: | Scott Lomax |
| Comments: | Fiz, the defence is good. What more could you have wanted? Everything is covered that could have been covered without losing credibility. Discussion of serbian hitmen would have caused a conviction almost without doubt. If things weren't covered during the defence case itself, they were through cross examination when the prosecution were giving their case.
All the best, Scott |
| Name: | Carl |
| Comments: | Thanks Scott, that is very much appreciated.
|
| Name: | Fiz |
| Comments: | Thank you, Scott. It sounds like the whole lot of nothing the prosecution had last time!
|
| Name: | Scott Lomax |
| Comments: | Yes certainly, although the defence hasn't totally finished yet. The case itself has but they'll be saying a lot in their closing statement on Tuesday (unless there's another delay).
The defence opened with a number of statements from people who were on Gowan Avenue on the morning of the murder, each stating that they saw no one loitering. That's crucial because it contradicts the prosecution statement that Barry (or indeed the killer) was waiting all morning for Jill to turn up. A number of witnesses said no one was loitering or even seen at 11:20am, ten minutes before the murder. The defence then called an expert on textile fibres who told the court that the textile fibre allegedly from Barry’s trousers was insufficient proof. He said not enough tests were performed on it to be sure of its origin and that the tests had given different results. One time the test showed the fibre on Jill’s raincoat was a match. The second time the test showed there wasn’t a match. The test wasn’t performed a third time. The witness said the tests had been inconclusive and also pointed out that Barry’s jacket which he allegedly wore that day shed lots of fibres but there were no fibres from his jacket on Jill’s raincoat. They then called a witness to discuss Barry’s epilepsy and cognitive impairment. The witness told the court that Barry’s severe epilepsy meant his police interviews could not be relied upon and that he could be misconstrued as lying. He then said that Barry’s learning difficulties put him in the bottom one percent of the population in respect to his ability to plan and organise his activities. The defence then brought a key witness who had been on Gowan Avenue on the morning of the murder. She claims to have been parked across the road from Jill’s unlived in house. This isn’t in dispute. She says at 7am she was getting boxes from 17 Gowan Avenue and packing them into her car. This activity took around 15 minutes. The woman said she did not see a car double parked next to hers and she saw no man. This contradicts the prosecution’s key witness who says at 7am there was a double parked car with Barry George wiping its windscreen! Truly good evidence! The defence closed with Clegg telling the jury that Barry had been stopped, questioned, arrested etc 17 times between 1980 and 1999 and that he had been questioned routinely along with hundreds of others about the Rachel Nickell murder, a crime which DNA later showed was committed by another man. This was mentioned to show that Barry could quite innocently have believed he was going to be questioned over the Jill Dando murder resulting in his need to find out where he was that day. The prosecution had claimed an innocent man wouldn’t have needed to determine an alibi. |
| Name: | Fiz |
| E-mail address: | FROrrBunt@AOL.com |
| Comments: | I agree with you, Carl. I've found nothing, anywhere - it's almost like it isn't happening. I so hope that this time, the truth will set him free. |
| Name: | Carl |
| Comments: | Scott, is there any chance you could give us a brief outline of the defence case for Barry George. The media blackout has made it somewhat difficult to follow. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Thanks Pat. I'll reply to your email. I'm absolutely not the type of person who would stay away from a case on the basis that it involves travellers. I am exactly the type of man who will campaign for anyone, irrespective of race, colour, creed, socio economic, disability or indeed any other factor. I campaign for anyone who is INNOCENT. The truth and justice are what I care about. |
| Name: | Pat |
| E-mail address: | fightforchris@btinternet.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.justice4chrisnudds.co.uk |
| Comments: | Your books make brilliant reading. The amount of work and detail you put into them leave no room for doubt. It would be interesting to see what you made of the above case. However, without appearing to be rude to you, maybe because it involves travellers, you, like many others who have offered to help may well choose to shy away from it. Before you do, try to read Eamon Dillon's book, THE OUTSIDERS, the secret world of Irish Travellers. It may open your eyes and that of anyone else who reads it and allow you a small glimpse of how travellers actually behave. |
| Name: | Fiz |
| E-mail address: | FROrrBunt@AOL.com |
| Comments: | Fingers crossed and much more for Barry George, and Bradley Murdoch. I feel these are real miscarriages of justice and I long to see them both exonerated. |
| Name: | David Jagger |
| E-mail address: | dajagger@tiscali.co.uk |
| Comments: | I have just found your website and look forward to reading your book about the Falconio case. For many years I have had grave misgivings about how this whole affair has been conducted and particularly Joanne Lees version of events. Bradley Murdoch may very well be a thug and a criminal but he is no murderer. |
| Name: | Mike |
| Comments: | In reply to Christie wannabee I can guess what he would like to be. But facts are facts and abuse wont change that. Jill Dando's killer will be laughing if Barry is reconvicted and so will wannabees like Christy. |
| Name: | pat |
| E-mail address: | fightforchris@btinternet.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.justice4chrisnudds.co.uk |
| Comments: | Having just come across your website and details of your book i cannot wait to get hold of a copy and read it.
I'm working on a miscarriage of justice case at the moment and as with most, it is very complicated and it is very hard work. We must keep fighting these cases until the justice system can put its own house in order. |
| Name: | Scotty |
| E-mail address: | iangladian@dodo.com.au |
| Comments: | I have finally found someone that supports my theory that Bradley Murdoch may not have murdered Falconio in Australia. The scant evidence should never have been given to police in the UK, the case was not one that even involved them. Their involvement should have been aimed at Falconio before he left England to come here, and the same goes for Lees. Her whole story was an ever changing series of fibs. Both were drug abusers, and therefore out of touch with reality, so why should I believe her? |
| Name: | Mike |
| Comments: | Good to see that DNA evidence is under scrutiny at last. Bradley Murdoch may be innocent after all. And why was none of Barry George's DNA found either on Jill Dando or her gate which the killer pulled shut? |
| Name: | keijo |
| E-mail address: | keijoleppioja@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | "Love must be sincere.hate what is evil; cling to what is good."And how we can w´find more of goodness in our time?Yes by obey God´s word and do what he will,for his will are only of goodness and love,win and win the lost to him in Christ,pray for blessed revival soon,thanks and bless and hope,keijo sweden |
| Name: | Zigmaster |
| E-mail address: | ziggy-allen@blueyonder.co.uk |
| Comments: | I would even not go as far as to the point as to say corruption is rife, but to put something into place like they did against Barry in the events that lead upto the case coming to court.
I can't see how another bout of hundreds of thousands of public funds can be used and justified as being used wisely. The best thing to do and wouldn't cost as much, give Barry £350.000 for his trouble & let him go now. Why is he not free now.... I predict....Barry will be released soon with no further action.. Ziggy |
| Name: | joan |
| E-mail address: | joan.barnett-lee@hotmail.co.uk |
| Comments: | Since the beginning i have douted that barry george killed jill dando.I myself have a son whos in prison for a murder i dont think he commited,he has said hes guilty tho so there seems to be nothing i can do about it.The evidence is as weak as barry georges tho |
| Name: | bill |
| E-mail address: | bill.webber@ntlworld.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.andoverhydroponics.biz |
| Comments: | Corruption is rife in this country. It is great you are high lighting these cases. Please keep up the good work your site is well worth a visit thanks Bill |
| Name: | Donna |
| E-mail address: | mommachoo@btinternet.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.kevinnunn.webeden.co.uk |
| Comments: | I am a 44 year old woman who was brought up to believe in the judicial system of Great Britain. I believed that if you are law abiding and work hard you get on in life and nothing 'bad' happens to you.
I also worked in the judicial system for 7 years as a Criminal Justice liaison nurse. In February 2005 my brother's girlfriend was found dead, she was half naked, burnt, and sexually assaulted, on a public footpath along side a river. In March 2005 my brother was arrested and charged with murder. In November 2006 he was found guilty of her murder. There was NO forensic evidence to link my brother to this horrendous crime. Sperm was found on her body yet my brother had a vasectomy in early 90s and was proved to be sterile! The prosecution sent a DNA sample to the FSS DURING the trial of a suspect they never arrested or brought in for questioning. We do not have the result! This information was found in the unused material. This suspect also bragged of being able to carry out the 'perfect murder' months before she was found dead and spoke of details no one knew until weeks AFTER the murder! He has a history of violence and sexual deviance. Yet he was not arrested or charged with the murder. He lied in all his statements and lied on oath. My brother had never been in trouble with the law apart from the odd speeding fine. He worked hard and told the truth. He DID NOT kill his girlfriend. The evidence of this is overwhelming yet 12 people found him guilty and he was sentenced along with me and my family to 22 years imprisonment. Iresigned from my post as a criminal justice liaison nurse.I could no longer walk into court and believe in the system. Courts are a circus, a gamble on who represent you, who the jury is, which Barrister tell the better story, which jury member stays awake, who reads the papers, which are biased for the CPS, during the trial that influences your thoughts. I now fight to clear my brothers name, my families name, for a girl who was robbed of justice and to put the rightful man behind bars. Website as above but new website coming soon. www.justice4kevinnunn.co.uk I am glad there is someone else who is also campaigning for justice and to highlight the need for change in our Judicial System and most of all, policing in Great Britain. Regards Donna |
| Name: | Davet Jones |
| E-mail address: | daveyjones@aol.com |
| Comments: | Very good site, i was wondering what your thoughts are on the case of the Rettenden Triple Murders and weather you believe the two men Jack Whomes and Michael Steele were wrongy convicted? or do you think their supporters are or have found legal technacalitys to hope to get them released very soon? |
| Name: | Claire Elkins |
| E-mail address: | quackingclaire@aol.com |
| Comments: | Excellent website you got. Good books you have written there. Must get round to reading them sometime.
Claire |
| Name: | Mike. |
| Comments: | Murdoch. Like the Dingo is innocent story. He may not be a nice bloke but there is something very odd about that case.
Then again they say HRH Diana was the victim of a simple RTA but do we believe that? And was Jill Dando killed by an obsessive deranged fan? |
| Name: | B |
| E-mail address: | blueyoda15@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | This is posted on the day of Murdoch's appeal going to court: I found your article on the Falconio disappearence interesting to say the least. I am a resident of Darwin, Australia, and am a strong believer of innocence until 'proven' guilty, and I think the biggest judicial mistake in all of this is, as you too state, there is no body - there's definately something fishy somewhere... as with the much-publicised case of Lindy Chamberlain 20-something years ago, in which Lindy was acquitted many years later... I will buy your book the day it hits the shelf... |
| Name: | eileen |
| E-mail address: | eileenmaryc@yahoo.co.uk |
| Comments: | your article on barry george is compelling by far. how the prosecution can still maintain that the conviction was safe is beyond me? to part way restore my faith in the british justice system, barry's conviction must be quashed without further delay! |
| Name: | eileen |
| E-mail address: | eileenmaryc@yahoo.co.uk |
| Comments: | i have read your article regarding barry george,having been concerned about his wrongfull conviction for some years. it is the most compelling account i have read, which clearly points out that he is innoncent of this crime. it is a thorough, excellent piece of work! |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Thanks Louise. It's nice of you to say those things. Anyone wanting to visit the site for Jamie Dunn (convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence - there are weaknesses in the case) go to: http://jdsfight4freedom.webeden.co.uk |
| Name: | Louise |
| E-mail address: | louezedunn@btinternet.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://jdsfight4freedom |
| Comments: | WOW Scott,
This site is supurb, I trust that what you right is the way it is. Your doing a wounderful job you have got an amazing talent and its lovely to see it's not going to waste. People like you make all the difference Scott, its people like you that gives hope in such cases. *** YOUR A TRUE STAR *** Take care of yourself Scott.xxxx ;o) |
| Name: | LRC |
| Comments: | Your information on the Carine case is rubbish. Luziac was not wanted at the time of the smuggling for drug trafficking. Neither did 'they show he had tried to obtain nuclear weapons'. There case is very different from the CA case you quote. These two men knew full well what they were doing. Does it not seem odd to you that two experienced pilots thought they were workking for Air America 12 years after the film of the same name. Further their ID cards were issued 'supposedly' at the airbase in Saigon used by the Americans during the Vietnam war. Two experienced pilots would know this is ridiculous. It was designed to fool the uniformed, not them. - [Note from S. C. Lomax: There is indeed a real organisation within the CIA called Air America. That's a fact and is not disputed. There is currently a man in an American prison who was involved in the Carine case, who tricked Carine into being involved on the flight, who has sworn an affivdavit in which he gives an account that adds credibility to Carine's case] |
| Name: | keijo |
| E-mail address: | keijoleppioja@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | "Turm my heart toward your statuses and not toward selfihs gain."God is good and he will that we will be ful of wisdom and his mind and love again today with Christ,let us walk and take steps with joy and hope,and knowing that our ways is going to heaven one time.Help that many may find this way and be save and be healed,pray for blessed revival soon.Thanks and bles.keijo sweden |
| Name: | Michelle O'Brien |
| E-mail address: | lacristwen.obrien@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | Thank you for the section for aspiring writers. I am currently in the process of looking for an agent ifyou have any ideas, I will gladly think them over!! I love the site, it was all very interesting. |
| Name: | Mike |
| Comments: | So Michael Stone might get another chance following appeal court ruling on Dr Heath. It just shows, 'experts' can be wrong and must be challenged at every opportunity. |
| Name: | maureen stubbs |
| E-mail address: | mstubbs7@aol.com |
| Comments: | well done very good job proud of you enjoyed reading it all |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Just to remind people, this is not a message board. It is a guestbook. Only post messages about the website in here or about my writing in general. If you want to discuss cases use my message board - www.sclomax.co.uk/invboard
And for the record, the place where the 'abduction' of Peter Falconio occured is not an area travelled on by 'large' numbers of vehicles in night and day. Joanne Lees was there two or more hours before one vehicle came along and the police said at the time she was incredibly lucky to have had one vehicle travel along that road on that night (the one vehicle whose driver found her). |
| Name: | anemaric |
| E-mail address: | austral_athletico@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | In your synopsis of the Falconio disappearance you made some mistakes. The road from Alice to Darwin on which the incident took place is the main bitumen highway between the two cities. It is frequented by large numbers of lorries and cars at all hours of night and day. It is not a case of one or two cars a day as you state. Lees claims the assailant was in a vehicle behind them and must have persuaded Falconio to stop, (and here I am making an assumption) by flashing headlights or pulling up alongside the Kombi. A newspaper stated, that Lees slid over to the drivers side of the VW, apparently to rev the motor as Falconio went back to inspect. Whether the engine backfired or a gun fired. Who knows? If you were bending down at the back of a Kombi inspecting the engine, and it back fired what would happen? Could something happen that caused you to bleed?
You mention the bleeding of the assailant producing DNA which was produced 2 years after the incident. No, the sloughing of skin produced the DNA, according to the forensic boffins. The head of forensics(Dr. Thatcher) had his DNA on the manacles, and when asked how this could have happened, as he was never supposed to have touched them, he replied."I don't know." This was the same answer Murdoch gave when he was asked how his DNA got into the VW. Thatcher said that he may have breathed on the manacles. So, every time we breathe we are spreading DNA. I did not know that. Is that true? Just like the Guildford 4 and the Birmingham 6, the police appear to be complicit in stitiching Murdoch up. (Who incidentally does himself no good by looking like he was sent from Hollywood casting for the role of drug running,gun toting, murdering, gentleman. But that's life!) When he was held in Yatala, the SA prison, a NT cop went to visit him (SANDRY) with a brown paper bag with the manacles in them. Later Sandry denied that he had the manacles, but when the police log showed he had signed for them, his memory cleared up. The brown paper bag was either rolled shut, or stapled shut, depending on which cop was telling the story. Sandry showed another cop the contents of the bag, (as one would) so both contaminated the manacles by breathing on them. The manacles were taken to Yatala, but not shown to Murdoch, according to the police. Why then, would they have taken the manacles from NT to SA if not to ask Murdoch to identify them. He would have said."No I've never seen them in my life." But if he handled them, then and there, his DNA would be on them. The Kombi was dusted for prints, and Murdochs were not found. Rubber gloves were found amongst Murdoch's possessions, but did he wear them? Sloughing of skin would have possibly have then come from other parts of his body, such as arms. Finally, Lees was thrown into the series 75 Toyota 4WD utitlity, with a canvas bag over her head which promptly came off. She saw the heeler dog. His dog, of course, is a dalmatian cross, or purebred dalmatian, depending on which journalist you read. She pulled her hand-cuffs, the plastic manacles to the front of her body, then slid between the two front bucket seats to the rear tray. I have never seen a vehicle such as this with access to the rear tray, nor is there any room for a person to slither between the seats. In version number two, she did the manacles to the front act, whilst on the rear tray, and in version number three, dropped over the gate, and THEN pulled her hands to the front. Author Robin Bowles who has published a book on this disappearance, allowed herself to be tied up and ran off into the bush, in a controlled experiment, to see if she could be 40 yards from the road, and remain hidden for 5 hours. (you said 2 hours) I say, how would she know? She was terrified, disoriented, stoned, injured, and the outback does play its tricks. Bowles was found in five minutes. Just imagine if you were running of into spinifex, bare legged, and threw yourself down, and rolled up in a ball,and then you heard footsteps coming closer and closer. It would be hard to imagine you could avoid detection, if the armed gunman, was an experienced bushman, had a dog with him, and was wearing NIGHT VISION GOGGLES, which is what Murdoch had. Therefore, one can assume the hunter was not Murdoch. Some reports state that he also had a torch. It was a moonless night, so the torch with night vision goggles would have made the surrounding terrain look like broad daylight. The DNA test initially done in this cas was conducted by Joy Kuhl. Back many years ago a dingo took a baby in the Northern Territory, and when the mother's car was found the sound deadening compound or chemical which is sprayed around the steering column of all these makes of cars (General Motors) was mistaken for foetal blood. The mother, Lindy Chamberlain, was gaoled for this mistake. The forensic scientist who made the mistake was Joy Kuhl. I am suprised she still kept her job. But, hey what would I know? |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Before commenting on my work please have the courtesy to actually read it. If you read my article on the case of Glyn razzell you will see that I have never said he is innocent. I merely think there are doubts, which is pretty obvious if you study the facts. Glyn's children bombardded their missing mother's mobile phone with text messages shortly after she disappeared. One of the texts said words to the effect of "it's ok if you don't come back, we will understand." Why would they say that if they weren't of the opinion that she might not be coming back? She had marked the day she was "abducted" on her calendar, with a question mark. Why? She had withdrawn a large sum of money from her bank account the day before she disappeared and had searched the Internet for cheap flights abroad. Why? Her mobile phone was moved to the scene of the alleged abduction when Glyn Razzell's whereabouts are known. It looks like someone staged the abduction. Linda was even seen after the "abduction" by one of her friends and other people have since seen her. So is she dead or is she still around? I'm not saying he certainly is innocent but clearly there are doubts. |
| Name: | talia |
| E-mail address: | 08simmonsf@camshill.com |
| Comments: | how dare you think there is no evidence towards glyn being the killer? he attacked my cousins and my auntie! my cousins have been there, and been attacked by this rightfully impisoned man. he shoved my auntie through a glass door! they were just about to get divorced, then my auntie dissapeared. they found her blood in his friend's car (which he was borrowing) what more evidence do you need? 25 years imprisoned will not bring my auntie back. :( |
| Name: | mike bourke |
| Comments: | The dirty tricks have begun again. With a decision due soon from the CCRC I read that Barry George may be sent to Broadmoor with the likes of Ian Huntley and Roy Whiting. Barry is no child killer and it is sick that the media would seek to link him to low life. Unlike the others, there is no credible evidence to link Barry to the crime scene of Jill Dando's assassination. Yes, assassination. Shame on the dirty tricks department for trying to. Just as in HRH Princess Dianas death, Jill Dando's death has the smell of a cover up. Why? |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Comments: | This is not designed to be a message board. I appreciate all comments but I do actually have a forum where people can discuss my work and various cases, including the Bradley Murdoch case. The forum can be found at www.sclomax.co.uk/invboard
Thanks. |
| Name: | gary |
| Comments: | Mike, you are right, it was a puzzler.
You know some of his crime history, compared to Lees's, who hasn't even a speeding fine. I find it puzzling why anyone would still think he was "probably innocent" as opposed to "probably guilty", after 8 weeks of evidence was heard, they were advised that if they had a shadow of doubt he may be innocent they should find him not guilty, and all 12 found him guilty. What are your main reasons for believing he is innocent and has been framed? |
| Name: | gary |
| E-mail address: | garythackeray@ hotmail.com |
| Comments: | thousands upon thousands of wrongful verdicts are made in courts each day. My mother was, for the last 5 years of her working life, an usher in a court. She escorted countless people who were guilty of the crimes, out as free people(they admitted to her they were guilty, in their joy!)
The justice systems stink in the UK and elsewhere. If countries were really interested in the truth, there are methods of obtaining it these days 100 times more accurate than a jury. However, we choose an archaic inaccurate system that in most cases bends over backwards to help the criminals, the lawyers, and everyone else involved in crime earn a good living from the doubts uncovered in investigations. |
| Name: | Mike Northcliffe |
| Comments: | Gary
It is a puzzler. Murdoch was/is a bad fellow who peddled dope. But have you ever heard of such a thing as the police fitting an unsolved high profile crime to a bad fellow so as to clear their books? Murdoc is no loss from the outback, but he is probably innocent of the crime for which he is convicted, as are many other convicts. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | I suggest those who have recently written comments about the Falconio/Murdoch case actually take the time to read my comments. Yes, Lees was able to re-enact getting her hands from behind her back, to her front, BUT she has publicly admitted she practiced doing this task after Falconio's disappearance (source - the Martin Bashir interview). |
| Name: | gary |
| E-mail address: | garythackeray@hotmail.com |
| Comments: | There were many inconsistencies in this case, but far more for me from Murdoch. How he managed to travel 2000kms+ towing a trailer that no-one saw, the unusual silver gun that 4 people saw,(one a complete stranger) that he denied having, how his dna got on the inside of the tape and in her van. The biggest mystery of all was how his blood got on her t-shirt, and the results from this blood test were recieved 9 months before he was a suspect for this crime? How could the police get it and frame him without murdoch knowing his blood was taken? Why was he so reluctant to have his dna taken in prison, when he had nothing to do with this crime?
Another mystery was Falconio's sighting a week later. Neither person knew Falconio or had seen him in real life, only from a copy of a copy in a newspaper. Her story? she served him a mars and coke, and when he left she went to tell he colleague out back. His story? he sold him a coke and mars bar too??? How can 2 people get such a simple event so mixed up? No ID of the man he was with, no vehicle ID or reg no, no proof at all. Someone who is being held hostage, or fakes their own death, when half of the Aus police force is looking for him does not walk into a garage for a few lousy items, and risk blowing his cover, it makes absolutely no sense at all. The big "mystery" of the unusual cable ties, how they got from back to front took me 1 minute to re-enact, big deal! and not worthy of a mention in court. Either Murdoch knows where the body is, or he doesn't. There are methods to extract the truth nowadays, he should be forced to take the truth drug and reveal where the body is, and the gun. If he doesnt know he should walk free. Illegal? no excuse, change the law and back date it. I believed he was 100% guilty 6 weeks ago, so was not suprised the jury thought the same. They dismissed Lees's inconsistencies as understandable for the circumstances, and dismissed the defence's story as plain rubbish. I hope he is found guilty of the other murders they are looking into, to see if there are more dna links, as other families need closures too |
| Name: | Emma S |
| Comments: | Fantastic site! I've been reading up on the Falconio case and believe 100% that Murdoch is innocent. My theory is that Lees & Falconio faked his death to get half of the insurance money each. He'd go his own way and she'd be able to start a new life with her lover "Nick"..there is no way that woman is as innocent as she makes out.... |
| Name: | Alan |
| E-mail address: | asandy391@btinternet.com |
| Comments: | I think there is something fishy about falconios girlfriend, i do not trust her and thought murdoch would get off with it, things dont seem to add up. |
| Name: | Caroline |
| Comments: | Just received your e-mail. It's very sad to hear that you will not be writing for a while. There are not enough people like you to help those who are clearly innocent. I hope you will not stay away too long. All the very best and keep us updated. |
| Name: | mike |
| E-mail address: | mikebusman@eircom.net |
| Comments: | Reminds me of 'The Dingo is Innocent'. The arsenal of weapons and shovels found in Bradley's van is disturbing as was Ms Lees behaviour in the aftermath of Falconi's dissaperance. Picnic at Hanging Rock also comes to mind. Weird case.
Mike. |
| Name: | antipodean |
| Comments: | Please keep up with the court case. Joanne Less demonstrated in court that she could bring her handcuffed hands from the back to the front within seconds. As a fairly flexible woman myself, I could do it too.
Please keep objective and scientific, and keep in mind the following: Lees was stoned when it happened, and this may explain inconsistencies in her account; Murdoch fits the identikit, which was drawn from her description long before he was caught; Falconio's blood was found on the road (DNA proven). There are two scenarios, both of which fit the evidence to the same extent. One includes James Hepe lying to get out of his drugs charge, and Murdoch's ex-girlfriend lying for no apparent reason, and Lees and perhaps Falconio choosing Murdoch beforehand, and formulating a description from that before she/they performed some sort of fraud, and then either evidence was planted, or there were lab stuff-ups. The other is that all is as it seems. Unfortunately it will take great knowledge of forensic science to work out what has happened. I suggest if you are going to write a book, you contact Emeritus Professor Barry Boettcher, who help exhonerate Lindy Chamberlain, and who will have followed the case. |
| Name: | Bill |
| E-mail address: | whatsthatallabout@fastmail.fm |
| Comments: | Hi!
Great site, I found it only when I was searching for more information on the Bradley Murdoch case. Why have we not heard anything from his side and why are there so many inconsistencies in the evidence given. I hope the truth of this case comes out. Whatever that may be. Bill (ex NSW – Now living in London) |
| Name: | Peggy |
| Comments: | An absolutely incredible website - long may it reign to help the great number of miscarriages of justice that occur each year in the 'British' Justice' system.
God bless you Scott Peggy |
| Name: | Joluma |
| E-mail address: | joluma@bellsouth.net |
| Comments: | Hi Scott,
Extremely interesting site you have here. I am eagerly looking forward to your investigation of the Steven Jones case. |
| Name: | Mike. |
| Comments: | I agree with the previous comments. It is far too easy under the British Justice system to convict.
A case in point is a recent murder conviction where the Irish Justice minister allowed a murder case to go ahead in the UK rather than in Eire, as there was a better chance of conviction in the UK. The accused was convicted, and in my opinion the verdict was probably correct. Nevertheless, the test in the UK would seem to be lower than in other countries. |
| Name: | Thomas Leitch Green |
| E-mail address: | thomas.green3@btinternet.com |
| Comments: | I have written to the Scottish Excuse for the Justice Minister (Cathy Jamieson ) I suggested that in the terms of EQUALITY, That any Police man or person caught, (in the process of any criminal proceedings) fabricating evidence or committing perjury, should be given the punishment that the accused person faces if convicted.
I believe this is one way of eradicating corruption in the Police Forces. There is no Justice in a corrupt Society. Thomas Leitch Green. ( Why not attempt to have a bill initiated in order to change the law ) |
| Name: | Mike |
| E-mail address: | mikebourke2@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.barrygeorge.com |
| Comments: | If anyone is still interested in the Jill Dando murder investigation I suggest they get a copy of Master DETECTIVE magazine from October 1999. The report on the Dando murder investigation reinforces the belief that Barry George was, to put it crudely, 'Stitched Up' for the assassination of Jill Dando.
Maguire seven, Birmingham Six, Guildford four, Bridgewater three, Cardiff three, Fulham one, and still the injustices go on. |
| Name: | Sophie |
| Comments: | Hi Scott,
I just had a quick look through your website and i just want to say that it's an incredible website you should be so proud. Keep up the good work, your doing an amazing job. Sophie xx |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| Comments: | Thanks for the messages. I'm away at the moment but will respond to them and fix your typing errors when I return. |
| Name: | matt. |
| Comments: | Which terrorists does the previous refer to? Are they the ones who shoot to kill people in trains without warning?
Or the ones who resist the illegal occupation of Iraq? Terrorist is such a widespread description. But we all condem the suicide bombers, and rightly so. |
| Name: | Teraisa J. Rogers |
| E-mail address: | Editor@ TrueCrimeFanatic.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.TrueCrimeFanatic.com |
| Comments: | Scott, what a wonderful job you are doing on your website and for all of humanity. If all young people had only the smallest percent of your heart, the world would thrive.
Keep doing what you are, don't worry about the resistant--people want things too easily. But... don't forget about yourself in the process. I know you would never accept money from me, so I won't be giving you a million dollars for yourself to continue researching your projects and life's injustices withoug any financial problems to deal with. But I would. :-) Take care of yourself and stay away from the terrorists. In fact, you may want to lay low right now, it's not like you choose cases that are not subjects of NATIONAL TELEVISION! Best wishes always and forever, Teraisa |
| Name: | mike |
| E-mail address: | justiceforbarry@eircom.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.barrygeorge.com |
| Comments: | It is interesting that the Dando killing is again in the spotlight. I would like to point out that there is no suggestion from the JfB campaign that Lord Archer or anyone close to him hired a hit-man or wished any harm to any person.
In fact we are grateful that Lord Archer was fair in his account of his sighting of Barry George, and his recounting of conversations with prison officers and 'Lifer's' in HMP Belmarsh. Our concern is the issue of Non Disclosure of evidence. We hope that some day there will be justice for all. Mike. JfB. |
| Name: | Adam Walsh |
| E-mail address: | adam_walsh@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.adam-walsh.com |
| Comments: | very interesting site, ive also been interested in this field and have begun many correspondences with many notorious prisoners both in the UK and USA to try and better understand the reasons and motivations behind those that murder.
good luck with it all. adam. |
| Name: | Keith Hyatt |
| E-mail address: | keith.hyatt@jutice-for-barri-white-and-keith-hyatt.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.justice-for-barri-white-and-keith-hyatt.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hi Scott
A very informative website i've not finished reading it all yet. Like many you write about I too am a victim of a micarriage of justice. Our case was shown in a recent BBC programme "Murder without a Trace" produced by the Rough Justice team. Before I was charged I had had no previous experience of our legal system, and naively thought it was the best. Stupidly thought only guilty people went to prison. Like you said in an earlier comment I.m not looking for a some technicality to get us off but to show we are innocent. I'm desperatly trying to bring to attention the appalling state of our forensic science industry and how so called expert witnesses are the biggest cause for miscarriage of justice. They are totally unregistered making it possible for anyone to become a forensic scientist without any qualifications. I'm hoping you might look at our case, and would appreciate any comments you may make. Keep up the good work Keith Hyatt |
| Name: | Paul Williams |
| E-mail address: | Enquiry@murderfiles.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.murderfiles.com |
| Comments: | Hi Scott
Congratulations on a superb website. The fact that so many people who have legally been found guilty in a court of law might be innocent is truely frighting but I am sure it happens. There are many reasons for this: the only available evidence at the time, someone saying what they thought they saw or heared as opposed to what actually happened, a corrupt police officer only interested in clearing up the crime regardless of who gets put away, lost or rather deliberately mislaid papers, etc. The list is endless. Thankfully there are writers like you who question and keep questionning to find the truth. Keep up this important work. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax@sclomax.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | In response to an earlier posting, I don't particularly care about the legally innocent. If you committed a crime but claim to be the victim of a miscarriage of justice because of some legal technicality in my opinion you do not deserve an appeal. There are so many people fighting to clear their names yet the authorities are having their time wasted by peopel who claim to have been convicted because of some little error. If Peter Sutcliffe had been committed for trial, with his indictment ever so slightly out of date, he would technically be a victim of a miscarriage of justice but that wouldn't have made him any less of a murderer.
I only help those who are totally innocent, in that they have not committed the crime for which they were convicted. I also, of course, campaign for tougher sentences for criminals such as murderers and paedophiles. As far as I am conerned life should mean life. I'm against the death penalty but I believe if you take someone's life then you should have life long incarceration. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax@sclomax.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | It always amazes me how much secrecy there is surrounding the jury in a British criminal case whereas in the USA there are no restriction on jurors discussing their cases with the media. It would be fascinating to see what the jury in the Barry George case thought about each piece of evidence, to see what it was that convinced them of his guilt because as I see it there was absolutely nothing to suggest he was probably guilty, let alone he was guilty 'beyond reasonable doubt.'
Anyone who has concerns about the Barry George conviction please write to your MP and call for a full inquiry into the investigation. Justice demands the case be fully investigated. At present there are still many unanswered questions. |
| Name: | Mike Bourke |
| E-mail address: | mikebourke2@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.barrygeorge.com |
| Comments: | How refreshing to see that the jury in the Michael Jackson trial were allowed to give a press conference and explain their reasons.
What a pity the jury in Barry Georges trial were not allowed the same opportunity. The Justice for Barry campaign is now asking the Home Secretary to hold an inquiry into the overall Jill Dando murder investigation. |
| Name: | Cyril Thomas |
| E-mail address: | cyrillic1@gmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.criminologyonline.com |
| Comments: | Hey Scott,
Greetings from India. Great site buddy for a great author. Best wishes and good luck. Cyril |
| Name: | neil robinson |
| E-mail address: | neil857@msn.com |
| Comments: | Dear Mr Lomax,
I would like to say I think your article about the case involving Simon Hall was outstanding, it totally exposes the rotton to the core justice system that operates in this country, a system that sent an INNOCENT man to prison for a crime he did NOT commit, convicted solely on the evidence of a discredited pathologist, lets hope Simon will be free soon and those responsible for putting him where he is today hang their heads in total shame, judge Rafferty included. Kind Regards. Neil Robinson. |
| Name: | Christopher M. MacNeil |
| E-mail address: | cmmacneil@verizon.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://dsl.verizon.net |
| Comments: | Mr. Lomax and his advocacy for the factually and legally innocent are an important contribution to the movement involving some of us to support the truly innocent who have been convicted and to reform the U.S. and international judicial and sentencing components of the overall criminal justice system, with the goal to restore justice to the system. |
| Name: | Lorraine |
| Comments: | Wish you every success with your future :) |
| Name: | Aunty Pat |
| Comments: | ello munchkin ur mummy told me bout ur site its g8 keep up da gd work! |
| Name: | James Harry Reyos |
| E-mail address: | jhreyos@yahoo.com |
| Comments: | For anyone who has read about Scott C. Lomax ought to be truly happy that he has taken a great interest in the criminal justice system, writing on the flaws of it, exposing the injustices that happen, exposing the cases of miscarriages of justice. Thank you, Scott, for your interest and assistance in my own wrongful conviction case in the United States of America. Yes, wrongful convictions are worldwide -- something that I only thought happened in my country, the U.S. No system of justice is "perfect," however, when a mistake happens, immediate action should be taken to correct that mistake, instead of letting the mistake (wrongful conviction) on and on and on. I truly respect Scott C. Lomax for having the grit to delve into cases of injustices, and to expose them. Keep up the good work, Scott! Thank you for being a voice to those who are wronged by the justice system. "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." --Martin Luther King. Again, my thanks to you, Scott. Best wishes! James (USA). |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax@sclomax.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | In response to some of the earlier posts, I have added some details relating to the jailing of Amy Williams' killer to my 'Crime in the News' section. When possible I try to add as many news pieces relating to crime, on my website, as I can. |
| Name: | Mike |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.barrygeorge.com |
| Comments: | The killer of Amy pleaded guilty and is now serving life with a tarriff of 30 years. |
| Name: | Stephanie |
| E-mail address: | justice4simon@koncept07.net |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.justice4simon.co.uk |
| Comments: | Hi Scott,
Just wanted to say THANK YOU for all your help and constent support and that your site looks great too! Keep up the good work and I wish you lots of luck for the future. Thanx Steph :) |
| Name: | lorraine |
| E-mail address: | lolandmark@msn.com |
| Comments: | is there any more news due on the muderer of pregnant teenager Amy williams? |
| Name: | Mike |
| E-mail address: | mikenightowls@eircom.net |
| Comments: | Excellent news that Susan May is to be released at last. |
| Name: | Sharon Kilby |
| E-mail address: | sharon@kilby18.freeserve.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://sharonkilby.co.uk/ |
| Comments: | Scott Lomax has courage, capability, integrity, intelligence, maturity and wisdom far beyond his years. His excellent investigatory work is thorough and well organised. He is one of a rare breed who actually CARES about victims of injustice, such that he does whatever it takes to expose the TRUTH and bring the real perpetrators of evil to JUSTICE. In the doing he regularly suffers abuse and intimidation - getting threatening emails, such that he suffers the real risk of serious harm - even death.
Thank goodness we have people like Scott in this world - people who are unafraid to probe, question, analyse... and EXPOSE the real criminals. I believe he is truly one of God's little helpers. Wish there were more like him around. I too am a campaigner against injustice and corruption. Please take a look at my site. Readers must not be under the illusion that just because a police investigation clears someone, that that person is not guilty OR that when a person is convicted in court of a crime, then he/she must therefore be guilty. Quite often nothing could be further from the truth. My site exposes corruption in North Wales and it questions the role of freemasonry and its influence in the Authorities and Courts. |
| Name: | Miheal De Burca |
| Comments: | At 06.00 on Tuesday July 30th 2002 on GMTV an allegation was made that a policeman in charge of the Jill Dando murder investigation lied in court.
The allegation was not repeated, but I have never heard that the policeman denied it. I do not know what the lie was supposed to be and can only assume the allegation was false. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax@sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Thank you for your message Caroline. You did not include your email address so i can't contact you privately.
I am pleased you like the website and hope you will return in the future. I find the Susan May case very worrying - there is not a shred of evidence against ehr and yet she is still in prison. Regarding Michael Stone, a number of people have contacted me saying that I should look into his case. I will do soon. I followed his appeal and was amazed how quickly the judges gave their judgment. It was less than a day. Having said that I think they made the right decision, at least the right decision within the rules they work within. I do not know enough about the case to say whether Stone is innocent or guilty (though there is no real evidence showing his guilt). However, I do not believe that the defence produced enough evidence to show the key witness at the retrial (who Stone allegedly confessed to) was lying. It is hard to prove someone lied. The Court of Appeal respects the views of a jury and so if a jury listened to a witness and believed they were telling the truth, appeal judges can do little about it unless compelling evidence is produced. I don't think the judges had much choice but to dismiss the appeal because of the lack of evidence put forward by the defence. Whetehr Stone is innocent or not, is another matter. The Court of Appeal needs to be reformed. Judges have to work within rules that frequently make it impossible for justice to be achieved. |
| Name: | Caroline |
| Comments: | A brilliant and informative website which I came across via the Simon Hall official website. I have been interested in miscarriages of justice since I read Paul Foots brilliant book on the Carl Bridgewater 4 and have followed many of the cases on your site ie Derek Christian, Simon Hall, Susan May. Have you ever investigated the Michael Stone case? I would be interested on your opinion of that case because I am not convinced he is guilty. Also I have just found www.blindjustice.co.uk. I wondered if you knew of the case and if so, have you any updates to it? Sorry to ramble on but I am so pleased to have found your site!!! Well done and continue the good work. |
| Name: | mike |
| E-mail address: | mikebourke2@hotmail.com |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.barrygeorge.com |
| Comments: | It is apparent that Jill Dando was probably murdered by somebody known to her. Her scream sounded to a witness as like somebody surprising somebody. The killer closed her gate. So he or she was familiar with leaving her premises. Why else in the midst of the perfect crime would he/she close the gate and risk leaving DNA evidence unless it was an action from habit? The killer was probably either medically experienced or had military training,and I am not talking about Dad's Army here.
All the killer then had to do was to keep his/her head down, unlike silly Barry George who went out of his way to attract attention. |
| Name: | Maggie |
| Comments: | This is a very good and well informed website. |
| Name: | S. C. Lomax |
| E-mail address: | sclomax@sclomax.co.uk |
| Homepage URL: | http://www.sclomax.co.uk |
| Comments: | Please feel free to leave a message in my guestbook. Do not post illegal or defamatory material. All such material will be removed. Any information I have about anyone who posts such material will be publicised. Also, do not post your address or telephone number or you will end up having prank phone calls and possibly malicious letters sent through the post. There are a small number of strange people who visit this site. This guestbook is not designed to act as a message board. If there is enough demand for a message board I will create one.
Thank you. Best wishes, S. C. Lomax |