Dreambook for The Official Website of S. C. Lomax

Welcome to my nifty Dreambook, a free guestbook service from New Dream Network and the DreamHost!

If you have a minute, please add your entry to those below by signing my Dreambook!


Name: pat
E-mail address: fightforchris@btinternet.com
Homepage URL: http://www.justice4chrisnudds.co.uk
Comments:Having just come across your website and details of your book i cannot wait to get hold of a copy and read it.
I'm working on a miscarriage of justice case at the moment and as with most, it is very complicated and it is very hard work. We must keep fighting these cases until the justice system can put its own house in order.
Friday, April 11th 2008 - 08:19:02 PM
Name: Scotty
E-mail address: iangladian@dodo.com.au
Comments:I have finally found someone that supports my theory that Bradley Murdoch may not have murdered Falconio in Australia. The scant evidence should never have been given to police in the UK, the case was not one that even involved them. Their involvement should have been aimed at Falconio before he left England to come here, and the same goes for Lees. Her whole story was an ever changing series of fibs. Both were drug abusers, and therefore out of touch with reality, so why should I believe her?
Tuesday, February 26th 2008 - 11:36:11 PM
Name: christie
E-mail address: wannacatchabarra@hotmail.com
Comments:your a tosser mate.
Saturday, January 5th 2008 - 09:15:41 AM
Name: Mike
Comments:Good to see that DNA evidence is under scrutiny at last. Bradley Murdoch may be innocent after all. And why was none of Barry George's DNA found either on Jill Dando or her gate which the killer pulled shut?
Sunday, December 23rd 2007 - 08:04:34 PM
Name: keijo
E-mail address: keijoleppioja@hotmail.com
Comments:"Love must be sincere.hate what is evil; cling to what is good."And how we can w´find more of goodness in our time?Yes by obey God´s word and do what he will,for his will are only of goodness and love,win and win the lost to him in Christ,pray for blessed revival soon,thanks and bless and hope,keijo sweden
Saturday, December 15th 2007 - 01:25:33 PM
Name: us
Comments:u twat!
Thursday, December 6th 2007 - 10:07:56 PM
Name: Zigmaster
E-mail address: ziggy-allen@blueyonder.co.uk
Comments:I would even not go as far as to the point as to say corruption is rife, but to put something into place like they did against Barry in the events that lead upto the case coming to court.
I can't see how another bout of hundreds of thousands of public funds can be used and justified as being used wisely. The best thing to do and wouldn't cost as much, give Barry £350.000 for his trouble & let him go now.

Why is he not free now....
I predict....Barry will be released soon with no further action..

Ziggy
Thursday, November 15th 2007 - 06:47:34 PM
Name: joan
E-mail address: joan.barnett-lee@hotmail.co.uk
Comments:Since the beginning i have douted that barry george killed jill dando.I myself have a son whos in prison for a murder i dont think he commited,he has said hes guilty tho so there seems to be nothing i can do about it.The evidence is as weak as barry georges tho
Saturday, November 10th 2007 - 05:02:24 PM
Name: bill
E-mail address: bill.webber@ntlworld.com
Homepage URL: http://www.andoverhydroponics.biz
Comments:Corruption is rife in this country. It is great you are high lighting these cases. Please keep up the good work your site is well worth a visit thanks Bill
Monday, November 5th 2007 - 01:56:07 AM
Name: Donna
E-mail address: mommachoo@btinternet.com
Homepage URL: http://www.kevinnunn.webeden.co.uk
Comments:I am a 44 year old woman who was brought up to believe in the judicial system of Great Britain. I believed that if you are law abiding and work hard you get on in life and nothing 'bad' happens to you.
I also worked in the judicial system for 7 years as a Criminal Justice liaison nurse.
In February 2005 my brother's girlfriend was found dead, she was half naked, burnt, and sexually assaulted, on a public footpath along side a river.

In March 2005 my brother was arrested and charged with murder. In November 2006 he was found guilty of her murder.

There was NO forensic evidence to link my brother to this horrendous crime.

Sperm was found on her body yet my brother had a vasectomy in early 90s and was proved to be sterile!

The prosecution sent a DNA sample to the FSS DURING the trial of a suspect they never arrested or brought in for questioning. We do not have the result! This information was found in the unused material.

This suspect also bragged of being able to carry out the 'perfect murder' months before she was found dead and spoke of details no one knew until weeks AFTER the murder!

He has a history of violence and sexual deviance. Yet he was not arrested or charged with the murder. He lied in all his statements and lied on oath.

My brother had never been in trouble with the law apart from the odd speeding fine. He worked hard and told the truth. He DID NOT kill his girlfriend. The evidence of this is overwhelming yet 12 people found him guilty and he was sentenced along with me and my family to 22 years imprisonment.

Iresigned from my post as a criminal justice liaison nurse.I could no longer walk into court and believe in the system.

Courts are a circus, a gamble on who represent you, who the jury is, which Barrister tell the better story, which jury member stays awake, who reads the papers, which are biased for the CPS, during the trial that influences your thoughts.

I now fight to clear my brothers name, my families name, for a girl who was robbed of justice and to put the rightful man behind bars.

Website as above but new website coming soon.

www.justice4kevinnunn.co.uk

I am glad there is someone else who is also campaigning for justice and to highlight the need for change in our Judicial System and most of all, policing in Great Britain.

Regards

Donna
Tuesday, September 4th 2007 - 02:37:26 PM
Name: Davet Jones
E-mail address: daveyjones@aol.com
Comments:Very good site, i was wondering what your thoughts are on the case of the Rettenden Triple Murders and weather you believe the two men Jack Whomes and Michael Steele were wrongy convicted? or do you think their supporters are or have found legal technacalitys to hope to get them released very soon?
Sunday, August 12th 2007 - 11:07:37 PM
Name: Claire Elkins
E-mail address: quackingclaire@aol.com
Comments:Excellent website you got. Good books you have written there. Must get round to reading them sometime.

Claire
Sunday, August 5th 2007 - 10:24:59 PM
Name: Mike.
Comments:Murdoch. Like the Dingo is innocent story. He may not be a nice bloke but there is something very odd about that case.
Then again they say HRH Diana was the victim of a simple RTA but do we believe that? And was Jill Dando killed by an obsessive deranged fan?
Friday, December 15th 2006 - 12:07:41 AM
Name: B
E-mail address: blueyoda15@hotmail.com
Comments:This is posted on the day of Murdoch's appeal going to court: I found your article on the Falconio disappearence interesting to say the least. I am a resident of Darwin, Australia, and am a strong believer of innocence until 'proven' guilty, and I think the biggest judicial mistake in all of this is, as you too state, there is no body - there's definately something fishy somewhere... as with the much-publicised case of Lindy Chamberlain 20-something years ago, in which Lindy was acquitted many years later... I will buy your book the day it hits the shelf...
Tuesday, December 12th 2006 - 05:10:30 AM
Name: eileen
E-mail address: eileenmaryc@yahoo.co.uk
Comments:your article on barry george is compelling by far. how the prosecution can still maintain that the conviction was safe is beyond me? to part way restore my faith in the british justice system, barry's conviction must be quashed without further delay!
Tuesday, December 5th 2006 - 11:49:53 AM
Name: eileen
E-mail address: eileenmaryc@yahoo.co.uk
Comments:i have read your article regarding barry george,having been concerned about his wrongfull conviction for some years. it is the most compelling account i have read, which clearly points out that he is innoncent of this crime. it is a thorough, excellent piece of work!
Tuesday, December 5th 2006 - 11:45:04 AM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Homepage URL: http://www.sclomax.co.uk
Comments:Thanks Louise. It's nice of you to say those things. Anyone wanting to visit the site for Jamie Dunn (convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence - there are weaknesses in the case) go to: http://jdsfight4freedom.webeden.co.uk
Saturday, November 4th 2006 - 08:43:43 PM
Name: Louise
E-mail address: louezedunn@btinternet.com
Homepage URL: http://jdsfight4freedom
Comments:WOW Scott,
This site is supurb, I trust that what you right is the way it is.
Your doing a wounderful job you have got an amazing talent and its lovely to see it's not going to waste. People like you make all the difference Scott, its people like you that gives hope in such cases. *** YOUR A TRUE STAR ***
Take care of yourself Scott.xxxx ;o)
Thursday, November 2nd 2006 - 02:53:58 PM
Name: LRC
Comments:Your information on the Carine case is rubbish. Luziac was not wanted at the time of the smuggling for drug trafficking. Neither did 'they show he had tried to obtain nuclear weapons'. There case is very different from the CA case you quote. These two men knew full well what they were doing. Does it not seem odd to you that two experienced pilots thought they were workking for Air America 12 years after the film of the same name. Further their ID cards were issued 'supposedly' at the airbase in Saigon used by the Americans during the Vietnam war. Two experienced pilots would know this is ridiculous. It was designed to fool the uniformed, not them. - [Note from S. C. Lomax: There is indeed a real organisation within the CIA called Air America. That's a fact and is not disputed. There is currently a man in an American prison who was involved in the Carine case, who tricked Carine into being involved on the flight, who has sworn an affivdavit in which he gives an account that adds credibility to Carine's case]
Tuesday, October 10th 2006 - 08:57:18 PM
Name: keijo
E-mail address: keijoleppioja@hotmail.com
Comments:"Turm my heart toward your statuses and not toward selfihs gain."God is good and he will that we will be ful of wisdom and his mind and love again today with Christ,let us walk and take steps with joy and hope,and knowing that our ways is going to heaven one time.Help that many may find this way and be save and be healed,pray for blessed revival soon.Thanks and bles.keijo sweden
Thursday, October 5th 2006 - 05:24:04 PM
Name: Michelle O'Brien
E-mail address: lacristwen.obrien@yahoo.com
Comments:Thank you for the section for aspiring writers. I am currently in the process of looking for an agent ifyou have any ideas, I will gladly think them over!! I love the site, it was all very interesting.
Tuesday, September 26th 2006 - 10:35:39 PM
Name: Mike
Comments:So Michael Stone might get another chance following appeal court ruling on Dr Heath. It just shows, 'experts' can be wrong and must be challenged at every opportunity.
Friday, August 25th 2006 - 08:50:53 PM
Name: maureen stubbs
E-mail address: mstubbs7@aol.com
Comments:well done very good job proud of you enjoyed reading it all
Sunday, June 25th 2006 - 08:53:44 AM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Homepage URL: http://www.sclomax.co.uk
Comments:Just to remind people, this is not a message board. It is a guestbook. Only post messages about the website in here or about my writing in general. If you want to discuss cases use my message board - www.sclomax.co.uk/invboard

And for the record, the place where the 'abduction' of Peter Falconio occured is not an area travelled on by 'large' numbers of vehicles in night and day. Joanne Lees was there two or more hours before one vehicle came along and the police said at the time she was incredibly lucky to have had one vehicle travel along that road on that night (the one vehicle whose driver found her).
Sunday, April 16th 2006 - 04:22:34 PM
Name: anemaric
E-mail address: austral_athletico@hotmail.com
Comments:In your synopsis of the Falconio disappearance you made some mistakes. The road from Alice to Darwin on which the incident took place is the main bitumen highway between the two cities. It is frequented by large numbers of lorries and cars at all hours of night and day. It is not a case of one or two cars a day as you state. Lees claims the assailant was in a vehicle behind them and must have persuaded Falconio to stop, (and here I am making an assumption) by flashing headlights or pulling up alongside the Kombi. A newspaper stated, that Lees slid over to the drivers side of the VW, apparently to rev the motor as Falconio went back to inspect. Whether the engine backfired or a gun fired. Who knows? If you were bending down at the back of a Kombi inspecting the engine, and it back fired what would happen? Could something happen that caused you to bleed?
You mention the bleeding of the assailant producing DNA which was produced 2 years after the incident. No, the sloughing of skin produced the DNA, according to the forensic boffins. The head of forensics(Dr. Thatcher) had his DNA on the manacles, and when asked how this could have happened, as he was never supposed to have touched them, he replied."I don't know." This was the same answer Murdoch gave when he was asked how his DNA got into the VW. Thatcher said that he may have breathed on the manacles. So, every time we breathe we are spreading DNA. I did not know that. Is that true? Just like the Guildford 4 and the Birmingham 6, the police appear to be complicit in stitiching Murdoch up. (Who incidentally does himself no good by looking like he was sent from Hollywood casting for the role of drug running,gun toting, murdering, gentleman. But that's life!) When he was held in Yatala, the SA prison, a NT cop went to visit him (SANDRY) with a brown paper bag with the manacles in them. Later Sandry denied that he had the manacles, but when the police log showed he had signed for them, his memory cleared up. The brown paper bag was either rolled shut, or stapled shut, depending on which cop was telling the story. Sandry showed another cop the contents of the bag, (as one would) so both contaminated the manacles by breathing on them. The manacles were taken to Yatala, but not shown to Murdoch, according to the police. Why then, would they have taken the manacles from NT to SA if not to ask Murdoch to identify them. He would have said."No I've never seen them in my life." But if he handled them, then and there, his DNA would be on them.

The Kombi was dusted for prints, and Murdochs were not found. Rubber gloves were found amongst Murdoch's possessions, but did he wear them? Sloughing of skin would have possibly have then come from other parts of his body, such as arms.

Finally, Lees was thrown into the series 75 Toyota 4WD utitlity, with a canvas bag over her head which promptly came off. She saw the heeler dog. His dog, of course, is a dalmatian cross, or purebred dalmatian, depending on which journalist you read. She pulled her hand-cuffs, the plastic manacles to the front of her body, then slid between the two front bucket seats to the rear tray. I have never seen a vehicle such as this with access to the rear tray, nor is there any room for a person to slither between the seats. In version number two, she did the manacles to the front act, whilst on the rear tray, and in version number three, dropped over the gate, and THEN pulled her hands to the front.
Author Robin Bowles who has published a book on this disappearance, allowed herself to be tied up and ran off into the bush, in a controlled experiment, to see if she could be 40 yards from the road, and remain hidden for 5 hours. (you said 2 hours) I say, how would she know? She was terrified, disoriented, stoned, injured, and the outback does play its tricks. Bowles was found in five minutes.

Just imagine if you were running of into spinifex, bare legged, and threw yourself down, and rolled up in a ball,and then you heard footsteps coming closer and closer. It would be hard to imagine you could avoid detection, if the armed gunman, was an experienced bushman, had a dog with him, and was wearing NIGHT VISION GOGGLES, which is what Murdoch had. Therefore, one can assume the hunter was not Murdoch. Some reports state that he also had a torch. It was a moonless night, so the torch with night vision goggles would have made the surrounding terrain look like broad daylight.

The DNA test initially done in this cas was conducted by Joy Kuhl.
Back many years ago a dingo took a baby in the Northern Territory, and when the mother's car was found the sound deadening compound or chemical which is sprayed around the steering column of all these makes of cars (General Motors) was mistaken for foetal blood. The mother, Lindy Chamberlain, was gaoled for this mistake. The forensic scientist who made the mistake was Joy Kuhl. I am suprised she still kept her job. But, hey what would I know?
Sunday, April 16th 2006 - 03:08:19 PM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Homepage URL: http://www.sclomax.co.uk
Comments:Before commenting on my work please have the courtesy to actually read it. If you read my article on the case of Glyn razzell you will see that I have never said he is innocent. I merely think there are doubts, which is pretty obvious if you study the facts. Glyn's children bombardded their missing mother's mobile phone with text messages shortly after she disappeared. One of the texts said words to the effect of "it's ok if you don't come back, we will understand." Why would they say that if they weren't of the opinion that she might not be coming back? She had marked the day she was "abducted" on her calendar, with a question mark. Why? She had withdrawn a large sum of money from her bank account the day before she disappeared and had searched the Internet for cheap flights abroad. Why? Her mobile phone was moved to the scene of the alleged abduction when Glyn Razzell's whereabouts are known. It looks like someone staged the abduction. Linda was even seen after the "abduction" by one of her friends and other people have since seen her. So is she dead or is she still around? I'm not saying he certainly is innocent but clearly there are doubts.
Tuesday, March 7th 2006 - 06:59:32 PM
Name: talia
E-mail address: 08simmonsf@camshill.com
Comments:how dare you think there is no evidence towards glyn being the killer? he attacked my cousins and my auntie! my cousins have been there, and been attacked by this rightfully impisoned man. he shoved my auntie through a glass door! they were just about to get divorced, then my auntie dissapeared. they found her blood in his friend's car (which he was borrowing) what more evidence do you need? 25 years imprisoned will not bring my auntie back. :(
Tuesday, March 7th 2006 - 04:36:10 PM
Name: mike bourke
Comments:The dirty tricks have begun again. With a decision due soon from the CCRC I read that Barry George may be sent to Broadmoor with the likes of Ian Huntley and Roy Whiting. Barry is no child killer and it is sick that the media would seek to link him to low life. Unlike the others, there is no credible evidence to link Barry to the crime scene of Jill Dando's assassination. Yes, assassination. Shame on the dirty tricks department for trying to. Just as in HRH Princess Dianas death, Jill Dando's death has the smell of a cover up. Why?
Thursday, February 9th 2006 - 12:28:14 AM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Comments:This is not designed to be a message board. I appreciate all comments but I do actually have a forum where people can discuss my work and various cases, including the Bradley Murdoch case. The forum can be found at www.sclomax.co.uk/invboard

Thanks.
Thursday, January 5th 2006 - 10:05:25 PM
Name: gary
Comments:Mike, you are right, it was a puzzler.
You know some of his crime history, compared to Lees's, who hasn't even a speeding fine. I find it puzzling why anyone would still think he was "probably innocent" as opposed to "probably guilty", after 8 weeks of evidence was heard, they were advised that if they had a shadow of doubt he may be innocent they should find him not guilty, and all 12 found him guilty.

What are your main reasons for believing he is innocent and has been framed?





















Wednesday, January 4th 2006 - 10:22:49 PM
Name: gary
E-mail address: garythackeray@ hotmail.com
Comments: thousands upon thousands of wrongful verdicts are made in courts each day. My mother was, for the last 5 years of her working life, an usher in a court. She escorted countless people who were guilty of the crimes, out as free people(they admitted to her they were guilty, in their joy!)
The justice systems stink in the UK and elsewhere.

If countries were really interested in the truth, there are methods of obtaining it these days 100 times more accurate than a jury. However, we choose an archaic inaccurate system that in most cases bends over backwards to help the criminals, the lawyers, and everyone else involved in crime earn a good living from the doubts uncovered in investigations.
Tuesday, January 3rd 2006 - 03:49:00 PM
Name: Mike Northcliffe
Comments:Gary

It is a puzzler. Murdoch was/is a bad fellow who peddled dope. But have you ever heard of such a thing as the police fitting an unsolved high profile crime to a bad fellow so as to clear their books? Murdoc is no loss from the outback, but he is probably innocent of the crime for which he is convicted, as are many other convicts.
Sunday, January 1st 2006 - 02:35:59 AM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Homepage URL: http://www.sclomax.co.uk
Comments:I suggest those who have recently written comments about the Falconio/Murdoch case actually take the time to read my comments. Yes, Lees was able to re-enact getting her hands from behind her back, to her front, BUT she has publicly admitted she practiced doing this task after Falconio's disappearance (source - the Martin Bashir interview).
Saturday, December 31st 2005 - 04:08:37 PM
Name: gary
E-mail address: garythackeray@hotmail.com
Comments: There were many inconsistencies in this case, but far more for me from Murdoch. How he managed to travel 2000kms+ towing a trailer that no-one saw, the unusual silver gun that 4 people saw,(one a complete stranger) that he denied having, how his dna got on the inside of the tape and in her van. The biggest mystery of all was how his blood got on her t-shirt, and the results from this blood test were recieved 9 months before he was a suspect for this crime? How could the police get it and frame him without murdoch knowing his blood was taken? Why was he so reluctant to have his dna taken in prison, when he had nothing to do with this crime?
Another mystery was Falconio's sighting a week later.
Neither person knew Falconio or had seen him in real life, only from a copy of a copy in a newspaper. Her story?
she served him a mars and coke, and when he left she went to tell he colleague out back.
His story? he sold him a coke and mars bar too???
How can 2 people get such a simple event so mixed up?
No ID of the man he was with, no vehicle ID or reg no, no proof at all.
Someone who is being held hostage, or fakes their own death, when half of the Aus police force is looking for him does not walk into a garage for a few lousy items, and risk blowing his cover, it makes absolutely no sense at all.
The big "mystery" of the unusual cable ties, how they got from back to front took me 1 minute to re-enact, big deal! and not worthy of a mention in court.
Either Murdoch knows where the body is, or he doesn't.
There are methods to extract the truth nowadays, he should be forced to take the truth drug and reveal where the body is, and the gun. If he doesnt know he should walk free.
Illegal? no excuse, change the law and back date it.
I believed he was 100% guilty 6 weeks ago, so was not suprised the jury thought the same. They dismissed Lees's inconsistencies as understandable for the circumstances, and dismissed the defence's story as plain rubbish.
I hope he is found guilty of the other murders they are looking into, to see if there are more dna links, as other families need closures too

Saturday, December 31st 2005 - 07:55:52 AM
Name: Emma S
Comments:Fantastic site! I've been reading up on the Falconio case and believe 100% that Murdoch is innocent. My theory is that Lees & Falconio faked his death to get half of the insurance money each. He'd go his own way and she'd be able to start a new life with her lover "Nick"..there is no way that woman is as innocent as she makes out....
Tuesday, December 27th 2005 - 06:06:07 PM
Name: Alan
E-mail address: asandy391@btinternet.com
Comments:I think there is something fishy about falconios girlfriend, i do not trust her and thought murdoch would get off with it, things dont seem to add up.
Tuesday, December 13th 2005 - 10:13:57 PM
Name: Caroline
Comments:Just received your e-mail. It's very sad to hear that you will not be writing for a while. There are not enough people like you to help those who are clearly innocent. I hope you will not stay away too long. All the very best and keep us updated.
Sunday, December 11th 2005 - 09:05:06 AM
Name: mike
E-mail address: mikebusman@eircom.net
Comments:Reminds me of 'The Dingo is Innocent'. The arsenal of weapons and shovels found in Bradley's van is disturbing as was Ms Lees behaviour in the aftermath of Falconi's dissaperance. Picnic at Hanging Rock also comes to mind. Weird case.
Mike.
Monday, November 28th 2005 - 12:38:43 AM
Name: antipodean
Comments:Please keep up with the court case. Joanne Less demonstrated in court that she could bring her handcuffed hands from the back to the front within seconds. As a fairly flexible woman myself, I could do it too.

Please keep objective and scientific, and keep in mind the following: Lees was stoned when it happened, and this may explain inconsistencies in her account; Murdoch fits the identikit, which was drawn from her description long before he was caught; Falconio's blood was found on the road (DNA proven).

There are two scenarios, both of which fit the evidence to the same extent. One includes James Hepe lying to get out of his drugs charge, and Murdoch's ex-girlfriend lying for no apparent reason, and Lees and perhaps Falconio choosing Murdoch beforehand, and formulating a description from that before she/they performed some sort of fraud, and then either evidence was planted, or there were lab stuff-ups.

The other is that all is as it seems.

Unfortunately it will take great knowledge of forensic science to work out what has happened. I suggest if you are going to write a book, you contact Emeritus Professor Barry Boettcher, who help exhonerate Lindy Chamberlain, and who will have followed the case.
Friday, November 25th 2005 - 09:01:57 AM
Name: Bill
E-mail address: whatsthatallabout@fastmail.fm
Comments:Hi!

Great site, I found it only when I was searching for more information on the Bradley Murdoch case. Why have we not heard anything from his side and why are there so many inconsistencies in the evidence given. I hope the truth of this case comes out. Whatever that may be.

Bill (ex NSW – Now living in London)
Tuesday, October 18th 2005 - 01:43:23 PM
Name: Peggy
Comments:An absolutely incredible website - long may it reign to help the great number of miscarriages of justice that occur each year in the 'British' Justice' system.

God bless you Scott

Peggy
Friday, October 14th 2005 - 04:13:10 PM
Name: Joluma
E-mail address: joluma@bellsouth.net
Comments:Hi Scott,

Extremely interesting site you have here. I am eagerly looking forward to your investigation of the Steven Jones case.
Friday, September 16th 2005 - 06:21:53 PM
Name: Mike.
Comments:I agree with the previous comments. It is far too easy under the British Justice system to convict.
A case in point is a recent murder conviction where the Irish Justice minister allowed a murder case to go ahead in the UK rather than in Eire, as there was a better chance of conviction in the UK. The accused was convicted, and in my opinion the verdict was probably correct.
Nevertheless, the test in the UK would seem to be lower than in other countries.
Friday, September 9th 2005 - 12:40:52 AM
Name: Thomas Leitch Green
E-mail address: thomas.green3@btinternet.com
Comments:I have written to the Scottish Excuse for the Justice Minister (Cathy Jamieson ) I suggested that in the terms of EQUALITY, That any Police man or person caught, (in the process of any criminal proceedings) fabricating evidence or committing perjury, should be given the punishment that the accused person faces if convicted.
I believe this is one way of eradicating corruption in the Police Forces. There is no Justice in a corrupt Society.
Thomas Leitch Green. ( Why not attempt to have a bill initiated in order to change the law )
Tuesday, September 6th 2005 - 12:38:55 PM
Name: Mike
E-mail address: mikebourke2@hotmail.com
Homepage URL: http://www.barrygeorge.com
Comments:If anyone is still interested in the Jill Dando murder investigation I suggest they get a copy of Master DETECTIVE magazine from October 1999. The report on the Dando murder investigation reinforces the belief that Barry George was, to put it crudely, 'Stitched Up' for the assassination of Jill Dando.
Maguire seven, Birmingham Six, Guildford four, Bridgewater three, Cardiff three, Fulham one, and still the injustices go on.
Monday, September 5th 2005 - 12:26:43 AM
Name: Sophie
Comments:Hi Scott,
I just had a quick look through your website and i just want to say that it's an incredible website you should be so proud.
Keep up the good work, your doing an amazing job.

Sophie
xx
Thursday, September 1st 2005 - 08:50:22 PM
Name: S. C. Lomax
Comments:Thanks for the messages. I'm away at the moment but will respond to them and fix your typing errors when I return.
Tuesday, August 30th 2005 - 05:10:03 PM
[ Sign my Dreambook | Back to The Official Website of S. C. Lomax ]

This Dreambook brought to you by
DreamHost Web Hosting