G U E S T B O O K

NAME Boran
E-MAIL boran_9@hotmail.com

COMMENTS

 Hi Brian,

I know, you will be very famous writer one day...please don't forget your friend from FICS who already knew that...may be, I can get your book with your sign.
DATE Saturday, October 6th 2007 - 07:39:04 AM

NAME ParrotHead
E-MAIL 1wizard@clearwire.net

COMMENTS

 Great site!
DATE Monday, January 29th 2007 - 04:35:47 AM

NAME wref
E-MAIL wrefmail@gmail.com
URL http://geocities.com/uk.biomaster/index.html

COMMENTS

 i like your site , :)
DATE Wednesday, January 17th 2007 - 04:35:07 PM

NAME foxbat
E-MAIL foxbat@freechess.org
URL http://www.freechess.org

COMMENTS

 I'd help support this this place with donations, except for the "Impeach Bush" theme.
DATE Tuesday, December 12th 2006 - 09:04:03 AM

NAME John Kerry
E-MAIL jk@hotmail.com

COMMENTS

 this website sucks.
DATE Sunday, November 26th 2006 - 03:53:57 PM

NAME Shiqin
E-MAIL sayangem@yahoo.com

COMMENTS

 nice and surprise..........cool
DATE Wednesday, November 15th 2006 - 05:51:46 PM

NAME marc
E-MAIL marcstender@gmail.com

COMMENTS

 wow, great site! lots to read, I'll be back 4 sure ;)
DATE Monday, October 2nd 2006 - 12:08:21 PM

NAME tommaso rossellini

COMMENTS

 the very worst of america is unfortunately in power. this great country can do better. we must do better.
DATE Saturday, January 21st 2006 - 07:07:21 PM

NAME Rob / DuPontDoc (FICS)

COMMENTS

 I've been impressed by your willingness and ability to espouse common sense in the face of chattering demagogues for a few years now. Came to see your site through your finger notes; I found it excellent and entertaining. Keep up the good work.
See you over the chess board- Doc, Belize C.A.
DATE Friday, November 4th 2005 - 07:10:39 AM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 Vanessa D.,

I wonder why you don't seem to realize that your hatred and contempt for Americans is precisely the mirror image of the way in which the neoconservatives whom you SHOULD be blaming for U.S. foreign policy view the world outside the United States.

It is almost always a mistake to blame an entire group -- whether it be a nation, a gender, a religion or any other such demographic division -- for the actions of a few of its members. It is symptomatic of prejudice, which is an offense against both reason and morality. And it is no less odious in anti-American than in American bigots.

DATE Tuesday, November 1st 2005 - 05:08:46 AM

NAME vanessa d just one more thing

COMMENTS

 nostradumus predicted this, the holy war will last 25 years, and during that time their will be alot of death billions , bush is the biggest threat to this world and osama kill the f---ers both,

[Note: This is a family site, so I have deleted the expletive from your message above.]
DATE Thursday, October 27th 2005 - 01:37:46 AM

NAME vanessa d

COMMENTS

 f u america
DATE Thursday, October 27th 2005 - 01:33:50 AM

NAME WILLIAM A JACOBS
E-MAIL MONEYLION1@AOL.COM

COMMENTS

 BUSH IS AN IDIOT----NO---HE's NOT THAT SMART
DATE Thursday, September 29th 2005 - 09:04:11 PM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://squort.com

COMMENTS

 Katrina,

Thanks for getting in touch. Wednesday should work well; perhaps around 7:00. We'll call, or you can, to work out specifics before then. I have sent an e-mail to this effect, but your address failed the first two times I tried sending it, so I am reiterating the contents here.

Also: To prevent spammers getting your e-mail address, I have deleted it from your entry below.

Look forward to seeing you soon and hearing about Finland.
DATE Monday, August 8th 2005 - 06:05:54 AM

NAME Katrina Jaatinen
E-MAIL [E-mail hidden to prevent spam]

COMMENTS

 Hello! I´m so sorry for not answering your call as I have been extremely busy. At the moment I am on the other side of the planet in Imatra, Finland. Almost all my relatives on my fathers side live in this country, though he was born in the United States. (I am 50% Fin.) I am amazed with all the information you have provided on Ladybug´s site and hyper-links! I feel like I know so much about your family though we have only met twice. Next week, we will be back in California and I have decided not to return to work at Graffix Pleasure. Taco Bell will pay my bills and I need to enjoy some of the remaining summer. I have your number, maybe we could meet next Wednesday(a day I would normally be working). See you later!
DATE Sunday, August 7th 2005 - 05:34:14 AM

NAME CallmeJoe
E-MAIL dontbugme@bugmenot.com

COMMENTS

 I love these RedDiaper-DoperBaby websites. Keep it up.
DATE Friday, July 22nd 2005 - 07:51:14 AM

NAME Jim Jones

COMMENTS

 What do you base your facts on?
DATE Thursday, April 21st 2005 - 11:46:25 PM

NAME Brad Thomas
E-MAIL bradct@delanet.com
URL http://members.fcc.net/bradct

COMMENTS

 Interesting site. You make some good points on the problems in U.S. politics(even though the problems go much further than Bush or other Presidents). I've seen many of the often comical FICS discussions

FICS handle forkUU
DATE Wednesday, April 13th 2005 - 03:54:51 PM

NAME Judy Dowd
E-MAIL judithjd@cruzio.com

COMMENTS

 OK I admit it I googled my self. but look what I found! what a pleasure to read about Samantha. Hope you're well
Judy
DATE Monday, March 21st 2005 - 07:54:12 PM

NAME Rochester
DATE Monday, March 14th 2005 - 03:03:53 AM

NAME CHRONSMOKE
E-MAIL chronsmoker@hotmail.com

COMMENTS

 hi warts...just checkin out yer page..you are the smartest most open minded rational person on fics.
DATE Friday, March 11th 2005 - 09:04:43 AM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 Amanda,

I do not, except under most unusual circumstances, e-mail anyone who posts to this book.
DATE Thursday, February 17th 2005 - 08:55:47 PM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 Alex/blackhole:

Please note that I was not informed of your entry until today, else I would have rebutted it more promptly.

Apparently you have missed some crucial facts in your analysis. Among others:

(1) I did not draft the Articles of Impeachment: As I have made, I think, quite clear, they originated with former Attorney General Ramsey Clark, whom you should address with any questions as to their content -- and who should by virtue of his position and experience be regarded, until proven otherwise, as cognizant of the legal requirements for an impeachment resolution.

(2) Although not formally a part of our constitution, the UN charter does have weight in U.S. law, as it does in the legal systems of all member nations, which cede a portion of their sovereignty to the international body in the interest of maintaining order and peace. Therefore, violating that charter can indeed be considered a rationale for impeachment.
As for the courts finding evidence of violation of the constitution, it is rather difficult for them to do so when no case has been placed before them to date. It is, however, the prerogative of *Congress* to determine the question of impeachment; and if it does not do so, this probably reflects the legislature's partisan composition more than the merits of the question.

(3) I'm not quite sure how you inferred that I nurture a personal animus for George W. Bush. I am not impressed by the man's apparent intellectual vacuity, but my opposition to him is not based on that personal impression; rather, it is driven by the ideology and policies of his administration, which have done immense harm, probably irrevocably, to both American institutions and international relations, while profoundly damaging the economic interests and environmental circumstances of our society's most vulnerable members, and ruthlessly suppressing and decimating the still more vulnerable people of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Please do try to understand this distinction, for it is a vital one.

(4) Without attempting to delineate the parameters justifying impeachment, I would like to note that ideologues appear to broaden and narrow those parameters to serve their own ideologies and their standard-bearers, as evidenced by the Republican attempt to impeach former President Bill Clinton for what was, however distasteful, more a violation of sexual mores than of law.
In Clinton's case, a stained dress and a few ill-considered attempts at denial and evasion precipitated an impeachment resolution that nearly removed a sitting president from office on grounds that could not be reasonably extrapolated as suggesting any substantial harm to America or any other nation. I am, as many of my readers know, no fan of Clinton: He lacked all resolve, and seemed more concerned with personal popularity than with actually achieving anything of moment. But none of his offenses rose to anything approaching impeachable culpability, and years and many millions of dollars were wasted in the attempt to punish him for his real offense: having unseated Bush Sr. and thereby created a lacuna athwart the Republican dynasty; in short, he was elected, as the Repubs perceived it, "out of turn."
Meanwhile, George W. Bush (the Leader in his "cuirassier boots," as Hitler phrased it) has obliterated tens of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans who had done us no harm, while visiting untold misery upon millions more. He has rapaciously transferred wealth from the vast majority of lower- and middle-class Americans to his cadre of plutocratic campaign contributors, while leaving millions of citizens without health insurance and at the mercy of corporations whose sole object is to profit by the misfortunes of others. He has ignored and stonewalled initiatives against global climate intensification (AKA global warming) even as Antarctic ice shelves have begun to slide into the sea and over 80 percent of the world's glaciers have melted, and this at a time when the Indian Ocean tsunami has made utterly clear the dangers that will be posed by rising sea levels in conjunction with lethal poverty inculcated in large part by the same business interests that so overtly determine America's policy under Bush's watch. I cannot begin to catalog all of his administration's crimes here, but this should suffice to illustrate my point.
And yet, somehow, in your mind, having sex with an aide is an impeachable offense, while despoiling the environment, poisoning our air and water in the name of unfettered commerce, depriving poor Americans of health services and mere subsistence and exterminating tens of thousands abroad are not.

One is left to wonder what sorts of moral standards actually motivate you.
DATE Thursday, February 17th 2005 - 08:04:53 PM

NAME Amanda

COMMENTS

 dont email me k k
DATE Thursday, February 17th 2005 - 03:57:07 PM

NAME Amanda
E-MAIL carpetmom1@msn.com

COMMENTS

 hey kool website!
DATE Thursday, February 17th 2005 - 03:54:42 PM

NAME rebecca binz siegel
E-MAIL artbecky@juno.com
DATE Thursday, February 17th 2005 - 10:35:21 AM

NAME Alex
E-MAIL :blackhole:
URL http://VirusOrCancer.com

COMMENTS

 "Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law"-what you say on you site

I didn't know that the US president can be impeached because he defied the UN Charter?! His defience of the US constitution is up to the courts (judicial branch) and so far, the courts have found no such evidence.

People, like you, who hate a person so deeply have serious issues. While I don't agree with GWB on MANY issues, I don't want to impeach him because he defied the UN Charter!! That is the top 1 reason you give for impeachment! This kills any credability this site, and you, have.

The rule of law, is NOT mentioned anywhere in the constitution, in fact the idea was "created" by Albert Venn in 1895. And this is also not an impeachable offence.

You should use your brain, before making and writing statements like this. Otherwise, as has happened, your credability is completely gone.
DATE Wednesday, February 2nd 2005 - 11:35:20 PM

NAME Walt Patterson
E-MAIL wpatterson@cox.net

COMMENTS

 Came across this site from a link in another site and was supprised to find content that I could relate to.
DATE Thursday, December 30th 2004 - 07:19:57 PM

NAME Dean
E-MAIL dean2@tbaytel.net
URL http://truth.5u.com

COMMENTS

 Thanks for keeping up the pressure to letting the TRUTH be told.

WAKE UP People!!

We are living in VERY DECEPTIVE times.

Sincerely, Dean Mcleod
DATE Sunday, July 4th 2004 - 08:54:08 AM

NAME David Koblick
E-MAIL davykob@liwest.at

COMMENTS

 You and I have exactly the same political opinions. Me, I also did 4˝ years in the Navy during WW II, in the South Pacific mostly, first in the Seabees, then Line, honorably discharged as Chief Electrician's Mate. I'll turn 88 on the tragic date of 9/11/04. Coincidentally, I met my wife
43 years ago through Eric Blumrich's father Steve. Still mentally active--spare the time to google me and read my translation and other credits and my true story "The Wall."
DATE Monday, June 21st 2004 - 01:17:14 PM

NAME Strakh
E-MAIL NathanJBoone@Netscape.net

COMMENTS

 Somehow there's something wrong when the first people to register the doman name literally can claim a monopoly on common sense....

Looking forward to the Solidarity website. Hopefully it will include a link to our mutual friend Blik....

Strakh
DATE Wednesday, June 9th 2004 - 05:31:30 PM

NAME Playlight
E-MAIL Playlight@ilse.nl

COMMENTS

 Great work WarthogsUNLTD
FICS rules
WWW.FREECHESS.ORG
DATE Wednesday, June 9th 2004 - 06:38:35 AM

NAME Die Fledermaus
E-MAIL elfblade@yahoo.com

COMMENTS

 A lot of of the people I've protested this war with are Veterans, actually. A lot of them came back from Gulf War I and voted against Bush Sr. It should make a person think twice when so many of our Soldiers see no reason to be in Iraq right now.

This website is awesome. Keep up the good work!
DATE Wednesday, January 28th 2004 - 07:33:24 PM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 "veteran":

I am also a veteran, having served well and honorably in the Navy from 1984-1992, and this site reflects my outrage at the way our nation's ideals have been flushed down the proverbial toilet by George II and his adherents.

And by the way, in case you've somehow missed all the news since Dick Cheney blamed Iraq for 9/11: There is no connection. Iraq had nothing whatever to do with that vile act. Iraq posed no imminent threat to the United States or any of its regional neighbors. In fact, it posed no threat at all.

You may want to consider the FACTS before you make irresponsible comments. And you may, if you are at all intellectually honest, want to inform yourself as to why we did invade. The answer may not please you, but it will at least be the truth--in absolute contrast to anything promulgated by this apparently Josef Goebbels-inspired White House propaganda machine.
DATE Sunday, January 18th 2004 - 08:01:23 AM

NAME veteran
E-MAIL mstreeter@frontiernet.net

COMMENTS

 you sound like a stinkin' loser. Tell your crap to the families of 911 if you want to talk about ground zero.
DATE Friday, January 9th 2004 - 04:37:31 PM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@neteze.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 Always pleasant to be told "grow up doofus" [sic] by someone whose opinion is obviously based entirely on his first glance at my homepage.
Did you even bother to read anything I said? Didn't think so.
As for your being "anchored@reality", I can only tell you, and hope you will live long enough to confirm for yourself, that you are on the wrong side of the Iraq issue, the wrong side of the U.N. issue, the wrong side of social evolution, and the wrong side of history.
DATE Thursday, December 18th 2003 - 06:54:51 AM

NAME Uri Worstnighmare
E-MAIL anchored@reality.com

COMMENTS

 grow up doofus!
The world is ruled by the strong.
Those of your ilk would see America become a UN lackey state.
Go away and come back when you see the light.
DATE Saturday, December 6th 2003 - 09:29:16 PM

NAME MUGU
E-MAIL mugu@maga.com

COMMENTS

 guy man keep it up nice site you know what i mean......
DATE Saturday, October 18th 2003 - 07:14:04 AM

NAME Chessty
E-MAIL Chessty@freechess.org

COMMENTS

 Very nice site!
DATE Saturday, July 19th 2003 - 08:48:00 AM

NAME Webmaster
E-MAIL pointzero@cruzers.com
URL http://www.squort.com

COMMENTS

 Leonard,

Quite right. The Ohlones apparently viewed Santa Cruz as a "black hole" in the sense that they felt once someone had lived here for five years, it would no longer be possible for him or her to leave.
DATE Sunday, July 6th 2003 - 06:20:11 AM

[Sign] [View] [Squort.com]

This Dreambook brought to you by
DreamHost Web Hosting